Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T00:45:54.777Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Roller dung beetles of dung piles suggest habitats are alike, but that of guarding pitfall traps suggest habitats are different

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 September 2021

G. Asha ,
K.K. Navya ,
T.P. Rajesh  and
Palatty Allesh Sinu Open the ORCID record for Palatty Allesh Sinu [Opens in a new window]
G. Asha
Affiliation:
Central University of Kerala, Periye671316, Kerala, India
K.K. Navya
Affiliation:
Central University of Kerala, Periye671316, Kerala, India
T.P. Rajesh
Affiliation:
Central University of Kerala, Periye671316, Kerala, India
Palatty Allesh Sinu*
Affiliation:
Central University of Kerala, Periye671316, Kerala, India
*
Author for correspondence: Palatty Allesh Sinu, Email: sinu@cukerala.ac.in
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Roller dung beetles play a pivotal role in the nutrient distribution in soil and secondary dispersal of seeds. Dung beetles are sampled either using a dung-baited pitfall trap or an exposed dung pile on the ground. While the former method is useful for a rapid survey of dung beetles, information on the ecology and behaviour of dung beetles can be lost, which the latter method provides, but underestimates species diversity due to its inefficiency in trapping rollers. Efficiency of a new method for sampling rollers—installing guarding pitfall traps around dung piles—is assessed in three habitats—contiguous tropical rainforests, fragmented forests, and disturbed used home gardens—and two diel periods—day and night. Five guarding pitfall traps were installed at 50 cm radius around dung piles. About 98% of the total rollers were sampled in pitfall traps. The habitats were similar when the roller catches of only dung piles—conventional approach—were analyzed, but were different when the rollers of guarding pitfall traps were considered. The roller abundance was negatively affected by forest fragmentation and land-use change. About 98% of the rollers were collected at daytime. Using guarding pitfall traps around dung piles is highly recommended for dung beetle diversity studies.

Keywords

Diel activitydung beetleland-use changepitfall traproller dung beetlesampling
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Tropical Ecology , Volume 37 , Issue 5 , September 2021 , pp. 209 - 213
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

contributed equally

References

Amell-Caez, Y, Decastro-Arrazola, I and Noriega, JARI (2019) Spatial diversity of dung beetle assemblages (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) in five ecoregions from Sucre, Colombian Caribbean coast. Revista Colombiana de Entomología 45, e7963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrow, GJ (1931) Coleoptera Lamellicornia Part III. (Coprinae). In Stephenson, J (ed.), The Fauna of British India, Including Ceylon and Burma. London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Asha, G, Manoj, K, Megha, PP, Sinu, PA (2021) Spatiotemporal effects on dung beetle activities in island forests-home garden matrix in a tropical village landscape. Scientific Reports. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-96831-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asha, G and Sinu, PA (2020) DNA barcode and phylogenetic analysis of dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) from the Western Ghats biodiversity hotspot, India. International Journal of Tropical Insect Science 41, 1419–1425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartholomew, GA and Heinrich, B (1978) Endothermy in African dung beetles during flight, ball making, and ball rolling. Journal of Experimental Biology 73, 65–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beiroz, WE, Slade, M, Barlow, J, Silveira, JM, Louzada, J and Sayer, E (2017) Dung beetle community dynamics in undisturbed tropical forests: implications for ecological evaluations of land-use change. Insect Conservation and Diversity 10, 94–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carvalho, RL, Andersen, AN, Anjos, DV, Pacheco, R, Chagas, L and Vasconcelos, HL (2020) Understanding what bioindicators are actually indicating: Linking disturbance responses to ecological traits of dung beetles and ants. Ecological Indicators 108, 105764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chao, A, Simon-Freeman, R and Grether, G (2013) Patterns of Niche Partitioning and Alternative Reproductive Strategies in an East African Dung Beetle Assemblage. Journal of Insect Behavior 26, 525–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
da Silva, PG, Lobo, JM and Hernandez, MIM (2018). The role of habitat and daily activity patterns in explaining the diversity of mountain Neotropical dung beetle assemblages. Austral Ecology 44, 300–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, ALV and Scholtz, CH (2020) Dung beetle conservation biogeography in southern Africa: current challenges and potential effects of climatic change. Biodiversity and Conservation 29, 667–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, ALV, Scholtz, CH, Dooley, PW, Bham, N and Kryger, U (2004) Scarabaeine dung beetles as indicators of biodiversity, habitat transformation and pest control chemicals in agro-ecosystems. South African Journal of Science 100, 415–424.Google Scholar
Doube, BM and Giller, PS (1990) A comparison of two types of trap for sampling dung beetle populations (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 80, 259–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Errouissi, F, Haloti, S, Jay-Robert, P, Janati-Idrissi, A and Lumaret, JP (2004) Effects of the Attractiveness for Dung Beetles of Dung Pat Origin and Size Along a Climatic Gradient. Environmental Entomology 33, 45–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escobar, F (2004) Diversity and composition of dung beetle (Scarabaeinae) assemblages in a heterogeneous Andean landscape. Tropical Zoology 17, 123–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feer, F and Pincebourde, S (2005). Diel flight activity and ecological segregation within an assemblage of tropical forest dung and carrion beetles. Journal of Tropical Ecology 21, 21–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finn, JA and Giller, PS (2000) Patch size and colonisation patterns: An experimental analysis using north temperate coprophagous dung beetles. Ecography 23, 315–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giménez Gómez, VC, Lomáscolo, SB, Zurita, GA and Ocampo, F (2017) Dung Beetle Species (Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae: Eucraniini) from the Monte Desert, Argentina. Neotropical Entomology 47, 821–827.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halffter, G and Edmonds, WD (1982) The nesting behavior of dung beetles (Scarabaeinae): an ecological and evolutive approach. Mexico: Institúto de Ecología, Mexico City.Google Scholar
Hanski, I and Cambefort, Y (1991) Dung Beetle Ecology. NJ, USA: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hernandez, MIM (2002) The night and day of dung beetles (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae) in the Serra do Japi, Brazil: elytra colour related to daily activity Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 46, 597–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iannuzzi, L, Salomão, RP, Costa, FC and Liberal, CN (2016) Environmental patterns and daily activity of dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) in the Atlantic Rainforest of Brazil. Entomotropica 31, 196–207.Google Scholar
Jay-Robert, P, Lumaret, J-P and Lebreton, J-D (2008) Spatial and Temporal Variation of Mountain Dung Beetle Assemblages and Their Relationships with Environmental Factors (Aphodiinae: Geotrupinae: Scarabaeinae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 101, 58–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krell, FT (2007) Dung Beetle Sampling Protocols. Denver Museum of Nature and Science Technical Report 6, 2007-6, pp.11.Google Scholar
Krell, FT, Krell-Westerwalbesloh, S, Weiß, SI, Eggleton, P and Linsenmair, KE (2003) Spatial separation of Afrotropical dung beetle guilds: A trade-off between competitive superiority and energetic constraints (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Ecography 26, 210–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krell, FT, Mahiva, VS, Kouakou, C, N’goran, P, Krell-Westerwalbesloh, S, Newman, DH, Weiß, I and Doumbia, M (2007) Human Influence on the Dung Fauna in Afrotropical Grasslands (Insecta: Coleoptera). In Huber, BA, Sinclair, BJ and Lampe, K-H (ed), African Biodiversity: Molecules, Organisms, Ecosystems. Museum Koenig, Bonn, pp. 133–139.Google Scholar
Krell-Westerwalbesloh, S, Krell, FT and Linsenmair, KE (2004) Diel separation of Afrotropical dung beetle guilds - Avoiding competition and neglecting resources (Coleoptera: Scarabaeoidea). Journal of Natural History 38, 2225–2249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lobo, JM, Martín Piera, F and Veiga, CM (1988) Las trampas pitfall con cebo, susposibilidaesen el estudio de lascomunidadescoprofagas. I. caracteristicas determinates. Revue d´Ecologieetde Biologie. du Sol. 25, 77–100.Google Scholar
Nichols, E, Spector, S, Louzada, J, Larsen, T, Amezquita, S and Favila, ME (2008) Ecological functions and ecosystem services provided by Scarabaeinae dung beetles. Biological Conservation 141, 1461–1474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, ST (2007) Deforestation and biodiversity: effects of bushland cultivation on dung beetles in semiarid Tanzania. Biodiversity and Conservation 16, 2753–2769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raine, EH, Mikich, SB, Lewis, OT and Slade, EM (2019) Linking dung beetle-mediated functions to interactions in the Atlantic Forest: Sampling design matters. Biotropica 52, 215–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Development Core Team (2016) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
Rös, M, Escobar, F and Halffter, G (2012) How dung beetles respond to a human-modified variegated landscape in Mexican cloud forest: A study of biodiversity integrating ecological and biogeographical perspectives. Diversity and Distribution 18, 377–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salomão, RP, Alvarado, F, Baena-Díaz, F, Favila, ME, Iannuzz, L, Santos, BA, Vaz-de-Mello, FZ and González-Tokman, D (2019) Urbanization effects on dung beetle assemblages in a tropical city. Ecological Indicators 103, 665–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salomão, RP, Favila, ME and González-Tokman, D (2020) Spatial and temporal changes in the dung beetle diversity of a protected, but fragmented, landscape of the northernmost Neotropical rainforest. Ecological Indicators 111, 105968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholtz, CS, Davis, ALV and Kryger, U (2009) Evolutionary biology and conservation of dung beetles. Sofia: Pensoft Publishers, pp. 567 Google Scholar
Sowig, P (1995) Habitat selection and offspring survival rate in three paracoprid dung beetles: the influence of soil type and soil moisture. Ecography 18, 147–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sowig, P (1996) Brood care in the dung beetle Onthophagus vacca (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae): the effect of soil moisture on time budget, nest structure, and reproductive success. Ecography 19, 254–258.Google Scholar
Tocco, C, Quinn, DEA, Midgley, JM and Villet, MH (2017) Optimising design and effort for environmental surveys using dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). The Canadian Entomologist 149, 214–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodcock, BA (2005) Pitfall trapping in ecological studies. In Leather SR (ed), Insect sampling in forest ecosystems. Oxford, United Kingdom: Blackwell Science, pp. 37–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, OP (2015) Predation on Dung Beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae): A Literature Review. Transactions of the American Entomological Society 141, 111–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar