Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wp2c8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-08T18:24:36.494Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Parameter setting within a socially realistic linguistics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2012

John Wilson  and
Alison Henry
John Wilson
Affiliation:
School of Behavioural and Communication Sciences, University of Ulster at Jordanstown, Newtonabbey, County Antrim BT37 OQB, Northern Ireland, U.K.j.wilson@ulst.ac.uk
Alison Henry
Affiliation:
School of Behavioural and Communication Sciences, University of Ulster at Jordanstown, Newtonabbey, County Antrim BT37 OQB, Northern Ireland, U.K.j.wilson@ulst.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article considers the theoretical and practical relationship between core linguistics and sociolinguistics in relation to the emergence of Principles and Parameters Theory. Parameters were introduced into core Chomskyan linguistics in an effort to account for variation between languages. However, as we argue – and as has long been known in sociolinguistics – languages (French, Italian etc.) are social rather than abstract products. In this sense, core linguistics may need to pay more attention than it has in the past to aspects of actual variation in order to understand the limits and range of parameters. Thus we argue that dialects of languages in themselves have parameters, and as such may be defined within parametric limits. Here we believe there is something of interest to sociolinguists, in terms both of structural definitions and of overall historical development. In general, then, while variation has always been central to sociolinguistics, it is now central, in one sense, to core linguistics; and here we have the opportunity to explore ways in which sociolinguistics and core linguistics may relate to each other in their interest in variation. (Parameters; variation; dialect; Belfast; Ireland)

Type
Research Article
Information
Language in Society , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , March 1998 , pp. 1 - 21
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Atkinson, Martin (1992). Children's syntax: An introduction to Principles and Parameters theory. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bailey, Charles-J. (1973). Variation and linguistic theory. Arlington, VA: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Bailey, Charles-J. (1987). Variation theory and so called “sociolinguistic” grammars. Language and Communication 7: 269–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beninca, Paola (1992), ed. Dialect variation and the theory of grammar. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Berdan, Robert (1975). The necessity of variable rules. In Fasold, Ralph & Shuy, Roger (eds.), Analysing variation in language, 11–27. Washington; DC:Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Bickerton, Derek (1971). Inherent variability and variable rules. Foundations of Language 7: 457–92.Google Scholar
Bromberger, Sylvain, & Halle, Morris (1989). Why phonology is different. In Hale, Kenneth & Keyser, Samuel Jay (eds.), The view from Building 20, 56–77. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Button, Graham; Coulter, Jeff; Lee, John R. E.; & Sharrock, Wes (1995). Computers, minds and conduct. Oxford: Polity.Google Scholar
Cameron, Deborah (1995). Verbal hygiene. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chambers, Jack (1994). Sociolinguistic theory. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Chambers, Jack & Trudgill, Peter (1980). Dialectology. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1976). Reflections on language. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1980). Rules and representations. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1981). Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1986). Knowledge of language. Its nature, origin, and use. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Lasnik, Harold (1995). The theory of principles and parameters. In Chomsky, 1995: 13–127.Google Scholar
Clahsen, Harold (1991). Constraints on parameter setting: A grammatical analysis of some acquisition stages in German Child Language. Language Acquisition 1: 361–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fasold, Ralph (1990). The sociolinguistics of society. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Finlay, Cathy (1987). Syntactic variation in the speech of Belfast schoolchildren. Unpublished D.Phil, thesis, University of Ulster.Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry (1994). The elm and the expert: Mentalese and its semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hale, Kenneth (1995). Universal grammar and the necessity of linguistic diversity. MIT, MS.Google Scholar
Harris, John (1996). Syntactic variation and dialect divergence. In Singh, Rajendra (ed.), Towards a critical sociolinguistics, 31–59. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, Alison (1995). Belfast English and Standard English: Dialect variation and parameter setting. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, Alison (1996). Viewing change in progress: The loss of V2 in Hiberno-English imperatives. In Van Kemenaden, Ans & Vincent, Nigel (eds.), Diachronic syntax: Functional heads and clause structure, 80–93. Cambridge & New York:Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Henry, Alison (1997). Imperative inversion in Belfast English. In Black, James and Motapanyane, V. (eds.), Microparametric syntax: Dialect variation in syntax. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Henry, Alison, & Wilson, John (1995). Language acquisition in conditions of variable input. Proposal to Economic Social and Research Council.Google Scholar
Hudson, Richard (1992). Teaching grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hyams, Nina (1986). Language acquisition and the theory of parameters. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaeggli, Osvaldo (1982). Topics in Romance syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard (1994). The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William (1994). Principles of linguistic change: Internal factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lebeaux, David (1987). Comments on Hyams. In Roeper, & Williams, (eds.), 23–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manzini, Rita, & Wexler, Kenneth (1987). Parameters, binding theory and learnability. Linguistic Inquiry 18:413–44.Google Scholar
Meisel, Jiirgen M. (1995). Parameters in acquisition. In Fletcher, Paul & MacWhinney, Brian (eds.), The handbook of child language, 10–35. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Milroy, James (1992). Linguistic variation and change. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Muller, Natascha (1994). Parameters cannot be reset: Evidence from the development of COMP. In Meisel, Jϋrgen M. (ed.), Bilingual first language acquisition: French and German grammatical development, 235–69. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, Stephen (1994). The language instinct. New York: Morrow.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Policansky, Linda (1976). Syntactic variation in Belfast English. Belfast Working Papers in Language and Linguistics 5: 217–31.Google Scholar
Riemsdijk, Henk van, & Williams, Edwin (1986). Introduction to the theory of grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sankoff, David (1998). Sociolinguistics and syntactic variation. In Newmeyer, Frederick (ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey, 4: 140–61. Cambridge &New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Neil, & Tsimpli, Ianthi-Maria (1995). The mind of a savant. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter (1983). On dialect. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter (1974). The social differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. (1978), ed. Sociolinguistic patterns in British English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Roeper, Thomas, & Williams, Edwin (1987), eds. Parameter setting. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wardhaugh, Ronald (1992). An introduction to sociolinguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Weinberg, Stephen (1976). The forces of nature. Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Science 28: 28–29.Google Scholar
Williams, Edwin (1987). Introduction. In Roeper, & Williams, (eds.), vii–xix.Google Scholar
Wilson, John (1993). The study of communication: Possibly? Semiotica 93: 123–38.Google Scholar