Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wp2c8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-01T17:01:53.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Occurrence of Multiple Rows of ‘Teeth’ in the Shell of the Dog-Whelk Nucella Lapillus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

E. B. Cowell  and
J. H. Crothers
E. B. Cowell
Affiliation:
Field Studies Council, Orielton Field Centre, Pembroke, Pembs.
J. H. Crothers
Affiliation:
Field Studies Council, Nettlecombe Court, Williton, Taunton, Somerset.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The common dog-whelk, Nucella (= Thais, = Purpura) lapillus (L.), is often selected for ecological, physiological and genetical study. In recent years most workers have based their investigations on the work of Moore (1936; 1938a, b) and most have used his observation that ‘at the onset of maturity, growth of the (shell) lip ceases and instead the region near the lip thickens, while the lip itself becomes rounded and a series of rounded “teeth” develop on its inner side which still further occlude the opening’. It has been assumed that all animals showing these features are adult, and have ceased growing, for Moore goes on to say ‘occasional specimens are taken in which the presence of a second set of teeth within the marginal ones indicates that the original stoppage of growth was followed by a second slight growing period, this in turn being replaced by a second period of thickening and growth stoppage, but such specimens are too rare to be a serious source of error.’ This assumption has been incorporated into most subsequent reviews of shore ecology.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 50 , Issue 4 , November 1970 , pp. 1101 - 1111
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ballantine, W. J., 1961. A biologically-defined exposure scale for the comparative description of rocky shores. Fid Stud., Vol. 1, part 3, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
Berry, R. J. & Crothers, J. H., 1968. Stabilising selection in the dog-whelk (Nucella lapillus). J. Zool., Vol. 155, pp. 5–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, R. J. & Crothers, J. H., 1970. Genotypic stability and physiological tolerance in the dog-whelk, Nucella lapillus (L.). J. Zool. Lond., Vol. 162 (in the Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryan, G. W., 1969. The effects of oil-spill removers (‘detergents’) on the gastropod Nucella lapillus on a rocky shore and in the laboratory. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 49, pp. 1067–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feare, C. J., 1970. Aspects of the ecology of an exposed shore population of dogwhelks Nucella lapillus (L.). Oecologia (Berl.), Vol. 5, pp. 1–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kincaid, T., 1957. Local Races and Clines in the Marine Gastropod Thais lamellosa Gmelin: a Population Study, 75 pp. Seattle.Google Scholar
Largen, M. J., 1967. The diet of the dog-whelk, Nucella lapillus (Gastropoda: Prosobranchia). J. Zool., Lond., Vol. 151, pp. 123–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, J. R., 1964. The Ecology of Rocky Shores, 323 p. London: English Universities Press Ltd.Google Scholar
Moore, H. B., 1936. The biology of Purpura lapillus. I. Shell variation in relation to environment. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 21, pp. 61–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, H. B., 1938a. The biology of Purpura lapillus. II. Growth. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 23, pp. 57–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, H. B., 1938b. The biology of Purpura lapillus. III. Life history in relation to environment factors. J. mar. biol Ass. U.K., Vol. 23, pp. 67–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zenkovich, V. P., 1967. Processes of Coastal Development; transl. from the Russian, ed. by Stevens, J. A., pp. 137–53.Google Scholar
Nelson-Smith, A., 1968 a. Biological consequences of oil pollution and shore cleansing. Biological Effects of Oil on Littoral Communities, ed. Carthy, J. D. and Arthur, D. R.Fld Stud., Vol. 2 suppl., pp. 73–80.Google Scholar
Nelson-Smith, A., 1968 b. The effects of oil pollution and emulsifier cleansing on shore life in south-west Britain. J. appl. Ecol., Vol. 5, pp. 97–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J. E. (ed)., 1968. ‘Torrey Canyon’ Pollution and Marine Life, 196 pp. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar