Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-qks25 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-08T18:18:38.991Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Investigating “self-conscious” speech: The performance register in Ocracoke English

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2012

Natalie Schilling-Estes
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-2150, estesl@leland.stanford.edu

Abstract

This article examines PERFORMANCE SPEECH in the historically isolated island community of Ocracoke, North Carolina. Over the past several decades islanders have come into increasingly frequent contact with tourists and new residents, who often comment on the island's “quaint” relic dialect. In response, some Ocracokers have developed performance phrases that highlight island features, particularly the pronunciation of/ay/ with a raised/backed nucleus, i.e. [Λ-1]. The analysis of/ay/ in the performance and non-performance speech of a representative Ocracoke speaker yields several important insights for the study of language in its social context. First, performance speech may display more regular patterning than has traditionally been assumed. Second, it lends insight into speaker perception of language features. Finally, the incorporation of performance speech into the variationist-based study of style-shifting offers support for the growing belief that style-shifting may be primarily proactive rather than reactive. (Keywords: Ocracoke, performance speech, style-shifting, stylistic variation, register, self-conscious speech.)

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arnold, Jennifer et al. , (1993). Variation and personal/group style. Paper presented at New Ways of Analyzing Variation 22, Ottawa.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail (1981). The dialogic imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Baugh, John (1992). Hypercorrection: Mistakes in production of vernacular African American English as a second dialect. Language and Communication 12:317–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauman, Richard (1975). Verbal art as performance. American Anthropologist 77:290311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Allan (1984). Language style as audience design. Language in Society 13:145204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Allan (1991). The language of news media. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bell, Allan (1992). Hit and miss: Referee design in the dialects of New Zealand television advertisements. Language and Communication 12:327340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Allan (1998). Back in style: Reworking audience design. In Rickford, & Eckert, (eds.), to appear.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, & Finegan, Edward (1994). eds. Sociolinguistic perspectives on register. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blom, Jan-Petter, & Gumperz, John J. (1972). Social meaning in linguistic structure: Code-switching in Norway. In Gumperz, John J. & Hymes, Dell (eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics, 407–34. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Broadbent, D. E. (1962). Attention and the perception of speech. Scientific American 206:143–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butters, Ronald R. (1993). The imitation of dialect for illegal purposes: An empirical study. Paper presented at NWAV 22, Ottawa.Google Scholar
Chambers, J. K. (1973). Canadian raising. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 18:113–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, J. K. (1989). Canadian raising: Blocking, fronting, etc. American Speech 64:7588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, F. R. (1980). Acoustic characteristics and intelligibility of clear and conversational speech at the segmental level. MA thesis, MIT.Google Scholar
Chen, F. R. et al. , (1983). Speaking clearly: Acoustic characteristics and intelligibility of stop consonants. Speech Communication Group, Working Papers II. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas (1985). “Hark, hark the lark”: Social motivations for phonological style-shifting. Language and Communication 5.3:153–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas (1998). Language, situation and the relational self: Theorising dialect-style in sociolinguis-tics. In Rickford, & Eckert, (eds.), to appear.Google Scholar
DiPaolo, Marianna (1992). Evidence for the instability of a low back vowel “merger.” Paper presented at NWAV 21, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Fant, Gunnar et al. , (1974). Swedish vowels in speech material of various complexity. In Fant, G. (ed.), Proceedings of the Speech Communication Seminar 2:139–47. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Finegan, Edward, & Biber, Douglas (1994). Register and social dialect variation: An integrated approach. In Biber, & Finegan, (eds.), 315–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flanagan, James L. (1955). A difference limen for vowel formant frequency. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 27:613–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giles, Howard, & Powesland, Peter F. (1975). Speech style and social evaluation. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William (1963). The social motivation of a sound change. Word 19:273307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William (1966). The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Labov, William (1972a). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William (1972b). Some principles of linguistic methodology. Language in Society 1:97120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William (1994). Principles of linguistic change. I: Internal factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter (1967). Three areas of experimental phonetics. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter (1993). A course in phonetics. 3rd ed. Orlando, FL: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.Google Scholar
LePage, R. B., & Tabouret-Keller, Andrée (1985). Acts of identity: Creole-based approaches to language and ethnicity. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moon, Seung-Jae (1991). An acoustic and perceptual study of undershoot in clear and citation-form speech. Diss., University of Texas, Austin.Google Scholar
Myers-Scotton, Carol (1993). Social motivations for codeswitching. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. (1992). Talking black and talking white: A study in variety imitation. In Hall, Joan H. et al. (eds), Old English and new: Papers in honor of Frederic G. Cassidy, 327–55. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. (1996). Whaddayaknow? The modes of folk linguistic awareness. Language Awareness 5.1: 4077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rampton, Ben (1998). Language crossing and the redefinition of reality. In Auer, Peter (ed.), Code-switching in conversation. London: Routledge, to appear.Google Scholar
Rickford, John, & Eckert, Penelope (1998), eds. Style and variation. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press, to appear.Google Scholar
Rickford, John, & McNair-Knox, Faye (1994). Addressee- and topic-influenced style shift. In Biber, & Finegan, (eds.), 235–76. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Romaine, Suzanne (1995). Bilingualism. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schilling-Estes, Natalie (1996). The linguistic and sociolinguistic status of /ay/ in Outer Banks English. Diss., University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Schilling-Estes, Natalie, & Schrider, Jessica (1996). The symbolization of islander identity: Sex- and gender-based variation in Ocracoke English. Paper presented at NWAV 25, Las Vegas.Google Scholar
Schilling-Estes, Natalie, & Wolfram, Walt (1994). Convergent explanation and alternative regularization patterns: werelweren't leveling in a vernacular English variety. Language Variation and Change 6: 273302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schilling-Estes, Natalie, & Wolfram, Walt (1997). Symbolic identity and language change: A comparative analysis of post-insular /ay/and/aw/. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 4:1.83104.Google Scholar
Shearme, J. N., & Holmes, J. N. (1962). An experimental study of the classification of sounds in continuous speech according to their distribution in the formant 1—formant 2 plane. In Sovijarvi, Antti and Aalto, Pentti (eds.), Proceedings of the 4th International Congress of Phonetic Science, 234–40. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael (1981). The limits of awareness. (Sociolinguistic working papers, 84.) Austin: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.Google Scholar
Thomas, Erik R. 1995. Phonetic actors and perceptual reanalyses in sound change. Diss., University of Texas, Austin.Google Scholar
Tsitsipis, Lukas D. (1989). Skewed performance and full performance in language obsolescence: The case of an Albanian variety. In Dorian, Nancy C. (ed.), Investigating obsolescence: Studies in language contraction and obsolescence, 139–48. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University press.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt (1991). Dialects and American English. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt, & Schilling-Estes, Natalie (1995a). Moribund dialects and the endangerment canon: The case of the Ocracoke brogue. Language 71:696721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfram, Walt, & Schilling-Estes, Natalie (1995b). On the social basis of phonetic resistance: The shifting status of Outer Banks /ay/. In Arnold, Jennifer et al. (eds.), Sociolinguistic variation: Data, theory, and analysis, 6982. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt, & Schilling-Estes, Natalie (1996). Dialect change and maintenance in a post-insular island community. In Schneider, Edgar W. (ed.), Varieties of English around the world: Focus on the USA, 103–48. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt, & Schilling-Estes, Natalie (1997). Hoi toide on the Outer Banks: The story of the Ocracoke Brogue. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar