Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T03:05:49.021Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Emergent sociolinguistic variation in severe language endangerment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 July 2019

Jonathan R. Kasstan
Jonathan R. Kasstan*
Affiliation:
University of Westminster, UK
*
Address for correspondence: Jonathan R. Kasstan School of HumanitiesUniversity of Westminster309 Regent Street London, W1B 2HW, UKj.kasstan@westminster.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Contrary to Labov's principle of style shifting, studies in language obsolescence portray speakers of dying languages as ‘monostylistic’, a characterization questioned here. Variationist methodology is adopted in a context of gradual language death. By combining quantitative and interactional analyses of data from older, younger, and new speakers of Francoprovençal in France and Switzerland, the article considers (a) to what extent variability in language obsolescence differs from that found in ‘healthy’ languages, and (b) how innovations might spread through communities speaking threatened languages characterized as ‘monostylistic’ and lacking overt normative infrastructure. It is argued that style variation (not monostylism) emerges from linguistic decay: among more fluent speakers, a categorical rule of /l/-palatalization before obstruents becomes underspecified, rendering palatalization available for strategic use. Among new speakers, novel palatal variants form part of an emergent sociolinguistic norm. The study offers fresh insights on the origins of sociolinguistic variation with implications for variationist theory. (Language obsolescence, language death, language variation and change, style variation, new speakers)*

Type
Articles
Information
Language in Society , Volume 48 , Issue 5 , November 2019 , pp. 685 - 720
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

I thank Jenny Cheshire, Silvia Dal Negro, David Hornsby, Naomi Nagy, Devyani Sharma, Itxaso Rodríguez-Ordóñez, and two anonymous reviewers for their feedback on earlier drafts of this article. The research on which the article is based would not have been possible without generous funding from a Leverhulme Trust Early Career Fellowship (ECF-2017-584). I am indebted to the communities from whom the data discussed here have come.

References

REFERENCES

Amano, Tatsuya; Sandel, Brody; Eager, Heidi; Bulteau, Edouard; Svenning, Jens-Christian; Dalsaard, Bo; Rahbek, Carsten D.; Davies, Richard G.; & Sutherland, William J. (2014). Global distribution and drivers of language extinction. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 281(1793). doi: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.1574.Google Scholar
Adkins, Madeleine (2013). Will the real Breton please stand up? International Journal of the Sociology of Language 223:55–70.Google Scholar
Bailey, Charles-James N. (1973). Variation and linguistic theory. Arlington: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Barmaz, Janine, & Pannatier, Gisèle (2013). Cours de patois: En patois d’Évolène. Canton du Valais: Fondation du Patois.Google Scholar
Bell, Allan (1984). Language style as audience design. Language in Society 13(2):145–204.Google Scholar
Blainey, Darcie (2017). Sociolinguistic research with endangered varieties: The case of Louisiana French. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 62(4):576–95.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul, & Weenink, David (2012). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 5.3.17.Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle, & Muntzel, Martha C. (1989). The structural consequences of language death. In Nancy C. Dorian (ed.), Investigating obsolescence, 181–96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cerquiglini, Bernard (1999). Les langues de France: Rapport au Ministre de l’Éducation Nationale, de la Recherche et de la Technologie, et à la Ministre de la Culture et de la Communication, April 1999.Google Scholar
Chirkova, Katia; Stanford, James N.; & Wang, Dehe (2018). A long way from New York City: Socially stratified contact-induced phonological convergence in Ganluo Ersu (Sichuan China). Language Variation and Change 30(1):109–45.Google Scholar
Clarke, Sandra (2009). Sociolinguistic stratification and new dialect formation in a Canadian aboriginal community: Not so different after all? In Stanford, James N. & Preston, Dennis (eds.), Variation in indigenous minority languages, 109–28. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Dal Negro, Silvia (2004). Language contact and dying languages. Revue franççaise de linguistique appliquée 9(2):47–58.Google Scholar
Diémoz, Federica, & Kristol, Andres (2018). Atlas linguistique audiovisuel du francoprovençal Valaisan ALAVAL. Neuchâtel: Université de Neuchâtel. Online: http://alaval.unine.ch; accessed August 7, 2018.Google Scholar
Dorian, Nancy C. (1977). The problem of the semi-speaker in language death. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 12:23–32.Google Scholar
Dorian, Nancy C. (1981). Language death: The life cycle of a Scottish Gaelic dialect. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Dorian, Nancy C. (1989). Introduction. In Nancy C. Dorian (ed.), Investigating obsolescence, 1–10. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dorian, Nancy C. (1994a). Varieties and variation in a very small place: Social homogeneity, prestige norms, and linguistic variation. Language 70(4):631–96.Google Scholar
Dorian, Nancy C. (1994b). Purism vs. compromise in language revitalization and language revival. Language in Society 23(4):479–94.Google Scholar
Dorian, Nancy C. (1994c). Stylistic variation in a language restricted to private-sphere use. In Biber, Douglas & Finegan, Edward (eds.), Sociolinguistic perspectives on register, 217–32. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang (1972). On the phonology of language death. Chicago Linguistic Society Papers 8:448–57.Google Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang (1982). Acceleration, retardation, and reversal in language decay? In Cooper, Robert L. (ed.), Language spread: Studies in diffusion and social change, 321–36. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang (1988). Language death. In Newmeyer, Frederick J. (ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge survey, vol IV. Language: The socio-cultural context, 184–92. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang, & Wodak-Leodolter, Ruth (1977). Language preservation and language death in Brittany. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 12:33–44.Google Scholar
Duraffour, Antonin (1932). Phénomènes généraux d’évolution phonétique dans les dialectes francoprovençaux étudie d'après le parler de la commune de Vaux (Ain). Revue de Linguistique Romane 8:1–280.Google Scholar
Favre, Christophe, & Balet, Zacharie (1960). Lexique du parler de Savièse. Berne: A. Francke.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, Colleen M. (2017). Understanding language vitality and reclamation as resilience: A framework for language endangerment and ‘loss’ (Commentary on Mufwene). Language 93(4):e281–98.Google Scholar
Gal, Susan (1984). Phonological style in bilingualism. In Schiffrin, Deborah (ed.), Meaning, form and use in context: Linguistic applications, 290–302. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Gardette, Pierre (1950–1956). Atlas linguistique et ethnographique du Lyonnais. Paris: Éditions du C.N.R.S.Google Scholar
Gardette, Pierre (1974). Le francoprovençal: Son histoire, ses origines. Actes du 5e Congrès international de langue et littérature d'oc et d’études francoprovençal (Nice, 1967), Publ. De la Faculté des Lettres et des Sciences Humaines, 13, 294–305. Nice: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Gilliéron, Jules (1880). Petit atlas phonétique du Valais Roman (sud du Rhône). Paris: Honoré Champion.Google Scholar
Gilliéron, Jules, & Edmont, Edmond (1902–1910). Atlas linguistique de la France. Paris: Honoré Champion.Google Scholar
Grinevald Craig, Colette (1997). Language contact and language degeneration. In Coulmas, Florian (ed.), The handbook of sociolinguistics, 257–70. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Haddican, Bill (2007). Suburbanization and language change in Basque. Language in Society 36(5):677–706.Google Scholar
Hildebrandt, Kristine A.; Jany;, Carmen & Silva, Wilson (2017). Introduction: Documenting variation in endangered languages. Language Documentation & Conservation 13:1–5.Google Scholar
Hill, Jane, & Hill, Kenneth (1977). Language death and relexification in Tlaxcalan Nahuatl. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 12:55–69.Google Scholar
Holloway, Charles E. (1997). Dialect death: The case of Brule Spanish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell (1984). Sociolinguistics: Stability and consolidation. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 12:33–44.Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith I., & Gal, Susan (2000). Language ideologies and linguistic differentiation. In Kroskrity, Paul V. (ed.), Regimes of language: Ideologies, polities, and identities, 35–84. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
Jaffe, Alexandra (2015). Defining the new speaker: Theoretical perspectives and learner trajectories. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 231:21–44.Google Scholar
Jänicke, Otto (1997). Studien zur Palatalisierung des Nexus Kons. + [l] in der Galloromania. Hamburčg: Kovač.Google Scholar
Jeanjacquet, Jules (1931). Les patois valaisan: Caractères généraux et particularités. Revue de Linguistique Romane 7:22–51.Google Scholar
Jones, Mari C. (1998). Language obsolescence and revitalization: Linguistic change in two sociolinguistically contrasting Welsh communities. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Kasstan, Jonathan R. (2015a). Variation and change in Francoprovençal: A study of an emerging linguistic norm. Canterbury: University of Kent dissertation.Google Scholar
Kasstan, Jonathan R. (2015b). Illustrations of the IPA: Lyonnais (Francoprovençal). Journal of the International Phonetic Association 45(3):340–55.Google Scholar
Kasstan, Jonathan R. (2017). New speakers: Challenges and opportunities for variationist sociolinguistics. Language and Linguistics Compass 11(8):e12249.Google Scholar
Kasstan, Jonathan R. (2018). Exploring contested authenticity among speakers of a contested language: The case of ‘Francoprovençal’. Journal of Multilingual & Multicultural Development 39(5):382–93.Google Scholar
Kasstan, Jonathan R., & Müller, Daniela (2018). (l) as a sociolinguistic variable in Francoprovençal. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 249:99–118.Google Scholar
Kasstan, Jonathan R., Müller, Daniela & Nagy, Naomi (2018). Introduction. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 249:1–9.Google Scholar
Kennard, Holly J., & Lahiri, Aditi (2017). Mutation in Breton verbs: Pertinacity across generations. Journal of Linguistics 53(1):113–45.Google Scholar
Klingler, Thomas A., & LaFleur, Amanda (2007). L'enquête PFC en Louisiane. In Detey, Sylvain & Nouveau, Dominique (eds.), Bulletin PFC N. 7, PFC: Enjeux descriptifs, théoriques et didactiques 2007, 331–40. Toulouse: Université de Toulouse II.Google Scholar
Labov, William (1966). The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Labov, William (1971). Some principles of linguistic methodology. Language in Society 1:97–120.Google Scholar
Labov, William (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William (1984). Field methods of the project on linguistic change and variation. In Baugh, John & Sherzer, Joel (eds.), Language in use: Readings in sociolinguistics, 28–53. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Labov, William (2001). Principles of linguistic change, vol 2: Social factors. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labov, William (2016). Afterword: Where are we now? Journal of Sociolinguistics 20(4):581–602.Google Scholar
Lai, Li-Fang, & Gooden, Shelome (2018). The spread of raised (ay) and (aw) in Yami: From regional distinctiveness to ethnic identity marker. Journal of Linguistic Geography 6(2):125–44.Google Scholar
Loh, Jonathan, & Harmon, David (2014). Biocultural diversity: Threatened species, endangered languages. Zeist: WWF Netherlands.Google Scholar
Matthey, Marinette, & Meune, Manuel (2012). Anthologie des textes romands en francoprovençal. Revue transatlantique d’études suisses 2:107–12.Google Scholar
Meyerhoff, Miriam (2016). Methods, innovations and extensions: Reflections on half a century of methodology in social dialectology. Journal of Sociolinguistics 20(4):431–52.Google Scholar
