^{page 14 note 1} 50, śī-kū 60 śaina-kūna, 33, 82 śai-kū, P 3510, 7.4 śrṃ kūṃ, Ch 1.0021 b, b 50 śiṃ-kūnä will represent the Chinese K 1205, 507 ṣǝng-kün<śįäng-kįuən. I use K for Karlgren, B., Analytic Dictionary of Chinese and Sino-Japanese, 1923Google Scholar.

^{page 14 note 2} vījītta corresponds to the vijida of the Kharoṣṭhī document 661 in Kharoṣṭhī Inscriptions, ed. Boyer, , Rapson, , Senart, , Noble, , 1929Google Scholar; Translation in Burṙow, T., A Translation of the Kharoṣṭhī Documents from Chinese Turkestan, 1940Google Scholar. This vījītta, vijida, like the vi-ja-ya of Tibetan sources, seems to be an Indianization of the indigenous viśa' (= *ṷiža), indicated also by the Chinese transliteration K 1312, 784 uei-ṭṣs'ï < wḙi-d''i. In Or 8212 (162) 21 he is called śrrī vījatta sagrrauma rai.

^{page 14 note 3} Beat's translation I xxxii, H. Giles' Translation, p. 13.

^{page 14 note 4} Beal's Translation I ciii, Chavannes, , BEFEO 3 (1903) 420Google Scholar.

^{page 14 note 5} Beal's Translation I 99, in the Life of Hüan-tsang 63; Julien I 107.

^{page 15 note 1} Chavannes, loc. laud. 423.

^{page 15 note 2} Taḥqīq mā li 'l-hind, ed. Sachau, , Alieruni's Indiap. 207, 1. 13Google Scholar.

^{page 15 note 3} Kharoshṭhi Inscriptions, ed. Konow, (1929), p. 137Google Scholar.

^{page 15 note 4} See Smith, Vincent, Early History of India, 4th ed., p. 277, for bibliographyGoogle Scholar.

^{page 16 note 1} Ed. Konow, p. 145, 137.

^{page 16 note 2} Journal Asiatique, 1936, where bibliographical references are given.

^{page 16 note 3} Indian Antiquary 32 (1903) 345–360.

^{page 17 note 1} No lacuna in the MS.

^{page 17 note 2} Bang, and von Gabain, , Türkische Turfan-Texte IV (1930), p. 4Google Scholar.

^{page 17 note 3} Taishö issaikyö, vol. 50, no. 1058, p. 315, column 2, translated by Lévi, Sylvain, Journal Asiatique, 1896, 446–7Google Scholar.

^{page 20 note 1} For jsa?

^{page 26 note 1} Sic, read püja.

^{page 28 note 1} sūra ought to stand for pūra in E 17.55 ūtca samudru ekaraysa pūra.