Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-vt8vv Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-08-25T08:11:53.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Trade-offs between offspring size and number in the lizard Lacerta vivipara: a comparison between field and laboratory conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2005

Tobias Uller
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Göteborg University, Medicinaregatan 18, 405 30 Göteborg, Sweden Department of Biological Sciences, University of Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
Mats Olsson
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
Get access

Abstract

Limited resources will inevitably lead to trade-offs between traits. However, trade-offs are not always observed, for a variety of reasons. For example, failure to take into account covariates, and high variation in resource acquisition relative to variation in resource allocation, can obscure the underlying trade-off. In the present paper, the trade-off between offspring size and number was examined in the common lizard Lacerta vivipara. Size–number trade-offs can arise for two different reasons, limited food resources or space constraints. There was no significant trade-off between size and number of young under natural conditions, whereas females captured before ovulation and provided with excess food under laboratory conditions showed a negative correlation between clutch size and offspring size. Food supplementation did not significantly increase reproductive output compared to natural conditions and, thus, the presence of a trade-off under ad libitum conditions was not the result of space limitation in the female reproductive tract. The variance ratio between allocation to investment, however, was twice as high for females ovulating in the laboratory, suggesting that the existence of a trade-off under ad libitum conditions could be a result of less variation among females in resource allocation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2005 The Zoological Society of London

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)