Milroy, Lesley (1980). Language and social networks. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mougeon, Raymond, & Beniak, Edouard (1989). Language contraction and linguistic change: The case of Welland French. In Dorian, Nancy C. (ed.), Investigating obsolescence, 287–312. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nagy, Naomi (2011). Lexical change and language contact: Faetar in Italy and Canada. Journal of Sociolinguistics 15(3):366–82.Google Scholar
Nance, Claire (2018). Linguistic innovation among Glasgow Gaelic new speakers. In Smith-Christmas, Cassie, Murchadha, Noel P. Ó, Hornsby, Michael, & Moriarty, Máiréad (eds.), New speakers of minority languages: Linguistic ideologies & practices, 213–30. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Nance, Claire Wilson McLeod; Wilson, Bernadette; & Dunmore, Stuart (2016). Identity, accent aim, and motivation in second language users: New Scottish Gaelic speakers’ use of phonetic variation. Journal of Sociolinguistics 20(2):164–91.Google Scholar
O'Rourke, Bernadette; Pujolar, Joan; & Ramallo, Fernando (2015). New speakers of minority languages: The challenging opportunity – Foreword. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 231:1–20.Google Scholar
Pooley, Tim (2000). Sociolinguistics, regional varieties of French and regional languages in France. Journal of French Language Studies 10(2):117–57.Google Scholar
Rampton, Ben (1990). Displacing the ‘native speaker’: Expertise, affiliation, and inheritance. ELT Journal 44(2):97–101.Google Scholar
Rau, D. Victoria; Chang, Hui-Huan Ann; & Dong, Maa-Neu (2009). A tale of two diphthongs in an indigenous minority language. In Stanford, James N. & Preston, Dennis (eds.), Variation in indigenous minority languages, 259–79. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Romaine, Suzanne (1989). Pidgins, creoles, immigrant, and dying languages. In Nancy C. Dorian (ed.), Investigating obsolescence, 369–84. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schilling-Estes, Natalie (1998). Investigating ‘self-conscious’ speech: The performance register in Ocracoke English. Language in Society 27:53–83.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Annette (1985). Young people's Dyirbal: An example of language death from Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Skilton, Amalia Horan (2017). Three speakers, four dialects: Documenting variation in an endangered Amazonian language. Language Documentation & Conservation 13:94–115.Google Scholar
Stanford, James N. (2016). A call for more diverse sources of data: Variationist approaches in non-English contexts. Journal of Sociolinguistics 20(4):525–41.Google Scholar
Stanford, James N., & Preston, Dennis (2009). The lure of a distant horizon: Variation in indigenous minority languages. In Stanford, James N. & Preston, Dennis (eds.), Variation in indigenous minority languages, 1–22. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Stich, Dominique (1998). Le Francoprovençal: Langue méconnue. Paris: L'Harmattan.Google Scholar
Stich, Dominique Xavier Gouvert; Favre, Alain; & Walter, Henriette (2003). Dictionnaire des mots de base du francoprovençal: Orthographe ORB supradialectal standardisée. Thonon-Les-Bains: Éditions Le Carré.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter (1999). New-dialect formation and dedialectalisation: Embryonic and vestigial variants. Journal of English Linguistics 27(4):319–27.Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel (1968). Language contact: Findings and problems. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt (2002). Language death and dying. In Chambers, Jack K., Trudgill, Peter, & Schilling-Estes, Natalie (eds.), The handbook of language variation and change, 764–87. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Woolard, Kathryn A. (2008). Language and identity choice in Catalonia: The interplay of contrasting ideologies of linguistic authority. In Süselbeck, Kirsten, Mühlschlegel, Ulrike, & Masson, Peter (eds.), Lengua, nación e identidad: La regulación del plurilingüismo en España y América Latina, 764–87. Vervuert: Iberoamericana.Google Scholar
Woolhiser, Curt (2007). Communities of practice and linguistic divergence: Belarusophone students as agents of linguistic change. Harvard Ukrainian Studies 29(1–4):1–34.Google Scholar
Zulato, Alessia; Kasstan, Jonathan R.; & Nagy, Naomi (2018). An overview of Francoprovençal vitality in Europe and North America. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 249:11–29.Google Scholar