Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-vt8vv Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-08-27T12:12:37.373Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tube Formation by Pomatoceros Triqueter (Polychaeta)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

R. H. Hedley
R. H. Hedley
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, King's College, University of Durham, Newcastle upon Tyne I
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The attached tube of P. triqueter is described with special reference to the calcareous grating which is usually found inside the posterior end of damaged tubes. An explanation of the morphology of the tube, and of the calcareous grating, is attempted with reference to an account of the mode of deposition characteristic of the worm.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 37 , Issue 2 , June 1958 , pp. 315 - 322
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Dons, C. 1927. Om Vekst og voksemate hos Pomatoceros triqueter L. Nyt Mag. Naturv., Bd. 65, pp. 111–26.Google Scholar
Faouzi, H. 1931. Tube formation in Pomatoceros triqueter L. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 17, pp. 379–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedley, R. H. 1956a. Studies of serpulid tube formation. I. The secretion of the calcareous and organic components of the tube by Pomatoceros triqueter. Quart. J. micr. Sci., Vol. 97, pp. 411–9.Google Scholar
Hadley, R. H. 1956b. Studies of serpulid tube formation. II. The calcium secreting glands in the peristomium of Spirorbis, Hydroides, and Serpula. Quart. J. micr. Sci., Vol. 97, pp. 421–7.Google Scholar
Lison, L. 1936. Histochemie animale. Paris: Gauthier-Villars.Google Scholar
Mclntosh, W. C. 1923. The British Marine Annelids, Vol. 4, 538 pp. London: Ray Society.Google Scholar
Robertson, J. D. & Pantin, C. F. A. 1938. Tube formation in Pomatoceros triqueter L. Nature, Lond., Vol. 141, pp. 648–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segrove, F. 1941. The development of the serpulid Pomatoceros triqueter L. Quart. J. micr. Sci., Vol. 82, pp. 467–540.Google Scholar
Sylven, B. 1941. Uber das Verkommen von hochmolekularen Esterschwelfelsauren im Granuluationsgewebe und bei der Epithelregeneration. Acta chir. scand., Bd. 86, Suppl. 66, 151 pp.Google Scholar
Stock, A. 1949. The determination of calcium in histological sections. J. R. micr. Soc, Vol. 69, pp. 20–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, J. G. 1940. Pomatoceros, Sabella, and Amphitrite. Mem. Lpool mar. biol. Comm., No. 33, 88 pp.Google Scholar