Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-m9pkr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-09T08:34:39.948Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Supply of Iron to Diatoms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

H. W. Harvey
H. W. Harvey
Affiliation:
Hydrographer at the Plymouth Laboratory
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The nature of iron occurring in sea water, and its utilization by diatoms, is discussed.

Diatoms in the sea obtain many thousand times more iron than calculation shows they can obtain by diffusion of iron ions from the surrounding water.

Evidence is presented that ferric hydroxide is readily adsorbed on the surface of diatoms.

It is shown that colloidal and larger particles of ferric hydroxide or phosphate can be utilized by, and support the growth of diatoms.

Experiments show that the diatoms Nitzschia closterium and Lauderia borealis require, for continued growth, a very small quantity of iron compared with that found on, and in, diatoms taken from the open sea.

It is contended that iron hydroxide adsorbed on diatoms is in contact with an interface where its solution, and subsequent passage into the cell, is probable.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 22 , Issue 1 , November 1937 , pp. 205 - 219
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1937

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, E. J. & Nelson, E. W., 1910. Artificial culture of marine plankton organisms. Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci., Vol. 60, p. 361.Google Scholar
Braarud, T. & Klem, A., 1931. Hydrographical and chemical investigations in the sea off Möre. Skr. uttgift av Hvalrådets ved Univ. Biol. Lab. Oslo, No. I.Google Scholar
Brandt, K. & Raben, E., 1920. Zur Kenntnis der chemischen Zusammensetzung des Planktons. Wiss. Meeresuntersuch., Abt. Kiel, N.F., Bd. 19, pp. 175–210.Google Scholar
Cole, K.S., 1928. Electric impedance of suspensions of Arbacia eggs. Journ. Gen. PhysioL., Vol. 12, p. 37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooper, L. H. N., 1935. Iron in the sea and in marine plankton. Proc. Roy. Soc. B, Vol. 118, p. 419.Google Scholar
Cooper, L. H. N., 1937. Proc. Roy. Soc, B (in press)Google Scholar
Danielli, J. F., 1937. Surface pH, ion concentration and interfacial tension. Proc. Roy. Soc., B, Vol. 122, p. 155.Google Scholar
East, E. M. & White, B., 1933. Reactions of Valonia to colloids. Journ. Gen. PhysioL Vol. 16, p. 925.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gran, H. H., 1931. On the conditions for the production of plankton in the sea. Rapp. Proc. Verb. Cons. Int. Explor. Mer, Vol. 75, p. 37.Google Scholar
Harvey, , Cooper, , Lebour, & Russell, , 1935. Plankton production and its control. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XX, p. 407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolthoff, I. M., 1937. Ageing of fresh precipitates. Proc. Kon. Akad. van Wet. te Amsterdam, Vol. 40, p. 82.Google Scholar
Marklund, 1936. Acta Bot. Fennica, Vol. 18, p. 1.Quoted byGoogle Scholar
Collander, R., 1937. Permeability. Ann. Rev. Biochemistry, Vol. 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schütt, F., 1889. Centrifugales dickenwachstum der Membranen und extramembranoses Plasma. Jahr. Wiss. Bot., Vol. 33, p. 1.Google Scholar
Seiwell, G. 1935. Note on iron analyses of coastal Atlantic waters. Ecology, Vol. 16, p. 663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, T. G. & Bremner, R., 1935. The occurrence of iron in the water of the N.E. Pacific Ocean. Journ. Cons. Int. Expl. Mer, Vol. X, p. 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wailes, G., 1929. Plant life in the open sea. Museum and Art Notes, Vancouver Vol. 4, p. 83.Google Scholar