Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qlrfm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T02:27:04.684Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Conserving Irrigation Energy in the Northeast

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2017

Dallas M. Lea
Dallas M. Lea*
Affiliation:
Natural Resource Economics Division, Economic Research Service
Get access

Extract

While there has been some irrigated agriculture in each of the 11 States in the Northeast farm production region for a number of years, irrigation has never been widely practiced in this region. The latest available data indicate that only about 2 percent of the cropland in the Northeast is irrigated, while 12 percent of the cropland in the nation is under irrigation, largely in the more arid West. During the past year, ERS has investigated why supplemental irrigation is not practiced by more farmers in the East. The one example of extensive supplemental irrigation in a humid State is Florida, which contains over half of the irrigated acreage in the 26 States east of the Mississippi River although it has the second highest average annual rainfall in the nation. Although discussed in the last section, the main purpose here is not the potential for expanding supplemental irrigation, but to discuss ways of conserving energy with the irrigation already practiced in the Northeast.

Type
Energy and Transportation Issues in the Northeast
Information
Journal of the Northeastern Agricultural Economics Council , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , October 1977 , pp. 67 - 74
Copyright
Copyright © Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Batty, J. Clair, Hamad, Safa N., and Keller, Jack. “Energy Inputs to Irrigation,” Journal of the Irrigation and Drainage Division, Vol. 101, No. IR4, March 1975.Google Scholar
2. Hargreaves, George H. and Christiansen, J. E. “Production as a Function of Moisture Availability,” presented at the 1973 Third World Congress of Engineers and Architects, Tel Aviv, Israel.Google Scholar
3. Hogg, Howard C. and Vieth, Gary R. “Method for Evaluating Irrigation Projects,” Journal of the Irrigation and Drainage Division, Vol. 103, No. IR1, March 1977.Google Scholar
4. Irrigation Association, unpublished data, May 1977.Google Scholar
5. Sloggett, Gordon. “Energy and U.S. Agriculture: Irrigation Pumping, 1974,” Economic Research Service, U.S. Dept. of Agr., March 1977.Google Scholar
6. U.S. Dept. of Agr., Economic Research Service, unpublished data prepared for the 1975 National Water Assessment.Google Scholar
7. U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, 1969 Census of Agriculture, Vol. I, Sec. 2, Table 11.Google Scholar
8. U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, 1969 Census of Agriculture, Vol. IV, Table 1.Google Scholar