Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-4hvwz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T15:12:12.190Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The reactions of certain mysids to stimulation by light and gravity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

G. E. H. Foxon
G. E. H. Foxon
Affiliation:
From the Departments of Zoology in the University of Glasgow, and University College, Cardiff; and the Marine Station, Millport
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Light-adapted mysids as exemplified by Hemimysis lamornae display phototelotaxis which regularly alternates in sign from positive to negative and vice versa. This reaction may be disturbed by other activities such as feeding; it only takes place in horizontal illumination.

Dark-adapted mysids display negative geotaxis. When a light stimulus is given this geotaxis is reversed in sign irrespective of the direction of the incident light.

When the statocysts of the mysids are removed their responses are much more like those of planktonic creatures. In the light normal orientation is maintained by the “dorsal light reflex”, and in darkness by the “general position reflex”. In the darkness a feeble negative geotaxis is sometimes seen. In light, phototaxis is seen in both light-adapted and dark-adapted conditions; in the majority of cases it is negative but on occasion has been seen to be positive.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 24 , Issue 1 , January 1940 , pp. 89 - 97
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1940

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bauer, V., 1908. Über die reflektorische Regulierung der Schwimmbewegungen bei den Mysiden. Zeit. allg. Physiol., Bd. VIII, pp. 343–69.Google Scholar
Bethe, A., 1895. Die Otocyste von Mysis. Zool.Jahrb., Abt. Anat., Bd. VIII, pp. 544–64.Google Scholar
Buddenbrock, W. von, 1914. Über die Orientierung der Krebs in Raum. Zool. Jahrb., Abt. allg. Zool. Physiol., Bd. XXXIV, pp. 479–514.Google Scholar
Cannon, H. G. & Manton, S. M., 1927. On the feeding mechanism of a mysid crustacean, Hemimysis lamornae. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinb., Vol. LV, pp. 219–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, G. L., 1930. Change of phototropic and geotropic signs in Daphnia induced by changes of light intensity. Journ. Exp. Biol., Vol. VII, pp. 109–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, G. L. 1932. Quantitative aspects of the change of phototropic sign in Daphnia. Journ. Exp. Biol., Vol. IX, pp. 180–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, G. L. 1936. Light penetration in the Western North Atlantic and its application to biological problems. Rapp. Proc. Verb. Int. Cons. Explor. Mer., Vol. CI, Pt. 2, No. 3, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
Delage, Y., 1887. Sur une fonction nouvelle des Otocystes commes organes d'orientation locomotrice. Arch. Zool. Exper. Gen., Ser. 2, Tome v, pp. 1–26.Google Scholar
Foxon, G. E. H., 1934. Notes on the swimming methods and habits of certain crustacean larvae. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XIX, pp. 829–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foxon, G. E. H. 1936. Notes on the natural history of certain sand-dwelling Cumacea. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., Ser. 10, Vol.XVII, pp. 377–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraenkel, G., 1931. Die Mechanik der Orientierung der Tiere im Raum. Biol. Reviews, Vol. VI, pp. 36–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franz, V., 1911. Weitere Phototaxistudien. I. Zur Phototaxis bei Fischen. II. Phototaxis bei marinen Crustaceen. III. Phototaktische lokomotionsperioden bei Hemimysis. Int. Rev. Hydrobiol., Biol. Suppl., Bd. III, Dritte Ser., pp. 1–23.Google Scholar
Lochhead, J. H., 1936. Body orientation in the lower Crustacea. Nature, Lond., Vol. CXXXVIII, p. 232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menke, H., 1911. Periodische Bewegungen und ihr Zusammenhang mit Licht und Stoffwechsel. Pflüger's Archiv. ges. Physiol., Bd. CXL, pp. 37–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, F. S., 1927. The vertical distribution of plankton in the sea. Biol. Reviews, Vol. II, pp. 213–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spooner, G. M., 1933. Observations on the reactions of marine plankton to light. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XIX, pp. 385–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tattersall, W. M., 1936. The occurrence and seasonal distribution of the Mysidacea and Euphausiacea. Great Barrier Reef Expd. 1928–29, Sci. Rpts., Vol. II, pp. 277–89.Google Scholar