Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-7nlkj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-04T14:39:16.153Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Ecological Study on Laminaria Ochroleuca

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

D. M. John
D. M. John
Affiliation:
The Department of Botany, Durham University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The distribution of Laminaria ochroleuca along the south-west coast of England and the Isles of Stilly is brought up to date. The pattern of distribution is discussed with reference to certain factors controlling the ‘ performance’ and success of the species on the northernmost edge of its range. The performance of individuals of the species (measured as net stipe production) sampled from populations growing on the coast of south-west England is compared with populations from north-west Spain, where it is growing in the centre of its geographical range.

The degree of exposure to direct onshore wave action appears to govern the upper limit of its bathymetric range as well as its distribution along the south-west coast of England.

It was found possible to age this species using the method and precautions described by Kain for Laminaria hyperborea.

The stipe material sampled from the English populations had a higher ash content per gram dry weight and a higher calorific content per gram of organic material than that from the Spanish populations.

Individuals from the English population had a lower weight per unit length of stipe in all age-classes than those from Spain.

It is suggested that incident radiation may be a more important factor than temperature in controlling the northward limit of the species.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 49 , Issue 1 , February 1969 , pp. 175 - 187
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bellamy, D. J. & Holland, P. J., 1966. Determination of the net annual serial production of Calluna vulgaris (L.) Hull, in northern England. Oikos, Vol. 17, pp. 113–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellamy, D. J., Bellamy, R., John, D. M. & Whittick, A., 1967. Some effects of pollution on rooted marine macrophytes on the north-east coast of England. Br. phycol. Bull., Vol. 3, No. 2, p. 409.Google Scholar
Bellamy, D. J. & Whittick, A., 1969. Comparative studies of the performance of sublittoral ecosystems dominated by attached macrophytes. I. (In the Press.)Google Scholar
Black, W. A. P., 1950. The seasonal variation in weight and chemical composition of the common British Laminariaceae. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 29, pp. 45–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, W. A. P., Richardson, W. D. & Walker, F. T., 1959. Chemical and growth gradients of Laminaria cloustoni Edm. (L. hyperborea Fosl.). Econ. Proc. R. Soc. Dublin, Vol. 4, pp. 137–49.Google Scholar
Crisp, D. J. & Southward, A. J., 1958. The distribution of intertidal organisms along the coasts of the English Channel. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 37, pp. 157–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davy De Virville, A., 1963. Contribution à l'étude de la Flore marine des lies Anglo-Normandes. Revue gén. Bot., No. 824, pp. 1–62.Google Scholar
Dixon, P. S., 1961. List of marine algae collected in the Channel Islands during the joint meeting of the British Phycological Society and the Société Phycologique de France, September 1960. Br. phycol. Bull., Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 71–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gayral, P., 1958. Algues de la Côte atlantique marocaine. Rabat.Google Scholar
Grenager, B. & Baardseth, E., 1966. A two-stage sampling method of estimating seaweed quantities. 5th Int. Seaweed Symposium, pp. 129–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamel, G., 1931–39. Pheophycees de France. Paris.Google Scholar
Holmes, R. W., 1957. Solar radiation, submarine daylight, and photosynthesis. Geol. Soc. America, Mem. 67, Vol. 1, pp. 109–28.Google Scholar
Jensen, A. & Haug, ., 1954. Seasonal variations in the chemical composition of Alaria esculenta, Laminaria saccharina, Laminaria hyperborea and Laminaria digitata from the Norwegian coast. Rep. Norm. Inst. Seaw. Res., No. 14. Oslo.Google Scholar
John, D. M., 1967. Studies on sublittoral algal zonation in north-west Spain, involving aqua-lung diving techniques. Br. phycol. Bull., Vol. 3, No. 2, p. 410.Google Scholar
Johnson, T., 1890. Flora of Plymouth Sound and adjacent water. Preliminary paper. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 1, pp. 286–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kain, J. M., 1963. Aspects of the biology of Laminaria hyperborea. II. Age, weight and length. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 43, pp. 129–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lami, R., 1943. Notules d'algologie marine (suite). IX. Sur l'écologie et la repartition dans la Manche de Laminaria ochroleuca De La Pylaie. Bull. Lab. marit. Dinard, F. 25, pp. 75–90.Google Scholar
Lami, R., 1954. Une station normande de Laminaria ochroleuca de la Pylaie. Trav. algol., N.S., T. 1, pp. 44–5.Google Scholar
Norton, T. A., 1968. Under waterobservations on the vertical distribution of algae at St Mary's, Isles of Scilly. Br. phycol. Bull., Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 585–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odum, E. P., 1960. Organic production and turnover in old field succession. Ecology, Vol. 41, No. 1, pp. 34–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parke, M., 1948 a. Studies on British Laminariaceae. I. Growth in Laminaria saccharina (L.) Lamour. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 27, pp. 651–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parke, M., 1948 b. Laminaria ochroleuca De la Pylaie growing on the coast of Britain. Nature, Lond., Vol. 162, p. 295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parke, M., 1951. Notes on the Plymouth marine flora. Algal records for the Plymouth region. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 29, pp. 257–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penfound, W. T., 1956. Primary production of vascular aquatic plants. Limnol. Oceanogr., Vol. 1, pp. 92–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauvageau, C., 1916. Sur une Laminaire nouvelle pour les côtes de France. Laminaria Lejolisii Sauv. C. r. hebd. Séanc. Acad. Sci., T. 163, pp. 714–6.Google Scholar
Sauvageau, C., 1918. Recherches sur les Laminaires des côtes de France. Mém. Acad. Sci., Paris, T. 56, pp. 1–233.Google Scholar
Spooner, G. M., 1951. Additional records of Laminaria ochroleuca De La Pylaie. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 29, pp. 261–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biologique De Roscoff, Station, 1954. Inventaire de la flore marine de Roscoff Algues, Champignons, Lichens et Spermatophytes. Trav. Sta. biol. Roscoff, Suppl. 6,152.Google Scholar
Sundene, O., 1964. The ecology of Laminaria digitata in Norway in view of transplant experiments. Nytt Mag. Bot., Bd. 11, pp. 83–107.Google Scholar
Sverdrup, H. U., Johnson, M. W. & Fleming, R. H., 1942. The Oceans. New York: Prentice Hall Inc.Google Scholar
Tseng, C. K., Wu, C. Y. & Sun, K. Y., 1957. The effect of temperature on growth and development of Haitai (Laminaria japonica Aresch.) Ada bot. sinica, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 103–30.Google Scholar