Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-fb4gq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T04:48:06.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Startle Response in Herring: The Effect of Sound Stimulus Frequency, Size of Fish and Selective Interference With The Acoustico-Lateralis System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

J. H. S. Blaxter  and
D. E. Hoss
J. H. S. Blaxter
Affiliation:
Dunstaffnage Marine Research Laboratory, Oban, Scotland
D. E. Hoss
Affiliation:
National Marine Fisheries Service, Beaufort, N. Carolina, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Herring (Clupea harengus L.) show a marked ‘startle’ response when subjected to sound stimuli from a vibrating source (Blaxter, Gray & Denton, 1981c). The response, which occurs at a consistent threshold, is elicited by the first cycle of a tone burst or noise, the threshold to one cycle being the same as for a burst of many cycles. Furthermore, if the onset of the tone burst is ‘ramped’ so that it takes several cycles for the full amplitude to be reached, the threshold is markedly raised. Under some conditions the fish move away from the source, showing that they can determine its direction even though the stimulus is confined to a single cycle. The relative roles of sound pressure and particle velocity in providing information about the amplitude and direction of the noise have not been firmly established. Present evidence suggests that pressure is important in triggering the response and probably in measuring the strength of the stimulus. A vector such as particle velocity provides the directional information used in the response. The response can be very fast with a latency of about 25 msec and a contraction time of about 20 msec (Blaxter, Denton & Gray, 1981 b). In these very fast reactions the Mauthner cells probably constitute the motor pathway (Diamond, 1971).

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 61 , Issue 4 , November 1981 , pp. 871 - 879
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, J. M., Blaxter, J. H. S. & Denton, E. J., 1976. The functional anatomy and development of the swimbladder-inner ear-lateral line system in herring and sprat. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 56, 471–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, J. H. S., Denton, E. J. & Gray, J. A. B., 1981a. The auditory bullae-swimbladder system in late stage herring larvae. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 61, 315–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, J. H. S., Denton, E. J. & Gray, J. A. B., 1981b. Acoustico-lateralis system in clupeid fishes. In Hearing and Sound Communication in Fishes (ed. Fay, R. R., Popper, A. N. and Tavolga, W. N.), pp. 39–60. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, J. H. S., Gray, J. A. B. & Denton, E. J., 1981c. Sound and startle responses in herring shoals. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 61, 851–869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, J. H. S. & Hoss, D. E., 1979. The effect of rapid changes of hydrostatic pressure on the Atlantic herring Clupea harengus L. II. The response of the auditory bulla system in larvae and juveniles. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 41, 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denton, E. J. & Blaxter, J. H. S., 1976. The mechanical relationships between the clupeid swimbladder, inner ear and lateral line. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 56, 787–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denton, E. J., Gray, J. A. B. & Blaxter, J. H. S., 1979. The mechanics of the clupeid acousticolateralis system: frequency responses. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 59, 27–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, J., 1971. The Mauthner cell. In Fish Physiology, vol. 5 (ed. Hoar, W. S. and Randall, D. J.), pp. 265–346. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Russell, I. J., 1976. Amphibian lateral line receptors. In Frog Neurobiology (ed. R., Llinas and W., Precht), pp. 513–550, Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wersäll, J. & Flock, Å., 1964. Suppression and restoration of the microphonic output from the lateral line organ after local application of streptomycin. In Life Sciences, vol. 3, pp. 1151–1155. Pergamon.Google Scholar