Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-txr5j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-13T13:06:40.523Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Recent Investigations into the Distribution of Regular Echinoids in the North Sea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

G. J. Cranmer
G. J. Cranmer
Affiliation:
Marine Benthos Laboratory, Luton College of Higher Education, Putteridge Bury, Luton, Bedfordshire LU2 8LE
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A major contribution to our understanding of the distribution and taxonomy of echinoids in British waters was made by Mortensen (1927, 1928–1951). Many earlier qualitative investigations (e.g. Süssbach & Breckner, 1911; Brattström, 1941) which dealt only with limited areas, were combined in Mortensen (1928–1951) to produce an overall assessment of the North Sea echinoid fauna.

In his discussion paper Ursin (1960) synthesized findings from his 20 year grab sample survey with the work of others to produce a valuable quantitative analysis of the echinoids of the central North Sea (54–5 8° N).

In recent years (1977–1983) participation on demersal fish surveys in the North Sea has enabled the distribution and population structure of the macroepibenthic component of the water column to be recorded (Dyer et al. 1982, 1983; Cranmer, Fry & Dyer, 1984).

Although this present study has added no new echinoid species to the fauna it has given a detailed picture of echinoid distribution in the area.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 65 , Issue 2 , May 1985 , pp. 351 - 357
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brattström, H., 1941. Studien über die Echinodermen des Gebietes zwischen Skagerrak und Ostsee. Undersökninger ōver Öresund, 27, 329 pp.Google Scholar
Cranmer, G. J., Fry, P. D. & Dyer, M. F., 1984. Further results from headline camera surveys in the North Sea. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 64, 335–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyer, M. F., Fry, W. G., Fry, P. D. & Cranmer, G. J., 1982. A series of North Sea benthos surveys with trawl and headline camera. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 62, 297–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyer, M. F., Fry, W. G., Fry, P. D. & Cranmer, G. J., 1983. Benthic regions within the North Sea. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 63, 683–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, J. H., 1939. The distribution of Chaetognatha in Scottish waters in 1933. Journal du Conseil, 14, 25–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, J. H., 1952. The Chaetognatha and other zooplankton of the Scottish area and their value as biological indicators of hydrographic conditions. Marine Research, 1952(2), 52 pp.Google Scholar
Hagmeier, A. & Kändler, R., 1927. Neue Untersuchungen im nordfriesischen Watenmeer und auf den fisklischen Austernbanken. Wissenschaftliche Meeresuntersuchungen der Kommission zur vnssenschaftlichen Untersuchung der deutschen Meere (Abteilung Helgoland), 16(6), 90 pp.Google Scholar
Mortensen, T., 1927. Handbook of the Echinoderms of the British Isles, 471 pp. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mortensen, T., 1928–1951. A Monograph of the Echinoidea, vols. I-V. Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Süssbach, S. & Breckner, A., 1911. Die Seeigel, Seesterne und Schlangensterne die Nord- und Ostsee. Wissenschaftliche Meeresuntersuchungen der Kommission zur wissenschaftlichen Untersuchung der deutschen Meere (Abteilung Kiel), 12, 167–302.Google Scholar
Ursin, E., 1960. A quantitative investigation of the echinoderm fauna of the central North Sea. Meddelelser fra Danmarks Fiskeri- og Havundersagelser, 2(24), 204 pp.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. P. & Armstrong, F. A. J.Biological differences between seawaters: experiments in 1953. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 33, 347–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wythe, Cooke C., 1957. Echinoids. Report. Geological Society of America, 67(1), 1191–1192.Google Scholar