Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-2l2gl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T04:20:59.441Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Preliminary Check-List of British Marine Algae

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Mary Parke
Mary Parke
Affiliation:
The Plymouth Laboratory
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This preliminary list of some of the classes of the algae has been prepared, mainly for the use of British phycologists, to form a basis on which to work for the eventual compilation of a complete check and locality list of all species of British marine algae. The compiler would be grateful for all additions and corrections to this list, and for records of marine species from the algal classes not included in the present list.

The classes of algae treated in this list are the Chlorophyceae (53 gen., 156 spp.), Xanthophyceae (7 gen., 15 spp.), Chrysophyceae (15 gen., 22 spp.), Phaeophyceae (96 gen., 199 spp.), Rhodophyceae (126 gen., 324 spp.), and Cyanophyceae (39 gen., 125 spp.). The genera are listed alphabetically under the family and the species alphabetically under the genus. If a name has been changed from that given in Newton (1931), the name in Newton is added, in brackets, below. Names preceded by a question mark appear to need revision for nomenclatural or taxonomic reasons. Most of the so-called varieties listed are very probably merely habitat forms of the species, but further investigation is needed before new combinations are made for them. Notes are given at the end of each class, the number in brackets following a name in the list refers to these notes.

The compiler is grateful to Mr R. Ross and Miss Linda Newton, of the British Museum, and to Miss C. I. Dickinson, of the Herbarium, Kew, for their help over a number of problems.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 32 , Issue 2 , October 1953 , pp. 497 - 520
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1953

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Batters, E. A.'L. 1906. New or critical British marine Algae. Journ. Bot., Lond., Vol. 44 pp. 1–3.Google Scholar
Bliding, C. 1944. Zur Systematik des schwedischen Enteromorphen. Bot. Notiser, 1944, pp. 331–56.Google Scholar
Chadefaud, M. 1941. Sur l'organisation et la position systématique des Flageltés du genre Pyramidomonas. Rev. Sci., Paris, 79 année, pp. 113–14.Google Scholar
Chadefaud, M. 1945. Sur la position systématique des Vauchéries. Bull. Soc. bot. Fr., T. 92, pp. 47–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chadefaud, M. 1951. Les Vauchéries sont des Xanthophycées. Bull. Soc. bot. Fr., T. 98, pp. 210–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, V. J. 1939. Some algal complexities. Rhodora, Vol. 41, pp. 19–28.Google Scholar
Chapman, V. J. 1952. New entities in the Chlorophyceae of New Zealand. Trans. Roy. Soc. N.Z., Vol. 80, pp. 47–58.Google Scholar
Christensen, T. 1952. Studies on the genus Vaucheria. I. A list of finds from Denmark and England with notes on some submarine species. Bot. Tidsskr., Bd. 49, pp., 171–88.Google Scholar
Cotton, A. D. 1912. Clare Island Survey. Pt. 15. Marine Algae. Proc. Roy. Irish Acad., Vol. 31, 178 pp.Google Scholar
Drew, K. M. 1949. Conchocelis—phase in the life-history of Porphyra umbilicalis (L.) Kütz. Nature, Lond., Vol. 164, p. 748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drouet, F. 1951. Cyanophyta. Chapter 8 in Manual of Phycology. Ed. G. M. Smith. Waltham, Mass.Google Scholar
