Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T17:09:50.441Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Net Premium Method of Valuation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 August 2014

P. M. Carroll
Get access

Extract

1.1. The net premium method of valuation has been controversial ever since it was first advocated over a century and a quarter ago. Its merits and deficiencies have exercised the minds of actuaries whose names are legendary in actuarial science—men such as Finlaison, Jellicoe, Sprague, Manly, Bailey, Coutts, Elderton and Redington; it has been tested in practice against almost every kind of experience; and its demise has repeatedly been predicted. Nevertheless, although it has been modified somewhat over time, in principle it remains today firmly entrenched in life office practice. Consideration of it, even in modern times, has divided actuaries in old ways—the artist from the scientist, the theoretician from the practical man.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Staple Inn Actuarial Society , Volume 21 , Issue 2 , October 1975 , pp. 121 - 138
Copyright
Copyright © Institute of Actuaries Students' Society 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1) Ryan, G. H. (1903). ‘Methods of Valuation and Distribution of Profits in the United Kingdom’. J.I.A., 38, 73–4.Google Scholar
(2) Cox, P. R. and Storr-Best, R. H. (1962). Surplus in British Life Assurance, p. 35, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(3) Jellicoe, C. (1851). ‘On the Determination and Division of Surplus, and on the Modes of Returning it to the Contributors’. J.I.A., 1, 22*, 159.Google Scholar
(4) Sprague, T. B. (1857). ‘On Certain Methods of Dividing the Surplus Among the Assured in a Life Assurance Company; and on the Rates of Premium that Should be Charged to Render Them Equitable’. J.I.A., 7, 61–3.Google Scholar
(5) Tucker, R. (1862). ‘On the Proper Mode of Estimating the Liabilities of Life Insurance Companies’. J.I.A., 10, 312.Google Scholar
(6) Sprague, T. B. (1863). ‘On Certain Methods Proposed for the Valuation of the Liabilities of a Life Assurance Company’. J.I.A., 11, 90.Google Scholar
(7) Cox, P. R. and Storr-Best, R. H., op. cit., p. 42.Google Scholar
(8) Sprague, T. B. (1870). ‘On the Proper Method of Estimating the Liability of a Life Insurance Company Under its Policies’. J.I.A., 15, 418–27.Google Scholar
(9) Sprague, T. B. (1879). J.I.A., 22, 54.Google Scholar
(10) Manly, H. W. (1868). ‘A Comparison of the Values of Policies as Found by Means of the Various Tables of Mortality and Different Methods of Valuation in Use Among Actuaries’. J.I.A., 14, 249.Google Scholar
(11) Manly, H. W., op. cit., p. 255.Google Scholar
(12) Manly, H. W., op. cit., p. 254.Google Scholar
(31) Bailey, A. H. (1878). ‘The Pure Premium Method of Valuation’. J.I.A., 21, 119.Google Scholar
(14) Bailey, A. H., op. cit., p. 126.Google Scholar
(15) Lochhead, R. K. (1932). Valuation and Surplus, p. 65, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(16) Lochhead, R. K., op. cit., p. 66.Google Scholar
(17) Lochhead, R. K., op. cit., p. 76.Google Scholar
(18) Sorley, J. (1878). ‘On Expenses and Selection as Affecting the Pure Premium Method of Valuation’. J.I.A., 21, 203.Google Scholar
(19) Redington, F. M. (1952). ‘A Review of the Principles of Life Office Valuations’. J.I.A., 78, 300.Google Scholar
(20) Redington, F. M., op. cit., p. 302.Google Scholar
(21) Redington, F. M., op. cit., p. 302.Google Scholar
(22) Redington, F. M., op. cit., p. 304.Google Scholar
(23) Sprague, T. B. (1870). op. cit., J.I.A., 15, 411.Google Scholar
(24) Warner, S. G. (1902). ‘Some Notes on the Net Premium Method of Valuation, as affected by recent tendencies and developments’. J.I.A., 37, 72.Google Scholar
(25) Redington, F. M., op. cit., p. 307.Google Scholar
(26) Warner, S. G., op. cit., p. 75.Google Scholar
(27) Berry, B. A. (reported comments) (1902). J.I.A., 37, 77.Google Scholar
(28) Manly, H. W. (reported comments) (1902). J.I.A., 37, 79–81.Google Scholar
(29) Levine, A. (reported comments) (1902). J.I.A., 37, 89.Google Scholar
(30) Ryan, G. H. (1903). ‘Methods of Valuation and Distribution of Profits in the United Kingdom’. J.I.A., 38, 93.Google Scholar
(31) Sprague, T. B. (1857). op. cit., J.I.A., 7, 61.Google Scholar
(32) cf. J.I.A., 37, 79–81 (1902).Google Scholar
(33) Coutts, C. R. V. (1908). ‘Bonus Reserve Valuations’. J.I.A., 42, 161.Google Scholar
(34) Allin, S. J. H. W. (reported comments) (1908). J.I.A., 42, 170.Google Scholar
(35) King, G. (reported comments) (1908). J.I.A., 42, 171–2.Google Scholar
(36) Manly, H. W. (reported comments) (1908). J.I.A., 42, 175.Google Scholar
(37) Woods, E. (reported comments) (1908). J.I.A., 42, 176.Google Scholar
(38) cf. Nash, W. O. (reported comments) (1908). J.I.A., 42, 173.Google Scholar
(39) cf. J.I.A., 62, 92 (1931).Google Scholar
(40) Elderton, W. P. (1931). ‘Valuations in Modern Conditions’. J.I.A., 62, 68–9.Google Scholar
(41) Lochhead, R. K. (reported comments) (1931). J.I.A., 62, 79.Google Scholar
(42) Suttie, T. R. (1945). ‘The Treatment of Appreciation or Depreciation in the Assets of a Life Assurance Fund’. J.I.A., 72, 211.Google Scholar