Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-24T16:02:13.589Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Subtropical drosophilids in Australia can be characterized by adult distribution across vegetation type and by height above forest floor

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 November 2001

RIEKS DEKKER VAN KLINKEN
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology and Entomology, The University of Queensland, Australia 4072
G. H. WALTER
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology and Entomology, The University of Queensland, Australia 4072

Abstract

Understanding the pattern in which adult drosophilids of different species are distributed across and within different vegetation types is necessary for accurate interpretation of their local ecology and diversity. Such studies have been conducted mainly in temperate regions, and there is no basis for extrapolating their conclusions to tropical areas. This study describes the vertical distribution (0-20 m) of drosophilids attracted to banana baits in five different vegetation types in subtropical eastern Australia including open woodland, and rain-forest types. The distribution of most of the 15 common species could be characterized three-dimensionally by vegetation type and height above forest floor. Only one species, Scaptodrosophila lativittata, was common in all vegetation types and it was a canopy species in rain forests and a ground-level species in open woodland. Vertical distribution of some species clearly matched that of their larval hosts, but it did not in others. For example, the fungivore Leucophenga scutellata was mostly trapped well above the forest floor, yet it breeds at ground level, suggesting behavioural mode can influence vertical distributions. We conclude that the vertical dimension, although still poorly understood in relation to drosophilid habitats, needs to be taken into account when conducting and interpreting studies aimed at understanding drosophilid populations and communities in the subtropics.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2001 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)