Drouet, F. & Daily, W. A. 1952. A synopsis of the coccoid Myxophyceae. Butler Univ. Bot. Stud., Vol. 10, pp. 220–23.Google Scholar
Du Rietz, G. E. 1940. On tie identity of Dictyosiphon chordaria Areschoug and Gobia baltica (Gobi) Reinke. Svensk bot. Tidskr., Bd. 34, pp. 35–46.Google Scholar
Du Rietz, G. E. 1947. Wellengrenzen als ökologische Äquivalente der Wasserstandslinien. Zool. Bidr. Uppsala, Bd. 25, pp. 534–50.Google Scholar
Feldmann, J. 1941. Les Algues Marines de la Côte des Albères. IV. Rhodophycees. Fasc. II (Gigartinales, Rhodymeniales). Rev. Algol, T. 12, pp. 77–100.Google Scholar
Feldmann, J. 1942. Les Algues Marines de la Côte des Albères. IV. Rhodophycées. Fasc. Ill (Céramiales).Trav. Algol., Vol. 1, pp. 29–113.Google Scholar
Feldmann, J. 1949. L'ordre des Scytosiphonales. Mém. Soc. Hist. Nat. Afr. N., Hors-série, T. 2, pp. 103–15.Google Scholar
Feldmann, J. 1952. Les cycles de reproduction des algues et leurs rapports avec la phylogenie. Rev. Cytol., Paris, T. 13, pp. 1–49.Google Scholar
Feldmann, J. & G., 1942. Recherches sur les Bonnemaisoniacees et leur alternance de générations. Ann. Sci. nat. (Bot.), IIe Série, T. 3, pp. 75–175.Google Scholar
Feldmann, J. & G, 1952. Nouvelles recherches sur le cycle des Bonnemaisoniacées: le développement des Tétraspores du Falkenbergia rufolanosa (Harv.) Schmitz. Rev. gén. Bot., T. 593 pp. 313–23.Google Scholar
Feldmann-Mazoyer, G. 1940. Recherches sur les Céramiacées de la Méditerranée Occidentale. 510 pp., Alger.Google Scholar
Frémy, P. 1934. Cyanophycées des côtes d'Europe. Mém. Soc. nat. Sci. Cherbourg, T. 41, pp. 1–235.Google Scholar
Fritsch, F. E. 1945. The Structure and Reproduction of the Algae, Vol. 2. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Geitler, L. 1932. Cyanophyceae. Rabenhorst's Kryptogamen-Flora, Bd. 14. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Hamel, G. 1924. Floridées de France. I. Rev. Algol., T. 1, pp. 278–92.Google Scholar
Hamel, G. 1931. Chlorophycées des côtes francaises (Fin). Rev. Algol., T. 2. pp. 9–73.Google Scholar
Hamel, G. 1931–1939. Pheophycees de France. Paris.Google Scholar
Harvey, W. H. 1846–1851. Phycologia Britannica, Vols. 1–4. London.Google Scholar
Hollenberg, G. J. 1941. Observations on Ralfsiaceae. Amer.Jown. Bot., Vol. 28, p. 728.Google Scholar
Jaasund, E. 1951. Marine algae from northern Norway. I.Bot. Notiser, pp. 128–42.Google Scholar
Kolderup Rosenvinge, L. 1924. The marine algae of Denmark. Pt. III. Rhodophyceae. Ill (Ceramiales). K. danske vidensk. Selsk., Ser. Nat., Math. Afd., 7, pp. 287–486.Google Scholar
Kolderup Rosenvinge, L. with contributions by Soren, lund 1935. On some Danish Phaeophyceae. K. danske vidensk. Selsk., Nat. Math. Afd., 9, Ser. VI, pp. 1–40.Google Scholar
Kolderup Rosenvinge, L. (†) & Lund, Sören 1947. The marine algae of Denmark. Vol. II Phaeophyceae. III.Biol. Skr., Bd. 4, pp., 1–99.Google Scholar
Kornmann, P. 1953. Der Formenkreis von Acinetospora crinita (Carm.) nov.comb. Helgoländ. Wiss. Meeresunters., Bd. 4, pp. 205–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koster, J. Th. 1952. Rare or otherwise interesting marine algae from the Nether-lands. Acta Bot. Néerland., Vol. 1, pp. 201–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuckuck, P. (†), 1953. (Ed. by P. Kornmann.) Ectocarpaceen-Studien. I. Hecatonema, Chilionema, Compsonema. Helgoländ. Wiss. Meeresunters., Bd. 4, pp. 316–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kylin, H. 1933. Über die Entwicklungsgeschichte der Phaeophyceen. K. fysiogr. Sällsk. Lund Förh., Bd. 44, 102 pp.Google Scholar
Kylin, H. 1934. Bemerkungen über einige Nitophyllaceen. K. fysiogr. Sällsk. Lund Förk., Bd. 4, pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
