Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-8zxtt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T04:32:52.386Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Observations on Nucula Turgida Marshall and N. Moorei Winckworth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

J. A. Allen
J. A. Allen
Affiliation:
Zoology Department, The University, Glasgow, and the Marine Station, Millport
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the course of a study of the British Nuculidae the specific characters of a large number of specimens of N. turgida and N. moorei were re-examined. It was found that no distinction could be made between the two.

Examination of variation in shell colour showed that it was not possible to differentiate into two distinct types. There was a continuous graded seiies from a dark purple-grey in which the basic yellow colour was almost completely masked, through a series with decreasing numbers of purple-grey radiations, to shells in which the markings could not be differentiated as rays, and finally to shells without purple coloration. The purple-grey colour is not necessarily laid down continuously, and it does not develop until the end of the second year. As the shells get older an increasing percentage of them become coloured.

Although the two types of faecal pellets described by Moore were found they could not be associated with the radiate and non-radiate shell types. The five grooved faeces that he claimed were typical of the radiate variety, were found in only three of the fifty-six specimens examined. Only one of them was from a definitely radiate shell.

Shell measurements and growth rates were studied, and no feature was found on which two forms could be separated. Samples show that reproduction takes place at the same time in the rayed and unrayed shells.

As the name N. nitida Sowerby is preoccupied it is suggested that the name N. turgida Marshall should now be used with N. moorei a synonym of it.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 31 , Issue 3 , February 1953 , pp. 515 - 528
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1953

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bernard, F., 1896. Sur le developpement et la morphologie de la coquille chez les Lamellibranches. 3. Anisomyaires. Bull. Soc. Geolog. France, T. 24, pp. 412–49.Google Scholar
Comfort, A., 1951. The pigmentation of molluscan shells. Biol. Rev., Vol. 26, pp. 285–301.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. A. & Yates, F., 1948. Statistical Tables for Biological, Agricultural an Medical Research. 112 pp. London.Google Scholar
Forbes, E. & Hanley, S., 1853. A History of the British Mollusca, and their Shells. Vol. 11. London.Google Scholar
Jeffreys, J. G., 1865. British Conchology. Vol. II. London.Google Scholar
Jeffreys, J. G., 1879. On the Mollusca procured during the 'Lightning' and 'Porcupine' Expeditions, 1868–70. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 1879, pp. 553–88.Google Scholar
Lebour, M.J 1938. Notes on the breeding of some lamellibranchs from Plymouth and their larvae. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc, Vol. 23, pp. 377–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leckenby, F. & Marshall, J. T., 1875. North sea dredging. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., Vol. 16, pp. 390–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, J. T., 1893. Additions to 'British Conchology'. Journ. Conch., Vol. 7, pp. 241–65.Google Scholar
Moore, H. B., 1931a. The specific identification of faecal pellets. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc, Vol. 17, pp. 359–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, H. B., 1931b. The systematic value of molluscan faeces. Proc. Malacol. Soc., Vol. 29, pp. 281–90.Google Scholar
Winckworth, R., 1930. Notes on nomenclature. Proc. Malacol. Soc, Vol. 29, pp. 14–15.Google Scholar
Winckworth, R., 1931. On Nucula nitida Sowerby. Proc. Malacol. Soc, Vol. 29, pp. 280–1.Google Scholar
Winckworth, R., 1932. The British Marine Mollusca. Journ. Conch., Vol. 19, pp. 211–52.Google Scholar