Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-jhxnr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T06:03:32.149Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Classification and counter-classification of language on Saint Barthélemy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2012

Jon F. Pressman
Jon F. Pressman
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Bryn Mawr College, Bryn Mawr, PA 19010, jpressma@brynmawr.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article analyzes the use of metapragmatic description in the ethnoclassification of language by native speakers on the Franco-Antillean island of Saint Barthélemy. A prevalent technique for metapragmatic description is facilitated by the differential formation of honorific registers in the island's indigenous languages, so that speakers essentialize honorific pronouns as tropes of whole languages and classify the languages in such terms. This process reflects the varied geolinguistic and generational attributes of these speakers, whose register or social-dialectal calculations are all based ultimately on folk ideologies of honorification. (Classification, language ideology, French Creole, metapragmatics, Caribbean sociolinguistics)

Type
Research Article
Information
Language in Society , Volume 27 , Issue 4 , December 1998 , pp. 459 - 494
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agha, Asif (1993). Grammatical and indexical convention in honorific discourse. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 3:131–63.Google Scholar
Agha, Asif (1994) Honorification Annual Review of Anthropology 23:277–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agha, Asif (1998). Stereotypes and registers of honorific language. Language in Society 27:151–94.Google Scholar
Baker, Philip, & Corne, Chris (1982). Île de France Creole. Ann Arbor: Karoma.Google Scholar
Benoist, Jean (1964). Saint-Barthélemy: Physical anthropology of an isolate. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 22:473–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benoist, Jean, & Lefebvre, Gilles (1972). Organisation sociale, évolution biologique et diversité linguistique à Saint-Barthélemy. In Benoist, Jean (ed.), L'Archipel inachevé: Culture et socété aux Antilles Francçaises, 93–105. Montreal: University of Montreal Press.Google Scholar
Bernabé, Jean (1983). Fondal-Natal: Grammaire basilectale approché des Créoles guadeloupéen et martiniquais. Paris: L'Harmattan.Google Scholar
Bernabé, Jean (1987). Grammaire Créole. Paris: L'Harmattan.Google Scholar
Brown, Roger, & Gilman, Albert (1960). The pronouns of power and solidarity. In Sebeok, Thomas A. (ed.), Style in language, 253–76. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Caton, Steve (1990). Speech styles, status, and speaker awareness. Semiotica 80:153–60.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard (1976). Linguistic politeness axes: Speaker-addressee, speaker-referent, speaker-bystander. Pragmatics Microfiche 1(7):A3-B1.Google Scholar
Deveau, Jean (1972). Le peuplement de Saint-Barthélemy. Bulletin de la Société d'Histoire de la Guadeloupe 17/18:25–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro (1992). Language in context and language as context: The Samoan respect vocabulary. In Duranti, Alessandro & Goodwin, Charles (eds.), Rethinking context: Language as interactive phenomenon, 77–99. Cambridge – New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Errington, J. Joseph (1985a). On the nature of the sociolinguistic sign: Describing the Javanese speech levels. InMertz, Elizabeth & Parmentier, Richard (eds.), Semiotic mediation: Sociocultural and psychological perspectives, 287–310. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Errington, J. Joseph (1985b). Language and social change in Java: Linguistic reflexes of modernization in a traditional royal polity. Athens, OH: Ohio University Center for International Studies.Google Scholar
Errington, J. Joseph (1988). Structure and style in Javanese: A semiotic view of linguistic etiquette. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. (1972). The users and uses of language. In Fishman, Joshua (ed.), Readings in the sociology of language, 139–69. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Hanks, William F. (1993). Metalanguage and pragmatics of deixis. In Lucy, John A. (ed.), Reflexive language: Reported speech and metapragmatics, 127–57. Cambridge – New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Highfield, Arnold (1979). The French dialect of St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands. Ann Arbor: Karoma.Google Scholar
Hill, Jane (1992). “Today there is no respect”: Nostalgia, “respect” and oppositional discourse in Mexicano (Nahuatl) language ideology. Pragmatics 2:263–80.Google Scholar
Hill, Jane, & Hill, Kenneth (1978). Honorific usage in Modern Nahuatl. Language 54:123–55.Google Scholar
