Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T11:12:41.718Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Replies to Critics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 August 2018

Nicholas F. Stang*
Affiliation:
University of Toronto

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Author Meets Critics
Copyright
© Kantian Review 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adickes, E. (1924) Kant und das Ding an sich. Berlin: Pan Verlag Rolf Heisse (repr. Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1977).Google Scholar
Baumgarten, A. G. (1757) Metaphysica (4th edition). Halle: Carl Hermann Hemmerd.Google Scholar
Descartes, R. (1984–91) The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, vols 1–3 Trans. and ed. J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff and D. Murdoch. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Langton, R. (1998) Kantian Humility: Our Ignore of Things in Themselves. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Langton, R., and Lewis, D. (1998) ‘Defining “intrinsic”’. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 58 (2), 333345.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W. (1989) Philosophical Essays. Trans. R. Ariew and D. Garber. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
McDaniel, K. (2017) The Fragmentation of Being. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stang, N. (2011) ‘Did Kant Conflate the Necessary and the A Priori?’. Noûs, 45 (3), 443471.Google Scholar
Stang, N. (2016) Kant’s Modal Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Van Cleve, J. (1999) Problems from Kant. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wolff, C. (1965–) Gesammelte Werke. Ed. J. École, H. W. Arndt, C. A. Corr, J. E. Hoffmann and M. Thomann. Hildesheim: Georg Olms.Google Scholar