Kylin, H. 1935. Über einige kalkbohrende Chlorophyceen. K. fysiogr. Sällsk. Lund Förh., Bd. 5, 19 pp.Google Scholar
Kylin, H. 1944. Die Rhodophyceen der schwedischen westküste. K. fysiogr. Sällsk. Lund Förh., N.F., Bd. 55, 104 pp.Google Scholar
Kylin, H. 1947. Die Phaeophyceen der schwedischen westküste. K. fysiogr. Sällsk. Lund Förh., N.F., Bd. 58, 99 pp.Google Scholar
Kylin, H. 1949. Die Chlorophyceen der schwedischen westküste. K. fysiogr. Sallsk. Lund Forh., N.F., Bd. 60, 79 pp.Google Scholar
Lanjouw, J. (ed. by), 1952. International Code of Botanical Nomenclature adopted by the Seventh International Botanical Congress, Stockholm, July 1950, Utrecht.Google Scholar
Lemoine, Mme P. 1928. Sur la présence de Lithophyllum orbiculatum Fosl. dans la Manche et son attribution au genre Pseudolithophyllum. Rev. Algol., T. 4, pp. 1–6.Google Scholar
Levring, T. 1937. Zur Kenntnis der Algenflora der norwegischen Westküste. K. fysiogr. Sällsk. Lund Förh., N.F., Bd. 48, 147, pp.Google Scholar
Levring, T.J 1940.Studien tiber die Algenvegetation von Blekinge, Südschweden. 178 pp., Lund.Google Scholar
Levring, T. J. 1945. Zur Kenntnis zweier endophytischer Phaeophyceen. Acta Hon. gothoburg., Bd. 16, pp. 185–90.Google Scholar
Lindstedt, A. 1943. Die Flora der marinen Cyanophyceen der schwedischen Westküste. 121 pp., Lund.Google Scholar
Lucas, J. A. W. 1950. The algae transported on drifting objects and washed ashore on the Netherlands' coast.Blumea, Vol. 6, pp. 527–43.Google Scholar
Lund, S. 1950. The marine algae of Denmark. Vol. II. Phaeophyceae. IV.Biol.Skr., Bd. 6, pp. 1–80.Google Scholar
Lyle, L. 1920. The marine algae of Guernsey. Journ. Bot., Lond., Vol. 583 suppl. 2, 53 PP.Google Scholar
Lyle, L. 1923. Distribution of the marine flora of the Channel Islands compared with that of the coasts of Western Europe. Journ. EcoL, Vol. 11, pp. 77–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, S. M.Newton, L.Orr, A. P.et al., 1949. A Study of certain British Seaweeds and their Utilization in the Preparation of Agar. 184 pp. London: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Nadson, G. A. 1932. Contribution à l'etude des algues perforantes. Bull. Acad. sci. U.R.S.S., VIIe Sér., no.7, pp. 833–45.Google Scholar
Newton, L. 1931. A Handbook of British Seaweeds. London.Google Scholar
Papenfuss, G. F. 1950. Review of the genera of algae described by Stackhouse. Hydrobiologia, Vol. 2, pp. 181–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schotter, G. 1952. Note sur le Gymnogongrus nicaeensis (Dub.) Ardiss. et Straff. Bull. Soct. Hist. nat. Afr. N., T. 43, pp. 203–10.Google Scholar
Setchell, W. A. & Gardner, N. L. 1925. The marine algae of the Pacific coast of North America. Pt. III. Melanophyceae. Univ. Calif. Publ. Bot., Vol. 8, pp. 383–898.Google Scholar
Silva, P. C. 1952. A review of nomenclatural conservation in the algae from the point of view of the type method. Univ. Calif. Publ. Bot., Vol. 25, pp. 241–324.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. 1949. The marine algae of Stronsay. Notes R. Bot. Gdn. Edinb. Vol. 20, pp. 160–79.Google Scholar
Smith, G. M. 1950. The Fresh-water Algae of the United States. 2nd ed. London.Google Scholar
Veldkamp, H. 1950. The genus Polysiphonia in the Netherlands. Blumea, Vol. 6, pp. 517–26.Google Scholar
Waern, M. 1945. Remarks on some Swedish Sphacelariaceae. Svensk. bot. Tidskr., Bd. 39, pp. 396–418.Google Scholar
Waern, M. 1952. Rocky-shore algae in the Öregrund Archipelago. Acta phytogeogr. suec, Bd. 30, 298 pp.Google Scholar