Hockett, Charles (1950). Age-grading and linguistic continuity. Language 26:449–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irvine, Judith (1985). Status and style in language. Annual Review of Anthropology 14:557–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irvine, Judith (1992). Ideologies of honorific language. Pragmatics 2:251–62.Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith (1995). Honorifics. In Verschueren, Jef et al. (eds.), Handbook of pragmatics, 1–22. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman (1956). Metalanguage as a linguistic problem. Presidential address, Linguistic Society of America. Published in Rudy, Stephen (ed.), Selected writings, 7:113–21. Berlin: Mouton, 1985.Google Scholar
Joseph, John (1987). Subject relevance and deferential address in the Indo-European languages. Lingua 37:259–77.Google Scholar
Keating, Elizabeth (1995). Spatial conceptualizations of social hierarchy in Pohnpei, Micronesia. In Frank, Andrew & Kuhn, Werner (eds.), Spatial information theory, 463–74. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Keating, Elizabeth (1997). Honorific possession: Power and language in Pohnpei, Micronesia. Language in Society 26:247–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre, Gilles (1976). Français régional et créole à Saint-Barthé1emy (Guadeloupe). In Snyder, Émile & Valdman, Albert (eds.), Identité culturelle et francophonie dans les Amériques, 122–46. Quebec: Laval University Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen (1979). Pragmatics and social deixis: Reclaiming the notion of conventional implicature. Berkeley Linguistics Society 5:206–23.Google Scholar
Maher, Julianne (1988). The Creole of St. Barthélemy: A preliminary sketch. Espace Créole 6:77–99.Google Scholar
Maher, Julianne (1990). Créole et patois à Saint-Barthélemy: Diversité linguistique dans une population homogène. Études Créoles 13(1):45–55.Google Scholar
Maher, Julianne (1996). Fishermen, farmers, traders: Language and economic history on St. Barthélemy, French West Indies. Language in Society 25:373–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Robert E. (1988). Lexicalization versus lexical loss in Wasco-Wishram language obsolescence. International Journal of American Linguistics 54:453–68.Google Scholar
Morford, Janet (1997). Social indexicality in French pronominal address. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 7:3–37.Google Scholar
Pressman, Jon F. (1996). Shifting registers: Language shift and consequences for honorification on St. Barthélemy. Dissertation, University of PennsylvaniaGoogle Scholar
Pressman, Jon F. (1997a). Grammaticalization of honorifics in Antillean French Creole. Chicago Linguistic Society 33:337–50.Google Scholar
Pressman, Jon F. (1997b). Honorification and projection on Saint Barthélemy. Anthropological Linguistics 39:111–50.Google Scholar
Robequain, Charles (1949). Saint-Barthélemy, terre française. Cahiers d'Outre-Mer 2(5):14–37.Google Scholar
Rumsey, Alan (1990). Wording, meaning, and linguistic ideology. American Anthropologist 92:346–61.Google Scholar
Sanguin, André-Louis (1981). Saint-Barthélemy, île normande des Antilles Françaises. Études Normandes 4:57–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi (1994). Honorifics. In Asher, Ronald E. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Languages and Linguistics, 1600–08. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael (1976). Shifters, linguistic categories, and cultural description. In Basso, Keith & Selby, Henry (eds.), Meaning in anthropology, 11–55. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael (1977). Cultural prerequisites to grammatical analysis. In Saville-Troike, Muriel (ed.), Linguistics and anthropology (GURT 1977), 139–51. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael (1979). Language structure and linguistic ideology. In Clyne, Paul R. et al. (eds.), The Elements: A Parasession on Linguistic Units and Levels, 193–247. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael (1981) The limits of awareness. (Working papers in sociolinguistics, 84.) Austin, TX: Southwestern Educational Laboratory.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael (1987). Cognitive implications of a referential hierarchy. In Hickmann, Maya (ed.), Social and functional approaches to language and thought, 125–64. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael (1988). Demeanor indexicals and honorific registers. Paper presented at the Reed/PSU Honorifics Conference, 04 8–10.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael (1992). The uses and utility of ideology: Some reflections. Pragmatics 2:311–23.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael (1994). Relative motivation in denotational and indexical sound symbolism of Wasco-Wishram Chinookan. In Hinton, Leanne et al. (eds.), Sound symbolism, 40–60. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael (1996a). Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. In Ide, Risako et al. (eds.), SALSA III: Proceedings of the Third Annual Symposium about Language and Society—Austin (Texas linguistic forum, 36), 266–95. Austin: Department of Linguistics, University of Texas.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael (1996b). The secret life of texts. In Silverstein, M. & Urban, Greg (eds). Natural histories of discourse, 81–105. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Urban, Greg (1986). Linguistic consciousness and allophonic variation: A semiotic perspective. Semiotica 6:33–59.Google Scholar