No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Michael L. Geis, Speech acts and conversational interaction: Toward a theory of conversational competence. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press, 1995. Pp. xiv, 248.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 July 2012
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0047404500019758/resource/name/firstPage-S0047404500019758a.jpg)
- Type
- Reviews
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1998
References
REFERENCES
Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1995). “Discourse as an interactional achievement, III: The omnirelevance of action.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 28:3. 185–211. [Extended version published as “Issues of relevance for discourse analysis: Contingency in action, interaction and co-participant context,” in Hovy, Eduard H. & Scott, Donia (eds.), Computational and conversational discourse: Burning issues – an interdisciplinary account, 3–38 (Heidelberg: Springer, 1996).]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R. (1983). Intentionaliry. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar