Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-ckgrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-01T17:11:00.040Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Studies in the Fine Structure and Taxonomy of Flagellates in the Genus Pavlova I. A Revision of Pavlova Gyrans, The Type Species

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

J. C. Green
Affiliation:
(The Plymouth Laboratory)
I. Manton
Affiliation:
(Formerly of the Botany Department, University of Leeds)

Extract

When first described, as the type species of a new genus (Butcher, 1952), Pavlova gyrans was thought to be separable from Ochromonas by only one major character, namely the lateral instead of the supposedly terminal insertion of the strongly anisokont flagella. It was therefore natural to include it in the class Chrysophyceae and to interpret other structural features in accordance with this view. This practice has been continued to some extent subsequently and the three named species which are now recorded in the literature are all in varying degrees in need of emended descriptions. For this particular genus is deceptive. Not only are there unusual fixation difficulties, as already noted by Butcher, but even when examined alive its appearance can suggest the presence of characters which are not in fact what they seem to be and mask others which are essential for taxonomic guidance. Even when all these difficulties have been overcome, certain details are so unusual as to be without known parallel among the ‘brown’ flagellates which have so far been studied with the electron microscope.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Belcher, J. H. & Swale, E. M. F., 1967. Observations on Pteromonas tenuis sp.nov. and P. angulosa (Carter) Lemmermann (Chlorophyceae, Volvocales) by light and electron microscopy. Nova Hedwigia, Vol. 13, pp. 353–9.Google Scholar
Bouck, G. B., 1969. Extracellular microtubules. The origin, structure and attachment of flagellar hairs in Fucus and Ascophyllum antherozoids. J. Cell Biol., Vol. 40, pp. 446–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, R. M., Franke, W. W.Kleinig, H., Falk, H. & Sitte, P., 1969. Cellulosic wall component produced by the Golgi apparatus of Pleurochrysis scherffelii. Science, N.Y., Vol. 166, pp. 894–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butcher, R. W., 1952. Contributions to our knowledge of the smaller marine algae. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 31, pp. 175–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, T., 1962. Alger. In Botanik, Bd. 2, Eds., Böcher, T. W., Lange, M. and Sørenson, T. (Systematisk Botanik), No. 2, pp. 1180, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Green, J. C. & Jennings, D. H., 1967. A physical and chemical investigation of the scales produced by the Golgi apparatus within and found on the surface of the cells of Chrysochromulina chiton Parke et Manton. J. exp. Bot., Vol. 18, pp. 359–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leadbeater, B. S. C., 1971. Observations by means of cine-photography on the behaviour of the haptonema in plankton flagellates of the class Haptophyceae. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 51 (in press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leedale, G. F., Leadbeater, B. S. C. & Massalski, A., 1970. The intracellular origin of flagellar hairs in the Chrysophyceae and Xanthophyceae. J. Cell Sci., Vol. 6, pp. 701–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manton, I., 1965. Some phyletic implications of flagellar structure in plants. Adv. bot. Res., Vol. 2, pp. 134.Google Scholar
Manton, I., 1966. Observations on scale production in Prymnesium parvum. J. Cell Sci., Vol. 1, pp. 375–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manton, I., 1967 a. Further observations on the fine structure of Chrysochromulina chiton with special reference to the haptonema, ‘peculiar’ Golgi structure and scale production. J. Cell Sci., Vol. 2, pp. 265–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manton, I., 1967b. Further observations on scale formation in Chrysochromulina chiton. J. Cell Sci., Vol. 2, pp. 411–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manton, I., 1968. Further observations on the microanatomy of the haptonema in Chrysochromulina chiton and Prymnesium parvum. Protoplasma, Vol. 66, pp. 3553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manton, I. & Harris, K., 1966. Observations on the microanatomy of the brown flagellate Sphaleromantis tetragona Skuja with special reference to the flagellar apparatus and scales. J. Linn. Soc. (Bot.), Vol. 59, pp. 380, 397–403.Google Scholar
Manton, I. & Leedale, G. F., 1963. Observations on the Micro-anatomy of Crystallolithus hyalinus Gaarder and Morkali. Arch. Mikrobiol., Vol. 47, pp. 115–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manton, I. & Peterfi, L. S., 1969. Observations on the fine structure of coccoliths, scales and the protoplast of the freshwater coccolithophorid Hymenomonas roseola Stein, with supplementary observations on the protoplast of Cricosphaera carterae. Proc. Roy. Soc, Lond. Ser. B., Vol. 172, pp. 115.Google Scholar
Parke, M., Manton, I. & Clarke, B., 1955. Studies on marine flagellates. II. Three new species of Chrysochromulina. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 34, pp. 579609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parke, M., Manton, I. & Clarke, B., 1956. Studies on marine flagellates. III. Three further species of Chrysochromulina. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 35, 387414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stosch, H. A. Von, 1955. Ein morphologischer Phasenwechsel bei einer Coccolithophoride. Naturwissenschaften, Vol. 42, p. 423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stosch, H. A. Von, 1958. Der Geisselapparat einer Coccolithophoride. Naturwissenschaften, Vol. 45, pp. 140–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veer, J. Van Der, 1969. Pavlova mesolychnon (Chrysophyta), a new species from the Tamar Estuary, Cornwall. Acta bot. neerl., Vol. 18, pp. 496510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, K. A., Lumsden, W. H. R. & Hales, H., 1970. The formation of filopodium-like processes by Trypanosoma (Trypanozoon) brucei. J. Cell Sci., Vol. 6, pp. 285–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed