Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wtssw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T07:28:45.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Leader Effects and Gender Differences in Sequential Restaurant Ordering Environments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 November 2018

Guenter Schamel  and
Francisco Javier Santos-Arteaga
Guenter Schamel*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Economics and Management, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Universitätsplatz 1, Bozen-Bolzano, 39100, Italy
Francisco Javier Santos-Arteaga
Affiliation:
Faculty of Economics and Management, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Universitätsplatz 1, Bozen-Bolzano, 39100, Italy; e-mail: fsantosarteaga@unibz.it.
*
e-mail: guenter.schamel@unibz.it (corresponding author).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We empirically examine the strategic importance of the choices of the first person ordering, that is, the leader, for the decisions made and money spent by other commensals at a restaurant table. Our aim is to study the similarity of orders—in terms of dishes, drinks, and prices—among the table leader and the other commensals. The empirical results reveal that table leaders, both male and female, exert a considerable influence on the choices made by other diners. We analyze the differences arising when males and females act as table leaders. (JEL Classifications: D12, D91)

Keywords

gender differencesleader effectrestaurant diningsequential orderingstrategic decision
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Wine Economics , Volume 13 , Issue 4 , November 2018 , pp. 461 - 468
Copyright
Copyright © American Association of Wine Economists 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The authors would like to thank Giuseppina Mascia for her help in collecting the data and making the overall study possible. Moreover, the authors extend their thanks to an anonymous reviewer and the editor for their insightful comments and suggestions.

References

Ariely, D., and Levav, J. (2000). Sequential choice in group settings: Taking the road less traveled and less enjoyed. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(3), 279–290.Google Scholar
Eads, L. (2014). Women care less for quality than men. The Drinks Business. Available from https://www.thedrinksbusiness.com/2014/08/women-care-less-for-quality-wine-than-men/. Accessed September 20, 2018.Google Scholar
Ellison, B. (2014). “I'll have what he's having”: Group ordering behavior in food choice decisions. Food Quality and Preference, 37, 79–86.Google Scholar
Ellison, B., Lusk, J., and Davis, D. (2013). Looking at the label and beyond: The effects of calorie labels, health consciousness, and demographics on caloric intake in restaurants. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 10, article 21. Available at https://ijbnpa.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/1479-5868-10-21.Google Scholar
Hasford, J., Kidwell, B., and Lopez-Kidwell, V. (2018). Happy wife, happy life: Food choices in romantic relationships. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(6), 1238–1256.Google Scholar
Lee, J. C., Kim, J., and Kwak, K. (2018). A multi-attribute examination of consumer conformity in group-level ordering. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ), 26(1), 41–48.Google Scholar
Mead, N. L., Baumeister, R. F., Stillman, T. F., Rawn, C. D., and Vohs, K. D. (2011). Social exclusion causes people to spend and consume strategically in the service of affiliation. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(5), 902–919.Google Scholar
Quester, P., and Steyer, A. (2009). Revisiting individual choices in group settings: The long and winding (less traveled) road? Journal of Consumer Research, 36(6), 1050–1057.Google Scholar
Raghunathan, R., and Corfman, K. (2006). Is happiness shared doubled and sadness shared halved? Social influence on enjoyment of hedonic experiences. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(3), 386–394.Google Scholar
Stöckli, S., Dorn, M., and Liechti, S. (2018). Normative prompts reduce consumer food waste in restaurants. Waste Management, 77, 532–536.Google Scholar
Woolley, K., and Fishbach, A. (2017). A recipe for friendship: Similar food consumption promotes trust and cooperation. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27(1), 1–10.Google Scholar