Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-txr5j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T13:54:18.819Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Notes on the breeding of some lamellibranchs from Plymouth and their larvae

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Marie V. Lebour
Marie V. Lebour
Affiliation:
Naturalist at the Plymouth Laboratory
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A study of the larval stages of different lamellibranchs from Plymouth with a view to determining their importance in the plankton has brought out some interesting facts. It is well known that the free-swimming larvae are much simpler than most of the gastropod veligers, and that the velum is usually entire, having rarely a slight indentation, showing a tendency to be bilobed in the larger forms. They thus resemble in this respect the primitive gastropods. In many of them the velum is lost early in life, and usually the change in form of the shell takes place after metamorphosis. The post-larval growth is therefore an important part of the life history. The first shelled stage is so similar in all species that it is almost impossible to distinguish the different early veligers in the plankton, but in certain cases fertilizations have been made and the larvae reared until they have lost the velum and descend to the bottom when the species, or at least the genus, can usually be identified.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 23 , Issue 1 , November 1938 , pp. 119 - 144
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1938

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Drew, G. A., 1901. The life history of Nucula delphinodonta (Mighels). Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci., N.S., Vol. XLIV, pp. 313–91.Google Scholar
Haas, F., 1929, 1937. Klassen und Ordnungen des Tierreichs. Bivalvia, I, pp. 1–984; II, pp. 1–208.Google Scholar
Kändler, R.. 1926. Muschellarven aus dem Helgolander Plankton. Wiss. Meeresuntersuch., Bd. XVI (5), Abt. Helgoland, pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
Lebour, M. V., 1921. The food of young clupeoids. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc, Vol. XII, pp. 458–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebour, M. V., 1922. The food of plankton organisms. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc, Vol. XII, pp. 644–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebour, M. V., 1927. Studies of the Plymouth Brachyura. I. The rearing of crabs in captivity with a description of the larval stages of Inachus Dorsettensis, Macropodia longirostris and Maia squinado. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc, Vol. XIV, pp. 795–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebour, M. V., 1937 Larval and post-larval Lima from Plymouth. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc, Vol. XXI, 2, pp. 705–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebour, M. V., 1938. The life history of Kellia suborbicularis. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc, Vol. XXII, pp. 447–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovèn, G., 1848. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Entwicklung der Mollusca. Acephala Lamellibranchia. Abhandl. K. Schwed. Ak. Wiss. 1848. (Republished in 1879 at Stockholm with additional notes, pp. 1–39.)Google Scholar
Matthews, A., 1913. Notes on the development of Mytilus edulis and Alcyonium digitatum in the Plymouth Laboratory. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc, Vol. IX, pp. 557–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyazaki, I., 1935. On the development of some marine bivalves, with special reference to the shelled larvae. Journ. Imp. Fisher. Inst., Vol. XXXI, No. 1, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
Miyazaki, I., 1936 a. On the development of some marine bivalves, with special reference to the shelled larvae. II. Journ. Imper. Fish. Inst., Vol. XXXI, No. 2, pp. 35–41.Google Scholar
Miyazaki, I., 1936 b. On the development of bivalves belonging to the genus Corbicula. Bull. Jap. Soc. Sci. Fisheries, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 249–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odhner, N. H., 1914. Notizen iiber die Faune der Adria bei Rovigno. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Marinen Molluskenfauna von Rovigno in Istrien. Zool. Anz., Bd. XLIV, Heft 2, pp. 145–70.Google Scholar
Pelseneer, P., 1926. Notes d'embryologie malacologique. Ponte et dèveloppement de Cypraea europaea, Triforis perversa et Lucina lactea. Bull. Biol. France et Belg., Tome LX, pp. 88–112.Google Scholar
Sigerfoos, C. P., 1908. Natural history, organization and late development of the Teredinidae or Ship-worms. Bull. Bur. Fish. Washington, Vol. XXVII, pp. 191–231.Google Scholar
Thorson, G., 1935. Biologische Studien über die Lamellibranchier Modiolaria discors L. und Modiolaria nigra Gray in Ostgrönland. Zool. Anz., Bd. CXI, Heft 11–12, pp. 297–304.Google Scholar
Winckworth, R., 1932. The British Marine Mollusca. Journ. Conch., Vol. XIX, No. 7, pp. 211–52.Google Scholar