Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-2h6rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-18T15:23:26.016Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Kant’s Mathematical Sublime: The Absolutely Great in Aesthetic Estimation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 August 2020

Weijia Wang
Weijia Wang*
Affiliation:
Fudan University
*
Email: wangweijia@fudan.edu.cn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

According to Kant’s Critique of the Power of Judgement, in the end all estimation of magnitude is sensible, or ‘aesthetic’, and the absolutely great in aesthetic estimation is called ‘the mathematical sublime’. This article identifies the relevant sensible element with an inner sensation of a temporal tension: in aesthetic comprehension, the imagination encounters an inevitable tension between the successive reproduction of a magnitude’s individual parts and the simultaneous unification of these parts. The sensation of this tension varies in degree and facilitates aesthetic estimation in general. But in the special case where it comes to involve a sense of exceeding our imagination’s limit, we judge a magnitude to be mathematically sublime. Pace Kant, I argue that this limit is private and contingent rather than transcendental, such that the judgement of the mathematical sublime is neither universal a priori nor necessary.

Keywords

Kantmathematical sublimeaesthetic estimationimaginationinfinitenegative pleasure
Type
Articles
Information
Kantian Review , Volume 25 , Issue 3 , September 2020 , pp. 465 - 485
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Kantian Review

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allison, Henry E. (2001) Kant’s Theory of Taste: A Reading of the Critique of Aesthetic Judgment. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry E. (2015) Kant’s Transcendental Deduction: An Analytical-Historical Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartuschat, Wolfgang (1972) Zum systematischen Ort von Kants Kritik der Urteilskraft. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.Google Scholar
Budd, Malcolm (2003) ‘The Sublime in Nature’. In Guyer, Paul (ed.), Kant’s Critique of the Power of Judgment: Critical Essays (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield), 121–41.Google Scholar
Cassirer, H. W. (1938) A Commentary on Kant’s Critique of Judgment. New York: Barnes & Noble; London: Methuen & Co.Google Scholar
Clewis, Robert R. (2009) The Kantian Sublime and the Revelation of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowther, Paul. (1989) The Kantian Sublime: From Morality to Art. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
De Man, Paul (1984) ‘Phenomenality and Materiality in Kant’. In Shapiro, Gary and Sica, Alan (eds), Hermeneutics: Questions and Prospects (Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press), 121–44.Google Scholar
Goodreau, John R. (1998) The Role of the Sublime in Kant’s Moral Metaphysics. Washington, DC: Council for Research in Values and Philosophy.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (1996) Kant and the Experience of Freedom. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1900-) Kants gesammelte Schriften. Ed. Royal Prussian, later German Academy of Sciences. Berlin: Georg Reimer, later Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1987) Critique of Judgment. Trans. Werner S. Pluhar. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1998) Critique of Pure Reason. Trans. Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2000) Critique of the Power of Judgment. Ed. Guyer, Paul, trans. Paul Guyer and Eric Matthews. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longuenesse, Béatrice (1998) Kant and the Capacity to Judge: Sensibility and Discursivity in the Transcendental Analytic of the Critique of Pure Reason. Trans. Charles T. Wolfe. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makkreel, Rudolf A. (1994) Imagination and Interpretation in Kant: The Hermeneutical Import of the Critique of Judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Matherne, Samantha (Forthcoming) ‘Imagining Freedom: Kant on Symbols of Sublimity’. In Heide, Dai and Tiffany, Evan (eds), Kantian Freedom (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Matthews, Patricia M. (1996) ‘Kant’s Sublime: A Form of Pure Aesthetic Reflective Judgment’. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 54(2), 165–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myskja, Bjørn K. (2002) The Sublime in Kant and Beckett: Aesthetic Judgement, Ethics and Literature. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, Kap Hyun (2009) Kant über das Erhabene: Rekonstruktion und Weiterführung der kritischen Theorie des erhabenen Kants. Würzburg: Königshausen u. Neumann.Google Scholar
Pillow, Kirk (2000) Sublime Understanding: Aesthetic Reflection in Kant and Hegel. New Baskerville, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Recki, Birgit (2001) Ästhetik der Sitten: Die Affinität von ästhetischem Gefühl und praktischer Vernunft bei Kant. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.Google Scholar
Schaper, Eva (1992) ‘Taste, Sublimity, and Genius: The Aesthetics of Nature and Art’. In Guyer, Paul (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Kant (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 367–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Simon (2015) ‘Kant’s Mathematical Sublime and the Role of the Infinite: Reply to Crowther’. Kantian Review, 20(1), 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uehling, Theodore E. Jr. (1971) The Notion of Form in Kant’s Critique of Aesthetic Judgment. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Weijia (2018) ‘Three Necessities in Kant’s Theory of Taste: Necessary Universality, Necessary Judgement, and Necessary Free Harmony’. International Philosophical Quarterly, 58(3), 255–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar