Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wpx84 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T01:06:13.292Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Experiments on the tidal rhythm of Blennius pholis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

R. N. Gibson
Affiliation:
Marine Science Laboratories, Menai Bridge, Angleseycor1corresp
1

Extract

The endogenous tidal rhythm of the littoral fish Blennius pholis L. was studied in the laboratory. It was found that there was no difference in the mean level of activity of fish caught on spring and neap tides. The time-interval between activity peaks (the period length) gradually increased in constant darkness. A similar, although not significant, increase was also observed in continuous illumination.

There was no evidence of any diurnal component in the rhythm, but freshly caught fish subjected to alternating periods of light and darkness, equal in duration to the natural period, responded to the onset of illumination by greatly increased activity only when the light period began between activity peaks.

Fish which had been kept in the laboratory for several weeks and had lost their natural rhythm still responded to light by increased activity. This increase was not as great as that shown by freshly caught fish, however, and the response decreased with time. Evidence of re-entrainment of the natural rhythm after 7 days in alternating periods of light and darkness was not found. It was shown that feeding the fish half-way through the 12 h light-period resulted in a reduction of activity after feeding. This did not occur when the fish were fed half-way through the dark period.

A 4h cold shock of 10° C resulted in partial re-entrainment of rhymthic activity in B. pholis.

B. pholis, which alone appears to have a persistent rhythm, differs from certain other fish examined in its strictly littoral habitat and its possible need for activity periods synchronized with the tide.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aronson, L. R., 1951. Orientation and jumping behaviour in the gobiid fish Bathygobius soporator. Am. Mus. Novit., No. 1486, pp. 122.Google Scholar
Aschoff, J., 1960. Exogenous and endogenous components in circadian rhythms. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. quant. Biol., Vol. 25, pp. 1128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brian, J., 1958. Osservazioni eco-etologiche sull'alobio costiera dell'isola di Rodi. Boll. Pesca Piscic. Idrobiol., Vol. 12, pp. 110.Google Scholar
Bruce, J. R., Colman, J. S., & Jones, N. S., 1963. Marine Fauna of the Isle of Man. 307 pp. Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar
Bünning, E., 1935. Zur Kenntnis der endogen Tagesrhythmik bei Insekten und bei Pflanzen. Ber. dt. hot. Ges., Bd. 53, pp. 594623.Google Scholar
Bünning, E., 1963. The Physiological Clock. 145 pp. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Cloudsley-Thompson, J. L., 1958. Studies in diurnal rhythms. VIII. The endogenous chronometer in Gryllus campestris L. (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). J. Insect Physiol, Vol. 2, pp. 175–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cloudsley-Thompson, J. L., 1961. Rhythmic Activity in Animal Physiology and Behaviour. 236 pp. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Davis, R. E., 1963. Daily ‘predawn’ peak of locomotion in fish. Anim. Behav., Vol. 12, pp. 272–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enright, J. T., 1963. The tidal rhythm of a sand beach amphipod. Z. vergl. PhysioL, Bd. 46, pp. 276313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fingerman, M., 1960. Tidal rhythmicity in marine organisms. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. quant. Biol., Vol. 25, pp. 481–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fishelson, L., 1963. Observations on the littoral fishes of Israel. I. Behaviour of Blennius pavo Risso. (Teleostei, Blenniidae). Israel J. Zool, Vol. 12, pp. 6780.Google Scholar
Gibson, R. N., 1965. Rhythmic activity in littoral fish. Nature, Lond., Vol. 207, pp. 544–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gompel, M., 1937. Recherches sur la consommation d'oxygène de quelques animaux littoraux. C. r. Séanc. hebd. Acad. Sci., Paris, T. 205, pp. 816–18.Google Scholar
Gosse, P. H., 1877. A Year at the Shore. 330 pp. London: Daldy, Isbister and Co.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harder, W. & Hempel, G., 1954. Studien zur Tagesperiodik der Aktivitat von Fischen. I. Versuche an Plattfischen. Kurze Mitt. Inst. Fisch. Biol. Univ. Hamb., No. 5, pp. 2231.Google Scholar
Harker, J. E., 1958. Diurnal rhythms in the animal kingdom. Biol. Rev., Vol. 33, pp. 152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruuk, H., 1963. Diurnal periodicity in the activity of the common sole Solea vulgaris Quensel. Neth. J. Sea Res., Vol. 2, pp. 128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naylor, E., 1963. Temperature relationships in the locomotor rhythm of Carcinus. J. exp. Biol., Vol. 40, pp. 669–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pittendrigh, C. S., 1954. On temperature independence in the clock system controlling emergence in Drosophila. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., Vol. 40, pp. 1018–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pittendrigh, C. S., 1958. Perspectives in the study of biological clocks. In Perspectives in Marine Biology, ed. Buzzati-Traverso, A. A.. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Qasim, S. Z., 1957. The biology of Blennius pholis L. (Teleostei). Proc. zool. Soc. Lond., Vol. 128, pp. 161208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spoor, W. A., 1941. A method of measuring the activity of fishes. Ecology, Vol. 22, PP. 329–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, G. C., 1957. Homing behaviour of California rocky shore fishes. Univ. Calif. Publs Zool., Vol. 59, pp. 249–84.Google Scholar