Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T14:22:28.214Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Studies on the Physiology of Digestion in Corophium Volutator

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

V. P. Agrawal
Affiliation:
D.A.V. College, Muzarffarnagar, India

Extract

It has been observed that the pH in the different parts of the alimentary canal of Corophium is nearer neutrality; while the medium in the ventral hepatopancreatic caeca is more acidic, being in the neighbourhood of 6.2.

Investigations on the qualitative estimation of enzymes indicate that none of the enzymes are secreted by the gut proper. However, the ventral caeca only secrete many of the carbohydrate splitting enzymes; proteases and lipase are also secreted by the caecal cells of Corophium

It has also been estimated that the optimum pH for the activity of the caecal amylase lies in the neighbourhood of 5.8.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agrawal, V. P., 1961. Estimation of cellulase in the ventral caeca of Orchestia gammarella Pallas. Curr. Sci., Vol. 30, No. 10, p. 392.Google Scholar
Newell, G. E., 1954. The marine fauna of Whitstable. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., Ser. 12, Vol.7, pp. 321–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholls, A. G., 1931. Studies on Ligia oceanica. Part II. The process of feeding, digestion and absorption with a description of the structure of foregut. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 17, pp. 675707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Somogyi, M., 1952. Notes on sugar determination. J. biol. Chem., Vol. 195, pp. 1923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yonge, Cm., 1924. Studies on the comparative physiology of digestion. II. The mechanism of feeding, digestion and assimilation in Nephrops. Brit. J. exp. Biol., Vol. 1, pp. 343–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar