Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-lvtdw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-19T10:18:07.450Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Replacement of Potassium by Rubidium in Nitzschia closterium

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

F. A. Stanbury
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Various attempts have been made to substitute certain elements for those acknowledged as essential for plant growth. Using plant material, sodium is the element usually chosen as a possible substitute for potassium, but results show that whilst sodium may be taken up in fairly considerable quantities this is only possible if small amounts of potassium be present as well. Total replacement appears to be impossible (11,13,15).

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , May 1934 , pp. 931 - 939
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1934

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Allen, E. J. 1914. On the culture of the plankton diatom Thalassiosira gravida Cleve, in artificial sea-water. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., N.S., Vol. X, pp. 417–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Allen, E. J. 1919. A contribution to the quantitative study of plankton. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., N.S., Vol. XII, pp. 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Allen, E. J., and Nelson, E. W. 1907. On the artificial culture of marine plankton organisms. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., N.S., Vol. VIII, pp. 421–474.Google Scholar
4.Atkins, W. R. G. 1923. The phosphate content of fresh and salt water in its relationship to the growth of the algal plankton. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., N.S., Vol. XIII, pp. 119–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Atkins, W. R. G., and Werner, E. A. 1912. The dynamic isomerism of ammonium thiocyanate and thiocarbamide. Trans. Chem. Soc., Vol. 101, pp. 1167–1178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Atkins, W. R. G., and Werner, E. A.The influence of certain salts on the dynamic isomerism of ammonium thiocyanate and thiocarbamide. Trans. Chem. Soc., pp. 1982–1991.Google Scholar
7.Brooks, S. C. 1932. The rate of penetration of rubidium into living cells of Valonia and its relation to apparent ionic radii. Journ. Cell, and Comp. Physiol., Vol. 2, pp. 223–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Cameron, C. A. 1867. Substitution of rubidium for potassium in plants. Sci. Proc. Roy. Dub. Soc., Vol. 5, pp. 85–89.Google Scholar
9.Cameron, C. A. 1879. Preliminary notes on the absorption of selenium by plants. Sci. Proc. Roy. Dub. Soc., N.S., Vol. 2, pp. 231–233.Google Scholar
10.Gooch, F. A., and Phinney, J. I. 1892. Quantitative determination of rubidium by the spectroscope. Amer. Journ. Sci., Vol. XLIV, pp. 392–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Harshberger, J. W. 1917. Mycology and plant pathology.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Hodgetts, W. J. 1922. A study of some factors controlling periodicity of fresh water algæ in nature. New. Phy., Vol. XX.Google Scholar
13.Jost, L. 1913. Varlesungen Ürbe pflanzers physiologic.Google Scholar
14.Macallum, A. B.On the distribution of potassium in animal and vegetable cells. Journ. Physiol., Vol. 32, pp. 95–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Pfeffer, W. 1905. Physiology of plants. Vol. 1, p. 411, pp. 430 and 429.Google Scholar
16.Pfeffer, W. 1905. Physiology of plants. Vol. 3, p. 350.Google Scholar
17.Stanbury, F. A. 1931. The effect of light of different intensities, reduced selectively and non-selectively, upon the rates of growth of Nilzschia closterium. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., N.S., Vol. XVII, pp. 633–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar