Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wpx84 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-09T19:18:34.851Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of Selected Cropping Systems on Pennsylvania Dairy Farms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2017

W. F. Lazarus ,
L. D. Hoffman  and
E. J. Partenheimer
W. F. Lazarus
Affiliation:
The Pennsylvania State University University of Illinois
L. D. Hoffman
Affiliation:
The Pennsylvania State University
E. J. Partenheimer
Affiliation:
The Pennsylvania State University
Get access

Extract

Farmers in the Northeast have traditionally rotated crops in a particular field. This system has several advantages. Rotation of crops reduces the buildup of weeds, insects, and diseases specific to one crop. Legumes such as alfalfa fix nitrogen for use by the following grain crops. Including close growing crops in the rotation reduces soil loss. Growing several crops distributes labor requirements and reduces risk.

Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Journal of the Northeastern Agricultural Economics Council , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , October 1979 , pp. 43 - 57
Copyright
Copyright © Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Journal Paper No. 5696 in the Pennsylvania Agricultural Experiment Station.

References

Adams, W. E., Morris, H. D., and Dawson, R. N. “Effect of Cropping Systems and Nitrogen Levels on Corn Yields in the Southern Piedmont Region.” Agronomy Journal, 62 (1970): 655–59.Google Scholar
Agronomy Guide, 1977–1978. Agricultural Extension Service, The Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar
Kizer, L. G. and Partenheimer, E. J., Optimum Systems for Large Pennsylvania Dairy Farms, Bulletin 791, Agricultural Experiment Station, The Pennsylvania State University, 1974.Google Scholar
Lazarus, W. F. An Economic Analysis of Selected Cropping Systems for Pennsylvania Cash Crop and Dairy Farms. Unpublished M.S. Thesis, The Pennsylvania State University, 1978.Google Scholar
Schrader, W. D., Fuller, W. A. and Cady, F. B. “Estimation of a Common Nitrogen Response Function for Corn in Different Crop Rotations.” Agronomy Journal, 58 (1966): 397–401.Google Scholar
Triplett, G. B. Jr., Haghiri, F., and Van Doren, D. M. Jr. “Corn Yield Following Meadow as Influenced by Nitrogen Under Conventional and No-till Systems.” Agronomy Abstracts, 69 (1977): 167.Google Scholar
Van Doren, D. M. Jr., Triplet, G. B. Jr., and Henry, J. E. “Long-Term Influence of Tillage, Rotation, Soil on Corn Yield.” Ohio Report on Research and Development, The Agricultural Research and Development Center, Wooster, Ohio. September-October, 1975.Google Scholar