Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qs9v7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T22:16:20.484Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Salinity variation in interstitial water of sand at Kames Bay, Millport, with reference to the distribution of Nereis diversicolor

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Ralph I. Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of California, Berkeley, California

Extract

The sheltered beach of Kames Bay, Millport, Isle of Cumbrae, Scotland has been the scene of several important studies on intertidal zonation (Stephen, 1929; Elmhirst, 1931; Watkin, 1942). The last paper is most comprehensive and records in detail the zonation of over twenty species of animals. In the course of the present study I have found Watkin's account very accurate, but incomplete in respect to salinity variation in the interstitial water of the sands. My attention was initially directed to Kames Bay in a search for a population of Nereis diversicolor O. F. Müller inhabitating an essentially ‘marine’ environment in respect to salinity. The suitability of Kames Bay was suggested by a statement of Watkin (1942, p. 558):

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1955

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alexander, W. B., Southgate, B. A. & Bassindale, R., 1932. The salinity of the water retained in the muddy foreshore of an estuary. J. Mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 18, pp. 297–8.Google Scholar
Bruce, J. R., 1928. Physical factors on the sandy beach. Part I. Tidal, climatic, and edaphic. J. Mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 15, 535–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, E., 1952. Some aspects of the ecology and zonation of the fauna on sandy beaches. Oikos, Vol. 4, pp. 127.Google Scholar
Elmhirst, R., 1931. Studies in the Scottish marine fauna.—The Crustacea of the sandy and muddy areas of the tidal zone. Proc. roy. Soc. Edinb., Vol. 51, pp. 169–75.Google Scholar
Emery, K. O. & Foster, J. F., 1948. Water tables in marine beaches. J. Mar. Res. Vol. 7, pp. 644–54.Google Scholar
Gunn, W., 1903. The geology of North Arran, South Bute and the Cumbraes. Mem. geol. Surv. U.K. H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Pirrie, M. E., Bruce, J. R. & Moore, H. B., 1932. A quantitative study of the fauna of the sandy beach at Port Erin. J. Mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 18, pp. 279–96.Google Scholar
Reid, D. M., 1930. Salinity interchange between sea-water in sand and overflowing fresh-water at low tide. J. Mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 16, pp. 609–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, D. M., 1932. Salinity interchange between salt water in sand and overflowing fresh water at low tide. II. J. Mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 18, pp. 299306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephen, A. C., 1929. Studies on the Scottish marine fauna: The fauna of the sandy and muddy areas of the tidal zone. Trans. roy. Soc. Edinb., Vol. 56, pp. 291306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkin, E. E., 1942. The macrofauna of the intertidal sand of Kames Bay, Millport, Buteshire. Trans. roy. Soc. Edinb., Vol. 60, pp. 543–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, G. P. & Dales, R. P., 1951. Spontaneous activity patterns in animal behaviour: the irrigation of the burrow in the polychaetes Chaetopterus variopedatus Renier and Nereis diversicolor O. F. Müller. J. Mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 29, pp. 661–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar