Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-68ccn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-15T16:15:24.897Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The intertidal fauna of the Mersey estuary

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

R. Bassindale
R. Bassindale
Affiliation:
Assistant Lecturer in Zoology, Manchester University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The 37 sq. miles of intertidal banks in the Mersey Estuary have been surveyed and classified according to their nature and fauna.

Half the banks occur in the Outer and half in the Upper Estuary. Four-fifths of the total area is composed of sand and most of the remaining one-fifth of mud occurs in the Upper Estuary.

The burrowing fauna of the Outer Estuary is abundant and varied; that of the Upper Estuary is abundant but not varied.

The distribution of species in the Mersey Estuary is similar to that in the estuaries of the River Tees and Tay, except that in the Mersey Estuary a sudden drop in the numbers of species occurs at Rock Light. This is attributed o t the strong tidal streams in the Narrows.

The densely inhabited banks of the Upper Estuary are mainly composed of mud and are situated high in the shore zone. In the Outer Estuary the densely inhabited banks are of muddy sand with some banks of mud and are situated near the low-water mark in sheltered positions.

The burrowing species of the Upper Estuary also occur, with many others, in the Outer Estuary.

The observations described in this paper were made during an investigation of the estuary of the River Mersey by the Water Pollution Board of the Department of Scientific and Industrial Research and the results are published by permission of the Department.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 23 , Issue 1 , November 1938 , pp. 83 - 98
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1938

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Fauvel, P., 1923. Polychètes Errantes. Faune de France, Vol. 5.Google Scholar
Forbes, E. & Hanley, S., 1853. A History of British Mollusca and their Shells. London. Vols. I’IV.Google Scholar
Fraser, J. H., 1932. Observations on the fauna and constituents of an estuarine mud in a polluted area. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., N.S., Vol. XVIII, p. 69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, J. H., 1935. The fauna of the Liverpool Bay Shrimping Grounds and the Morecombe bay Prawning Grounds as revealed by the use of a beam trawl. Proc. Trans. Liverpool Biol. Soc., p. 65.Google Scholar
Fraser, J. H., 1938. The fauna of fixed and floating structures in the Mersey Estuary and Liverpool Bay. Proc. Liverpool Biol. Soc., Vol. LI, pp. 1–21.Google Scholar
Ghazzawi, F. M., 1933. The littoral diatoms of the Liverpool and Port Erin shores. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc, Vol. XIX, p. 165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hincks, T., 1880. British Marine Polyzoa. London.Google Scholar
Water Pollution Research, 1935. Alexander, W. B., Southgate, B. A. and Bassindale, R. Survey of the River Tees. Part II. The Estuary—Chemical and Biological. Dept. Sci. Indus. Res., Water Pollution Research Technical Paper, No. 5. H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Water Pollution Research, 1937. Effect of discharge of crude sewage into the estuary of the River Mersey on the amount and hardness of the deposit in the Estuary. Dept. Sci. Industr. Res., Water Pollution Research Technical Paper, No. 7. H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar