Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T07:49:35.692Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Augmented descriptions and nomenclature of the cirratulid polychaetes Dodecaceria fimbriata and D. concharum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 January 2015

Peter H. Gibson*
Affiliation:
46 Craighouse Avenue, Edinburgh EH10 5LN, UK
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: P.H. Gibson, 46 Craighouse Avenue, Edinburgh EH10 5LN, UK email: gibson5ln@btinternet.com

Abstract

Oersted in 1843 gave a brief description of Dodecaceria concharum collected from the Kattegat. This was inadequate for identifying the species. Caullery and Mesnil in 1898 described three forms of Dodecaceria (A, B and C) but they were uncertain which form Oersted described. Dehorne in 1933 described D caulleryi (now D. fimbriata), which reproduce asexually, and Form B of Caullery and Mesnil. By default Form B became D. concharum the parthenogenetic species Form A of Caullery and Mesnil. Gibson and Heppell in 1995 in an attempt to consolidate these names deposited new types for the two species at the Cambers Street Museum in Edinburgh.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Caullery, M. and Mesnil, F. (1898) Les forms épitoques et l'evolution de cirratuliens. Annales de l'Université de Lyon 39, 1200.Google Scholar
Dehorne, A. (1933) La schizotémérie et les segments tétragemmes de Dodecaceria caulleryi n. sp. Bulletin Biologique de la France et de Belgique 67, 298326.Google Scholar
Gibson, P.H. (1974) Reproduction in the polychaete Dodecaceria concharum (Oersted) and D. caulleryi (Dehorne). University of Newcastle upon Tyne. P. 54, Fig. 4:2.Google Scholar
Gibson, P.H. (1978) Systematics of Dodecaceria (Annelida: Polychaeta) and its relationship to the reproduction of its species. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, London 63, 275287.Google Scholar
Gibson, P.H. (1981) Gametogenesis in the cirratulid polychaetes Dodecaceria concharum and D. caulleryi . Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, London 193, 355370.Google Scholar
Gibson, P.H. (1996) Distribution of the cirratulid polychaetes Dodecaceria fimbriata, D. concharum and D. diceria in European waters between latitudes 48° N and 70° N. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 76, 625635.Google Scholar
Gibson, P.H. (1997 a) The nuchal organ and nervous system of the head of four species of the cirratulid Dodecaceria . Polychaete Research 17, 68.Google Scholar
Gibson, P.H. (1997 b) The specific status of the two cirratulid polychaetes Dodecaceria fimbriata and D. caulleryi compared by their morphology and methods of reproduction. Canadian Journal of Zoology 57, 14431451.Google Scholar
Gibson, P.H. (1999) Survival of post-larval of individuals of the cirratulid polychaetes D. fimbriata and D. concharum at reduced salinity. Ophelia 51, 214221.Google Scholar
Gibson, P.H. and Clark, R.B. (1976) Reproduction of Dodecaceria caulleryi (Polychaeta: Cirratulidae). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 56, 649674.Google Scholar
Gibson, P.H. and Heppell, D. (1995) Dodecaceria concharum Örsted, 1843 and Heterocirrus fimbriatus Verrill, 1879 (currently D. fimbriata) (Annelida, Polychaeta): proposed conservation of the specific names by the designation of a neotype for D. concharum. Case 2899. Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature 52, 2733.Google Scholar
Gibson, P. and Stoddard, L. (2005) Further characterisation of chaetae: their structure and the use of computer neural networks. Porcupine Marine Natural History Society Newsletter 18, 58.Google Scholar
ICZN (2003) Dodecaceria concharum Oersted 1843 and Heterocirrus fimbriatus Verrill 1879 (currently D. fimbriata) (Annelida, Polychaeta): conservation of usage of the names by designation of a neotype for D concharum not approved. Case 2899. Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature 60, 6667.Google Scholar
Jagerskiold, L.A. (1971) A survey of marine benthonic macro-fauna along the Swedish west coast 1921–1938. Regiae Societatis Scientiaru et Litterarum Gothoburgensis – Zoologica 6, 1146.Google Scholar
Marcel, R. (1962) Sur quelques larves aberrantes de Dodecaceria concharum Oersted (Annélidae: Polychaete). Mémoires la Société des nationale Sciences Naturelles et Mathématique de Cherbourg. Tome 50, Series 5, 10, 6167.Google Scholar
Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom (1937, 1957) Plymouth marine fauna. Plymouth: Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.Google Scholar
Oersted, A.S. (1843) Annulatorum Danicorum Conspectus. Fasc. 1, Mericolae, Sumtibus Librariae Wahlianae, Hafniae, Copenhagen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raymont, J.E.G. (1963) Plankton and Productivity of the Oceans. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Rodhe, J. and Winsor, P. (2002) On the influence of the freshwater supply on the Baltic Sea mean salinity. Tellus A 54, 175186.Google Scholar