Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-ckgrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T13:58:21.056Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Rearing animals in captivity for the study of trematode life histories. II

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Extract

The advantage of using laboratory-reared animals in the elucidation of trematode life histories is now generally recognized (Palombi, 1938; Stunkard, 1938, etc.). Further researches seem to emphasize this point. No matter how carefully controls are examined and no matter how precise is the morphological comparison between cercaria, metacercaria and adult fluke, the fact that the intermediate and final hosts have been exposed to previous infection in the wild—particularly by closely related species of worms—immediately detracts from the value of the experiments.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1940

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Krumbiegel, I., 1935. Gefangenhaltung und Farbwechsel der Wiesel. Zool. Garten Leipzig, Vol. VIII pp. 815.Google Scholar
Palombi, A., 1938. Metodi impiegati per lo studio dei cicli evolutivi dei Trematodi digenetici. Materiale per la conoscenza della biologia di Podocotyle atomon (Rud.). Livro Jubilar Prof. Travassos, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, pp. 371–9.Google Scholar
Rothschild, M., 1936. Rearing animals in captivity for the study of trematode life histories. I. Larus ridibundus L., the black-headed gull. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XXI, pp. 143–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stunkard, H. 1938. The morphology and life cycle of the trematode Himasthla quissetensis (Miller and Northup, 1926). Biol. Bull. Vol. LXXV, No. 1, pp. 145–64, 2 pls.CrossRefGoogle Scholar