Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wtssw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-07T08:40:17.149Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Species of Teredo From Plymouth Waters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Marie V. Lebour
Affiliation:
Naturalist at the Plymouth Laboratory

Extract

In the many references to Teredo from Plymouth early workers assumed that the common form was T. navalis L. Orton (1913) refers to this species, but he has recently told me that he did not try to identify the species precisely. It is almost certain that he was dealing with T. norvegica Spengler, which, it is now known, is the common large species in these waters. Harington (1922) ascribes the species with which he worked at Plymouth to T. norvegica, with a query, and no doubt he identified the species correctly. Yonge (1926) states that the Teredo with which he worked from the experimental raft near Plymouth Breakwater were probably all T. norvegica. Later he identified them as that species. Unlike T. navalis it does not carry its young in a brood pouch, but sends its eggs directly into the sea.

Three species have been found in recent years from the Plymouth district, two from the experimental raft moored near the Breakwater and from other fixed wood, and one from driftwood. The two commonly occurring from the raft are (1) T. norvegica and (2) a much smaller species carrying its young in a brood pouch, closely related to, if not identical with, T. navalis. The third species, occurring occasionally in driftwood, is T. megotara Forbes & Hanley. Purchon (1941), who worked at the last species from specimens in a tank at the Plymouth Laboratory, saw no sign of a brood pouch; and in those collected later from Wembury and examined by myself it was found that the eggs, shed directly into the sea, were very numerous.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1946

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bartsch, P., 1922. A monograph of the American shipworms. Smithsonian Institution. U.S. Nat. Mus. Bull., No. 122, pp. 150.Google Scholar
Calman, W. T. & Crawford, G. I., 1936. Marine boring animals injurious to submerged structures. British Museum (Natural History) Economic Series, No. 10, pp. 138.Google Scholar
Forbes, E. & Hanley, S., 1853. A History of British Mollusca, Vol. 1, pp. 1486; Vol. IV, plates.Google Scholar
Grave, B. H., 1928. Natural history of shipworm, Teredo navalis, at Woods Hole, Massachusetts. Biol. Bull.; Vol. LV, pp. 260–82.Google Scholar
Harington, C. R., 1922. Report of work done at the Marine Biological Station, Plymouth, July 1st to Sept. 18th, 1920. Deterioration of structure of timber, metal and concrete exposed to action of sea-water. Second (Interim) Report on the Committee of the Institution of Civil Engineers, pp. 3542.Google Scholar
Jeffreys, J. G., 1865. British Conchology, Vol. III, pp. 1393; Vol. V, plates.Google Scholar
Kofoid, C. A., 1921. Report on the San Francisco Bay Marine Borers, pp. 2361.Google Scholar
Kofoid, C. A., 1922. The San Francisco Bay Marine Piling Survey. Second Annual Progress Report, Biological Section, pp. 7281.Google Scholar
Lazier, E. L., 1924. Morphology of the digestive tract of Teredo navalis. Univ. Calif. Publ. in Zool., Vol. XXII. No. 14, pp. 455–77.Google Scholar
Lebour, M. V., 1938. Notes on the breeding of some Lamellibranchs from Plymouth and their larvae. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XXIII, pp. 119–44.Google Scholar
Miller, R. C., 1922. Variations in the shell of Teredo navalis in San Francisco Bay. Univ. Calif. Publ. in Zool., Vol. XXII, No. 2, pp. 294320.Google Scholar
Nelson, Thurlow C., 1923. The European pileworm. A dangerous marine borer in Barnegat Bay, New Jersey. Circular 139, New Jersey Agricultural Experimental Station, pp. 115.Google Scholar
Nelson, Thurlow C., 1924. Report of the Department of Biology of the New Jersey Agricultural College Experimental Station, New Brunswick, N.J., for the year ending June 30th, 1923.Google Scholar
Orton, J. H., 1913. Preliminary account of a contribution to an evaluation of the sea. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. X, pp. 312–26.Google Scholar
Purchon, R. Denison, 1941. On the biology and relationships of the Lamellibranch Xylophaga dorsalis (Turton). Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XXV, pp. 189.Google Scholar
Yonge, C. M., 1926. Protandry in Teredo norvegica. Quart. Journ. Micro. Sci., Vol. LXX, pp. 391–4.Google Scholar
Yonge, C. M., 1927. Formation of calcareous tubes round the siphons of Teredo. Nature, pp. 1112.Google Scholar