Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-4hvwz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T15:16:03.173Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The larvae of the Pandalidae

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Marie V. Lebour
Affiliation:
Naturalist at the Plymouth Laboratory

Extract

Little is known of the larvac of the Pandalidac as is shown by Gurney (1939) in his Bibliography of the Larvae of Decapod Crustacea. Berkeley (1930,1938) describes the life histories of several species of Pandalus and of Pandalopsis dtspar from British Columbia, and Gurney (1937) the larvae and post-larvae of Chlorotocella, but beyond these the information is fragmentary. Sars’ (1900) work on Pandalus borealis and P. bonnieri was formerly regarded as typical of pandalid larvae but these were proved to be Caridion (Lebour, 1930). Sars (1900), however, described in part in an excellent manner the larvae of Pandalus montagui and Pandalina brevirostris and Stephensen (1935) the early larvae of Pandalus propinquus.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1940

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bate, C.Spence, , 1888. Report on the scientific results of the exploring voyage of H.M.S. Challenger, 1873-1876. Crustacea Macrura. Voy. H.M.S.“Challenger”, Zoology, Vol. XXIV, pp. 1942.Google Scholar
Berkeley, A., 1930. The postembryonic development of the common Pandalids of British Columbia. Contrib. Canad. Biol., N.S., Vol. VI, pp. 1–85.Google Scholar
Berkeley, A., 1938. The larval development of Pandalus stenolepis. Journ. Fish. Res. Board Canada, Vol. IV, pp. 8895.Google Scholar
Coutière, H., 1905. Note préliminaire sur les Eucyphotes recueillis par S.A.S. le Prince de Monaco à l'aide du filet à grande ouverture. Bull. Mus. Oceanogr. Monaco, No. 48, pp. 135.Google Scholar
Coutière, H. 1907. Sur quelques formes larvaires énigmatiques d’Eucyphotes, provenant des collections de S.A.S. le Prince de Monaco. Bull. Mus. Oceanogr. Monaco, No. 104, 70 pp.Google Scholar
Gurney, R., 1924. Decapod larvae. Nat. Hist. Rep. “Terra Nova” Exped. Zoology, VIII. Crustacea, pp. 37202.Google Scholar
Gurney, R., 1926. The protozoeal stage in decapod development. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., Ser. (9), Vol. XVIII, pp. 1927.Google Scholar
Gurney, R., 1937. Notes on some decapod and stomatopod Crustacea from the Red Sea. III-V. III. The larvae of Gonodactylus glabrous Brooks, and other Stomatopoda. IV. The larva of Callianassa. V. The larvae of Chlorotocella Balss. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., Ser. B, 1937, pp. 319–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurney, R., 1939. Bibliography of the larvae of decapod Crustacea. Ray Society, pp. 1123.Google Scholar
Kemp, S., 1925. Notes on Crustacea Decapoda in the Indian Museum. XVII. On various Caridea. Rec. Ind. Mus., Vol. XXVII, Pt iv, pp. 249343.Google Scholar
Lebour, M. V., 1930. The larval stages of Caridion, with a description of a new species, C., steveni.Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 1930, pp. 181–94.Google Scholar
De Man, J. G., 1920. The decapoda of the Siboga Expedition. Part IV. Siboga Expedition, XXXIXA, pp. 1318.Google Scholar
Sars, G. O., 1900. Account of the post-embryonal development of Pandalus borealis, with remarks on the development of other Pandali, and descriptions of the adult Pandalus borealis. Rep. Norweg. Fish. Invest., Vol. 1, No. 3, 45 pp.Google Scholar
Stephensen, K., 1912. Report on the Malacostraca collected by the “Tjalfe” expedition. Vidensk. Medd. Naturh. Foren. Kogb., Bd. LXIV, pp. 57134.Google Scholar
Stephensen, K., 1935. The Godthaab Expedition, 1928. Crustacea Decapoda. Medd. Grenland, Bd. LXXX, No. 1, 94 pp.Google Scholar
Webb, G., 1921. The larvae of the Decapoda Macrura and Anomura of Plymouth. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XII, pp. 385417.Google Scholar