Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T11:44:06.969Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Kant and the Problem of Demandingness: Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 August 2018

Marcel van Ackeren  and
Martin Sticker
Marcel van Ackeren*
Affiliation:
Mansfield College, Oxford
Martin Sticker*
Affiliation:
Trinity College Dublin
*
Email: Marcel.vanAckeren@philosophy.ox.ac.uk
Email: stickerm@tcd.ie
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Critical Exchange
Information
Kantian Review , Volume 23 , Issue 3 , September 2018 , pp. 373 - 378
Copyright
© Kantian Review 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackeren, Marcel van and Kühler, Michael (eds) (2016) The Limits of Moral Obligation. Moral Demandingness and Ought Implies Can. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ackeren, Marcel van and Sticker, Martin (2015) ‘Kant and the Problem of Demandingness’. Ethical Theory Moral Practice, 18, 75–89.Google Scholar
Ashford, Elizabeth (2000) ‘Utiliarianism, Integrity and Partiality’. Journal of Philosophy, 97, 421–439.Google Scholar
Ashford, Elizabeth (2003) ‘The Demandingness of Scanlon’s Contractualism’. Ethics, 113, 273–302.Google Scholar
Ashford, Elizabeth and Mulgan, Tim (2012) ‘Contractualism’. In Edward N. Zalta (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2012 edn. URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2012/entries/contractualism/>..>Google Scholar
Benn, Claire (2016) ‘Overdemandingness Objections and Supererogation’. In Marcel van Ackeren and Michael Kühler (eds), The Limits of Moral Obligation. Moral Demandingness and Ought Implies Can. New York: Routledge), pp. 68–83.Google Scholar
Crisp, Roger (1996) ‘The Dualism of Practical Reason’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 96, 53–73.Google Scholar
Finlay, Stephen (2008) ‘Too Much Morality’. In Paul Bloomfield (ed.), Morality and Self-Interest (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 136–154.Google Scholar
Fishkin, James (1982) The Limits of Obligation. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1976) Phenomenology of Spirit. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1991) Elements of the Philosophy of Right. Trans. H. B. Nesbit, ed. Allen Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hooker, Brad (2009) ‘The Demandingness Objection’. In Timothy Chappell (ed.), The Problem of Moral Demandingness (London: Acumen), pp. 148–162.Google Scholar
Igneski, Violetta (2008) ‘Defending Limits on the Sacrifices we Ought to Make for Others’. Utilitas, 20, 424–426.Google Scholar
Kagan, Shelly (1989) The Limits of Morality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1996) Practical Philosophy. Trans. Mary J. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lazari-Radek, Katarzyna de and Singer, Peter (2014) The Point of View of the Universe. Sidgwick and Contemporary Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McElwee, Brian (2016) ‘What is Demandingness?’. In Marcel van Ackeren and Michael Kühler (eds), The Limits of Moral Obligation. Moral Demandingness and Ought Implies Can (New York: Routledge), pp. 19–35.Google Scholar
Mulgan, Tim (2001) The Demands of Consequentialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, Liam (1993) ‘The Demands of Beneficence’. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 22, 267–292.Google Scholar
O’Neill, Onora (1993) ‘Kantian Approaches to Some Famine Problems’. In Tom Reagan (ed.), Matters of Life and Death (New York: McGraw-Hill), pp. 546–551.Google Scholar
O’Neill, Onora (2009) ‘Demandingness and Rules’. In Timothy Chappell (ed.), The Problem of Moral Demandingness (London: Acumen), pp. 59–70.Google Scholar
Pinheiro Walla, Alice (2015) ‘Kant’s Moral Theory and Demandingness’. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 18 (4), 731–743.Google Scholar
Scheffler, Samuel (1992) Human Morality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Singer, Peter (1972) ‘Famine, Affluence, and Morality’. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 1, 229–243.Google Scholar
Stohr, Karen (2011) ‘Kantian Beneficence and the Problem of Obligatory Aid’. Journal of Moral Philosophy, 8 (1), 45–67.Google Scholar
Timmermann, Jens (2005) ‘Good But Not Required? Assessing the Demands of Kantian Ethics’. Journal of Moral Philosophy, 2, 9–27.Google Scholar
Timmermann, Jens (2007) Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: A Commentary . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vogt, Katja (2008) ‘Duties to Others: Demands and Limits’. In Monika Betzler (ed.), Kant’s Ethics of Virtues (Berlin: de Gruyter), pp. 219–245.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard (1985) Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. London: Fontana Press.Google Scholar
Wolf, Susan (1982) ‘Moral Saints’. Journal of Philosophy, 79 (8), 419–439.Google Scholar