Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-qxsvm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-26T13:35:28.923Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Use of Graphical Methods to Estimate Demographic Parameters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Alastair Grant
Affiliation:
Institute of Estuarine and Coastal Studies and Department of Applied Biology, University of Hull, Hull, HU6 7RX

Extract

The demographic parameters of a population (the number of age-classes present; growth rates; mortality as a function of age and recruitment levels) are of considerable interest to marine biologists. If individuals can be aged from growth rings in their hard parts, then the estimation of demographic parameters is relatively straightforward. If this is not possible, the next best alternative is to tag or mark individuals and use data on the recapture of these to give the information required. For many marine invertebrates, neither of these options is practical and we must resort to estimating the demographic parameters by making assumptions about recruitment and the size variation between individuals of the same age and then infer the age structure of the population from its size structure. This was first done by Petersen (1891) who interpreted each mode on a size/ frequency histogram as representing a single age-class. More recently, extensive use has been made of methods which assume that the sizes of individuals of the same age will be normally distributed. The size/frequency histogram can then be decomposed into a number of normal distributions, each of which represents a single age-class. This can be done graphically (Harding, 1949; Cassie, 1954; Bhattacharya, 1967) or with computerbased numerical methods (Macdonald & Pitcher, 1979). The graphical methods seem to be the most popular and are frequently taught to undergraduate students. The same methods can be used to dissect a size/frequency distribution into components other than age-classes (Harding, 1949), but the principles are the same.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bhattacharya, C. G., 1967. A simple method of resolution of a distribution into Gaussian components. Biometrics, 23, 115135.Google Scholar
Cassie, R. M., 1954. Some uses of probability paper in the analysis of size frequency distributions. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 5, 513522.Google Scholar
Grant, A., Morgan, P. J. & Olive, P. J. W., 1987. Use made in marine ecology of methods for estimating demographic parameters from size/frequency data. Marine Biology, 95, 201208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, J. P., 1949. The use of probability paper for the graphical analysis of polymodal frequency distributions. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 28, 141153.Google Scholar
Hasselblad, V., 1966. Estimation of parameters for a mixture of normal distributions. Technometrics, 8, 421444.Google Scholar
Macdonald, P. D. M. & Pitcher, T. J., 1979. Age-groups from size-frequency data: a versatile and efficient method of analysing distribution mixtures. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 36, 9871001.Google Scholar
Morgan, P. J., 1984. Ecological Investigations of the British Intertidal Nephtidae (Annelida: Polychaeta). PhD Thesis, Newcastle-upon Tyne.Google Scholar
Petersen, C. G. J., 1891. Eine Methode zur bestimmung des Alters und Wuchses der Fische. Mitteilungen des Deutschen Seefischereivereins, 11, 226235.Google Scholar
Titterington, D. M., Smith, A. F. M. & Makov, U. E., 1985. Statistical Analysis of Finite Mixture Distributions. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar