Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-rvbq7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T02:30:14.090Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Non-indigenous marine macroalgae in native communities: a case study in the British Isles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2008

Frederic Mineur ,
Mark P. Johnson  and
Christine A. Maggs
Frederic Mineur*
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University of Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast BT9 7BL, UK
Mark P. Johnson
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University of Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast BT9 7BL, UK
Christine A. Maggs
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University of Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast BT9 7BL, UK
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: Frédéric Mineur School of Biological SciencesQueen's University of Belfast97 Lisburn Road, Belfast BT9 7BL, UK email: f.mineur@qub.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It has traditionally been considered that areas with high natural species richness are likely to be more resistant to non-indigenous species than those with lower numbers of species. However, this theory has been the subject of a debate over the last decade, since some studies have shown the opposite trend. In the present study, a macroalgal survey was carried out at 24 localities in Northern Ireland and southern England, using a quadrat approach in the lower littoral. The two opposing hypotheses were tested (negative versus positive relationship between native and non-indigenous species richness) in this marine environment. The effect of the presence of ‘impacts’, potential sources of disturbance and species introduction (e.g. marina, harbour or aquaculture), was also tested. A positive relationship was found between the number of non-indigenous species and the native species richness at the three different scales tested (quadrats, sites and localities). At no scale did a richer native assemblage appear to restrict the establishment of introduced species. The analyses revealed greater species richness and different community composition, as well as more non-indigenous species, in southern England relative to Northern Ireland. The presence of the considered impacts had an effect on the community composition and species richness in southern England but not in Northern Ireland. Such impacts had no effect on the non-indigenous species richness in either area.

Keywords

exotic speciesseaweedsrocky shore communitiesdiversityspecies richnessinvasibility
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 88 , Issue 4 , August 2008 , pp. 693 - 698
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arenas, F., Bishop, J.D.D., Carlton, J.T., Dyrynda, P.J., Farnham, W.F., Gonzalez, D.J., Jacobs, M.W., Lambert, C., Lambert, G., Nielsen, S.E., Pederson, J.A., Porter, J.S., Ward, S. and Wood, C.A. (2006) Alien species and other notable records from a rapid assessment survey of marinas on the south coast of England. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 86, 1329–1337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boudouresque, C.F. and Verlaque, M. (2002) Biological pollution in the Mediterranean Sea: invasive versus introduced macrophytes. Marine Pollution Bulletin 44, 32–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Britton-Simmons, K.H. (2004) Direct and indirect effects of the introduced alga Sargassum muticum on benthic, subtidal communities of Washington State, USA. Marine Ecology Progress Series 277, 61–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cabioc'h, J. and Magne, F. (1987) Première observation du Lomentaria hakodatensis (Lomentariaceae, Rhodophyta) sur les côtes françaises de la Manche (Bretagne Occidentale). Cryptogamie, Algologie 8, 41–48.Google Scholar
Clarke, K.R. and Warwick, R.R. (1994) Change in marine communities: an approach to statistical analyses and interpretation. Plymouth: Plymouth Marine Laboratory and Natural Environment Research Council, UK.Google Scholar
Coles, S.L., De Felice, R.C., Eldredge, L.G. and Carlton, J.T. (1999) Historical and recent introductions of non-indigenous marine species into Pearl Harbor, Oahu, Hawaiian Islands. Marine Biology 135, 147–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connell, J.H. (1978) Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. Science 199, 1302–1310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Connell, S.D. (2000) Floating pontoons create novel habitats for subtidal epibiota. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 247, 183–194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Critchley, A.T., Farnham, W.F. and Morrell, S.L. (1983) A chronology of new European sites of attachment for the invasive brown alga, Sargassum muticum, 1973–1981. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 63, 799–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curiel, D., Bellemo, G., Marzocchi, M., Scattolin, M. and Parisi, G. (1998) Distribution of introduced Japanese macroalgae Undaria pinnatifida, Sargassum muticum (Phaeophyta) and Antithamnion pectinatum (Rhodophyta) in the Lagoon of Venice. Hydrogiologia 385, 17–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, K.F., Harrison, S., Safford, H.D. and Viers, J.H. (2007) Productivity alters the scale dependence of the diversity–invasibility relationship. Ecology 88, 1940–1947.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elton, C. (1958) The ecology of invasions by plants and animals. London, UK: Methuen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eno, N.C., Clark, R.A. and Sanderson, W.G. (1997) Non-native marine species in British waters: a review and directory. Peterborough: Joint Nature Conservation Committee.Google Scholar
Farnham, W.F. (1980) Studies on aliens in the marine flora of southern England. In Price, J.H. et al. (eds) The shore environment, volume 2: ecosystems. London, Academic Press, pp. 875–914. [Systematics Association Special Volume, No. 17B.]Google Scholar
Farrell, P. and Fletcher, R.L. (2006) An investigation of dispersal of the introduced brown alga Undaria pinnatifida (Harvey) Suringar and its competition with some species on the man-made structures of Torquay Marina (Devon, UK). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 334, 236–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, J.F. and Connell, J.H. (1979) Intermediate-disturbance hypothesis. Science 204, 1344–1345.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hardy, F.G. and Guiry, M.D. (2003) A check-list and atlas of the seaweeds of Britain and Ireland. London: The British Phycological Society.Google Scholar
Hoek, C.Van den, and Donze, M. (1967) Algal phytogeography of the European Atlantic coasts. Blumea 15, 63–89.Google Scholar
Holloway, M.G. and Connell, S.D. (2002) Why do floating structures create novel habitats for subtidal epibiota? Marine Ecology Progress Series 235, 43–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, J., Ruitton, S., Verlaque, M. and Boudouresque, C.F. (2005) Species introductions, diversity and disturbances in marine macrophyte assemblages in the north-western Mediterranean Sea. Marine Ecology Progress Series 290, 79–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knott, N.A., Underwood, A.J., Chapman, M.G. and Glasby, T.M. (2004) Epibiota on vertical and on horizontal surfaces on natural reefs and on artificial structures. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 84, 1117–1130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Law, R. and Morton, R.D. (1996) Permanence and the assembly of ecological communities. Ecology 77, 762–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lonsdale, W.M. (1999) Global patterns of plant invasions and the concept of invasibility. Ecology 80, 1522–1536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montoya, D., Rodriguez, M.A., Zavala, M.A. and Hawkins, B.A. (2007) Contemporary richness of holarctic trees and the historical pattern of glacial retreat. Ecography 30, 173–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Occhipinti-Ambrogi, A. and Sheppard, C. (2007) Marine bioinvasions: a collection of reviews. Marine Pollution Bulletin 55, 299–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piazzi, L., Balata, D., Ceccherelli, G. and Cinelli, F. (2005) Interactive effect of sedimentation and Caulerpa racemosa var. cylindracea invasion on macroalgal assemblages in the Mediterranean Sea. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 64, 467–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, G.R., Quinn, J.F. and Stanton, M.L. (1995) Invasibility of experimental habitat islands in a California winter annual grassland. Ecology 76, 786–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffelke, B., Smith, J.E. and Hewitt, C.L. (2006) Introduced macroalgae—a growing concern. Proceedings of the International Seaweed Symposium. Journal of Applied Phycology 18, 529–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suchanek, T.H. (1994) Temperate coastal marine communities: biodiversity and threats. American Zoologist 34, 100–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verlaque, M. (1994) Checklist of introduced plants in the Mediterranean: origins and impact on the environment and human activities. Oceanologica Acta 17, 1–23.Google Scholar
Verlaque, M. and Fritayre, P. (1994) Mediterranean algal communities are changing in the face of the invasive alga Caulerpa taxifolia (Vahl) C. Agardh. Oceanologica Acta 17, 659–672.Google Scholar
Westbrook, M.A. (1930) Notes on the distribution of certain marine red algae. Journal of Botany 68, 257–264.Google Scholar
Westbrook, M.A. (1934) Antithamnion spirographidis Schiffner. Journal of Botany 72, 65–68.Google Scholar
Williamson, M. and Fitter, A. (1996) The varying success of invaders. Ecology 77, 1661–1666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar