Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T22:25:38.663Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Encrusting Bryozoans on the Physiology of Their Algal Substratum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Jorge Muñoz ,
Juan M. Cancino  and
MarÍa X. Molina
Jorge Muñoz
Affiliation:
Departamento de Ciencias del Mar, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Casilla 127 Talcahuano, Chile
Juan M. Cancino
Affiliation:
Departamento de Ecologia, Facultad de Ciencias Biólogicas, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Casilla 114-D Santiago, Chile
MarÍa X. Molina
Affiliation:
Departamento de Ciencias Ecologicas, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Chile, Casilla 653 Santiago, Chile
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Traditionally, colonies of encrusting epiphytic bryozoans have been regarded as biotic factors reducing photosynthetic performance in benthic algae. In this study we determined under laboratory conditions the effects of Membranipora tuberculata on the photosynthetic efficiency of the rhodophyte Gelidium rex.

Encrusting bryozoans reduce to 44% the incident light reaching the algal thallus. However, concentrations of chlorophyll a and other accessory pigments are significantly higher in encrusted than in non-encrusted thalli. Consequently, photosynthetic efficiency is almost identical in both types of thalli. Although non-encrusted thalli showed a higher photosynthetic V due to higher levels of light reaching the algae, encrusted thalli exhibited a compensatory effect at low photon flux density and reached a similar P value. The detrimental effect of M. tuberculata on photosynthesis could be partially compensated by CO released from bryozoan cells, as G. rex preferred CO over HCO3 as a source of photosynthetic inorganic carbon. These results suggest that physiological interaction between bryozoans and algae, involving the interchange of metabolic substances, are likely to be important.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 71 , Issue 4 , November 1991 , pp. 877 - 882
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Cancino, J.M.Munoz, J.Munoz, M. & Orellana, M.C. 1987. Effects of the bryozoan Membranipora tuberculata (Bosc.) on the photosynthesis and growth of Gelidium rex Santelices & Abbott. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 113, 105–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dieckman, G.S. 1980. Aspects of the ecology of Laminaria pallida (Grev.) J. Ag. off the Cape Peninsula (South Africa). I. Seasonal growth. Botanica Marina, 23, 579–585.Google Scholar
Dixon, J.Schroeter, S.C. & Kastendiek, J. 1981. Effects of the encrusting bryozoan, Membranipora membranacea on the loss of blades and fronds by the giant kelp Macrocyst is pyrifera (Laminariales). Journal of Phycology, 17, 341–345.Google Scholar
Haldane, J.B.S. & Stern, K.G. 1932. Allgemeine Chemie der Enzyme. Dresden, Leipzig: Steinkopff Verlag.Google Scholar
Jeffrey, S.W. & Humphrey, G.F. 1975. New spectrophotometric equations for determining chlorophylls a, b, c and c in higher plants, algae and natural phytoplankton. Biochemie und Physiologies der Pflanzen, 167, 191–194.Google Scholar
Molina, X.Cancino, J.M. & Montecino, V. 1991. Cambios en los pigmentos fotosintetizadores de Gelidium rex (Rhodophyta) inducidos por el epifito Membranipora tuberculata (Bryozoa). Revista Chilena de Historia Natural, 64.Google Scholar
Oswald, R.C.Telford, N.Seed, R. & Happey-Wood, CM. 1984. The effect of encrusting bryozoans on the photosynthetic activity of Fucus serratus L. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 19, 697–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramus, J. 1981. The capture and transduction of light energy. In The Biology of Seaweeds (ed. Lobban, C.S. and Wynne, M.J.), pp. 458–492. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Richards, FA. & Thompson, T.G. 1952. The estimation and characterization of plankton populations by pigment analyses. II. A spectrophotometric method for the estimation of the plankton pigments. Journal of Marine Research, 11, 156–172.Google Scholar
Wing, B.L. & Clendenning, K.A. 1971. Kelps surfaces and associated invertebrates. In The Biology of Giant Kelp Beds (Macrocystis) in California (ed. North, W.J.), pp. 319–341. Beihefte zur Nova Hedwigia Z. Heft 32. Kryptogamenkd.Google Scholar
Woollacott, R.M. & Norths, W.J. 1971 Bryozoans of California and northern Mexico kelp beds. In The Biology of Giant Kelp Beds (Macrocystis) in California (ed. North, W.J.), pp. 455–479. Beihefte zur Nova Hedwigia Z. Heft 32, Kryptogamenkd.Google Scholar