Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vpsfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-24T12:11:44.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Phonological change and the development of an urban dialect in Illinois1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Robert E. Callary
Robert E. Callary
Affiliation:
English Department, Northern Illinois University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The distribution of raised, nasalized variants of /æ/ in such words as hat, bag, and back in the speech of many Illinoisans cannot be explained by geographical or historical processes; rather the correlations are nearly isomorphic between raised variants of /æ/ and the size of the community in which the speaker was raised. Generally, the higher the variants, the more urban the speaker's background. Raised variants of /æ/ are discussed as they relate to contemporary sound change, to urban distributions, and to phonological context. (Urban dialects, sound change, American English, Illinois.)

Type
Articles: Ecology of Language
Information
Language in Society , Volume 4 , Issue 2 , August 1975 , pp. 155 - 169
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Babbitt, E. H. (1896). The English of the lower classes in New York City and vicinity. Dialect Notes 1. 457–64.Google Scholar
Bailey, C-J. (1970). Variation and language theory. University of Hawaii Working papers in linguistics 2. 161–234.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1966). The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Labov, W.Yaeger, M. & Steiner, R. (1972). A quantitative study of sound change in progress. Final report on National Science Foundation contract NSF–GS–3287. Philadelphia: U.S. Regional Survey.Google Scholar
Shuy, R. W. (1962). The northern–midland dialect boundary in Illinois. Publications of the American Dialect Society, 11 38.Google Scholar
Shuy, R. W.Wolfram, W. & Riley, W. (1967). A study of social dialects in Detroit. Final report, project 6–1347. Washington, D.C.: Office of Education. (Cited in Labov et al. (1972): 334).Google Scholar
Trager, G. (1930). The pronunciation of short a in American standard English. American Speech 5. 396–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trager, G. (1940). One phonemic entity becomes two: the case of short a. American Speech 15. 255–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, P. (ms). Linguistic change and diffusion: description and explanation in sociolinguistic dialect geography.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. (1974). The social differe.ztiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar