Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-89wxm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T08:17:48.240Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The growth stages of the lophophore of the brachiopods Platidia davidsoni (Eudes Deslongchamps) and P. anomioides (Philippi), with notes on the feeding mechanism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

D. Atkins
Affiliation:
Plymouth Laboratory

Extract

The lophophore of Platidia, as illustrated in most memoirs and text-books, bears little resemblance to its appearance in life, no doubt because such illustrations and the accompanying descriptions were based on dried specimens. The lophophore of Platidia has been considered to be of a peculiar sigmoid type, differing from that of any other known lophophore. The dredging by R.V. ‘Sarsia’ of three species of the genus in recent years has afforded the opportunity of figuring the lophophore in its natural state, and the working out of its growth stages in P. davidsoni and P. anomioides: these were previously unknown for any species of Platidia. The third species, a new one, is described separately (Atkins, 1959).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1959

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atkins, D., 1936. On the ciliary mechanisms and interrelationships of lamellibranchs. Pt. I. Quart. J. micr. Sri., Vol. 79, pp. 181308.Google Scholar
Atkins, D., 1956. Ciliary feeding mechanisms of brachiopods. Nature, Lond., Vol. 177, pp. 706–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkins, D., 1958. A new species and genus of Kraussinidae (Brachiopoda) with a note on feeding. Proc. zool. Soc. Lond., Vol. 131, pp. 559–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkins, D., 1959. A new species of Platidia (Brachiopoda) from the La Chapelle Bank region. J. mar biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 38, pp. 133–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beecher, C. E., 1893. Revision of the families of loop-bearing Brachiopoda. Trans. Conn. Acad. Arts Sci., Vol. 9, pp. 376–91.Google Scholar
Beecher, C. E., 1895. The development of Terebratalia obsoleta Dall. Trans. Conn. Acad. Arts. Sci., Vol. 9, pp. 392–9.Google Scholar
Costa, O. G., 1852. Fauna del Regno di Napoli (Not seen.)Google Scholar
Dall, W. H., 1921. Annotated list of the recent Brachiopoda in the collection of the United States National Museum, with descriptions of thirty-three new forms. Proc. U.S. nat. Mus., Vol. 57, pp. 261377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, T., 1852 a. Sketch of a classification of recent Brachiopoda; based upon internal organization. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., Ser. 2, Vol. 9, pp. 361–77.Google Scholar
Davidson, T., 1852 b. Additions and corrections to Mr Davidson's paper on the classification of the Brachiopoda. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., Ser. 2, Vol. 9, p. 514.Google Scholar
Davidson, T., 1852 c. Descriptions of a few new recent species of Brachiopoda. Proc. zool. Soc. Lond., 1852 (Part 20), pp. 75–83. 1880. Report on the Brachiopoda dredged by H.M.S. ‘Challenger’ during the years 1873–1876. 'Challenger’ Rep., Vol. 1, pp. 167.Google Scholar
Davidson, T., 1887. A monograph of recent Brachiopoda. Part 11. Trans. Linn. Soc. Lond. (Zool.), Ser. 2, Vol. 4, pp. 75182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, G. F., 1949. The brachial development of Kraussina (Brachiopoda). Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., Ser. 12, Vol. 2, pp. 538–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eudes Deslongchamps, E. J/ 1855. On a new species of Morrisia. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., Ser. 2, Vol. 16, pp. 443–4.Google Scholar
Fischer, P., 1872. Brachiopodes des côtes océeaniques de France. J. Conchyliol., T. 20, pp. 160–4.Google Scholar
Fischer, P., 1873. Faune conchyliologique marine du department de la Gironde et des côtes du sud-ouest de la France. Act. Soc. linn. Bordeaux, T. 29, (Sér. 3, T. 9), pp. 193255.Google Scholar
Fischer, P. & Oehlert, D.-P., 1891. Brachiopodes. Exped.sci. Travailleur et Talisman, 140 pp.Google Scholar
Hancock, A., 1858. On the organization of the Brachiopoda. Phil. Trans., Vol. 148, pp. 791869.Google Scholar
Jeffreys, J. G., 1878. On the Mollusca procured during the ‘Lightening’ and ‘Porcupine’ Expeditions, 1868–70. (Part 1). Proc. zool. Soc. Lond., 1878, PP. 393416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight-Jones, E. W., 1954. Relations between metachronism and the direction of ciliary beat in Metazoa. Quart. J. micr. Sci., Vol. 95, pp. 503–21.Google Scholar
Lucas, A. M., 1931. An investigation of the nervous system as a possible factor in the regulation of ciliary activity of the lamellibranch gill. J. Morph., Vol. 51, pp. 147–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massy, A. L., 1925. The Brachiopoda of the coasts of Ireland. Proc. R. Irish Acad., Vol. 37, pp. 3746.Google Scholar
Morse. E. S., 1871. On the early stages of Terebratulina septentrionalis (Couthouy). Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., Ser. 4, Vol. 8, pp. 414–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Percival, E., 1944. A contribution to the life-history of the brachiopod, Tere- bratella inconspicua Sowerby. Trans, roy. Soc. N.Z., Vol. 74, pp 123.Google Scholar
Philippi, R. A., 1836. Enumeratio Molluscorum Siciliae. Vol. 1.Google Scholar
Philippi, R. A., 1844. Enumeratio Molluscorum Siciliae, Vol. 2.Google Scholar
Prenant, M., 1928. Notes histologiques sur Terebratulina caput-serpentis L. Bull. Soc. zool. Fr., T. 53, pp. 113–25.Google Scholar
Richards, J. R., 1952. The ciliary feeding mechanism of Neothyris lenticularis (Deshayes). J. Morph., Vol. 90, pp. 6592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senn, E., 1934. Die Geschlechtsverhaltnisse der Brachiopoden, im besonderen die Spermato- und Oogenese der Gattung Lingula. Acta zool., Stockh., Bd. 15, pp. 1152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, J. A., 1927. Brachiopod morphology and genera (recent and tertiary). N.Z. Bd Sci. Art, Manual 7.Google Scholar
Williams, A., 1956. The calcareous shell of the Brachiopoda and its importance to their classification. Biol. Rev., Vol. 31 pp. 243–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar