Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-09T23:59:10.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the Development of Muggiaea Atlantica Cunningham

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

F. S. Russell
Affiliation:
Naturalist at the Plymouth Laboratory

Extract

In September 1937 Muggiaea atlantica Cunningham was very abundant off Plymouth. The presence of large numbers of eudoxids in the plankton afforded an opportunity to rear the early stages of this siphonophore. The development of M. kochi (Will) was worked out by Chun (1882, 1913), and he also described the eudoxid of that species. The eudoxid of M. atlantica has, however, never been described for certain. The allocation of eudoxids collected in the plankton to their respective species is necessarily fraught with uncertainty when more than one species is present. Throughout the whole of September 1937 M. atlantica was the only species of siphonophore to be found off Plymouth, and there can be no reasonable doubt that the eudoxids described below belonged to that species and that the development of the early stages from their eggs is that of M. atlantica.

For the terminology used in the description of the eudoxid I have followed Totton (1932), to whom I am grateful for helpful advice.

The Eudoxid

The bract (Fig. 2 a) is cone-shaped with a broad flat suture running from its apex to the base. The edges of the suture are raised into a slight flange. The right edge is continued downwards into a sweeping curve while the left edge cuts away horizontally at its lower end; the bract is thus asymmetrical. There is a slight cavity on the lower surface in which the somatocyst is centrally placed. The general form of the bract can also be seen in the different views of the whole eudoxid given in Fig. 1.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1938

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chun, , Carl, , 1882. Über die cyklische Entwickelung und die Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse der Siphonophoren. Sitz. König. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin, Phys. Math. Kl., Bd. LII, pp. 1155–72.Google Scholar
Chun, , Carl, , 1913. Über den Wechsel der Glocken bei Siphonophoren. Ber. Verh. König. Sächs. Ges. Wiss. Leipzig, Math.-Phys. Kl., Bd. LXV, pp. 27–41.Google Scholar
Moser, F., 1925. Die Siphonophoren der Deutschen Südpolar-Expedition 1901–1903, zugleich eine neue Darstellung der ontogenetischen und phylogenetischen Entwickelung dieser Klasse. Deutsche Südpolar-Exped., Bd. xvii, Zoologie, Bd. ix, pp. 1541.Google Scholar
Russell, F. S., 1934. On the occurrence of the siphonophores Muggiaea atlantica Cunningham and Muggiaea kochi (Will) in the English Channel. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc, Vol. xix, pp. 555–8.Google Scholar
Totton, A. K., 1932. Siphonophora. Great Barrier Reef Exp. 1928–29. Sci. Rep., Vol. iv, No. 10, pp. 317–74, Brit. Mus. (Nat. Hist.).Google Scholar