Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T17:10:36.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Variation Studies and Historical Linguistics - C.J.N. Bailey & R. Shuy (eds), New ways of analyzing variation in English. Washington: Georgetown University Press, 1973.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Roger Lass
Roger Lass
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Language in Society , Volume 5 , Issue 2 , August 1976 , pp. 219 - 229
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andersen, H. (1972). Diphthongization. Language 48. 11–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, H. (1973). Abductive and deductive change. Language 49. 765–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J. M. & Jones, C. (1974). Historical Linguistics. 2 Vols. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Anttila, R. (1972). Introduction to historical and comparative linguistics. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Anttila, R. (1974). Formalization as degeneration in historical linguistics. In Anderson & Jones (1974: I, 1–32).Google Scholar
Anttila, R. (1975a). Was there a generative historical linguistics? In Dahlstedt (1975: 70–92).Google Scholar
Anttila, R. (1975b). Exception as regularity in phonology. In Dressler & Mares (1975: 91–100).Google Scholar
Bloomfield, L. (1933). Language. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Dahlstedt, K-H. (1975). The Nordic languages and modern linguistic 2. Almqvist &Wiksell.Google Scholar
Dressler, W. (1975). Methodisches zu Allegro-Regeln. In Dressler & Mareš (1975: 219–34).Google Scholar
Dressler, W. & Mareš, F. V. (1975). Phonologica 1972. Akten der zweiten Internationalen Phonologie-Tagung, Wien, 5–8 September, 1972. München/Salzburg: Wilhelm Fink Verlag.Google Scholar
Dressler, W. et al. (1972). Phonologische Schnellsprechregeln in der Wiener Umgangssprache. Wiener Linguistische Gazette I. 1–29.Google Scholar
Fries, C. C. (1940). On the development of the structural use of word-order in Modern English. Language 16. 199–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, R. & Halle, M. (1956). Fundamentals of language. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
King, R. D. (1969). Historical linguistics and generative grammar. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
King, R. D. (1975). Integrating linguistic change. In Dahlstedt (1975: 47–69).Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. (1971). Historical linguistics. In Dingwall, W. V., A survey of linguistic science, 576–649. College Park: Linguistics Program, University of Maryland.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1963). The social motivation of a sound change. Word 19. 273–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W. (1972). The internal evolution of linguistic rules. In Stockwell, R. P., Macaulay, R. K. S., Linguistic change and generative theory, 101–71. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1975). The quantitative study of linguistic structure. In Dahlstedt (1975: 188–244).Google Scholar
Labov, W., Yeager, M. & Steiner, R. (1972). A quantitative study of sound change in progress. 2 Vols. Philadelphia: The U.S. Regional Survey.Google Scholar
Lass, R. (1969). On the derivative status of phonological rules: the function of metarules in sound change. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Lass, R. (1974a). Linguistic orthogenesis? Scots vowel quantity and the English length conspiracy. In Anderson & Jones (1974, II, 311–52).Google Scholar
Lass, R. (1974b). Strategic design as the motivation for a sound shift: the rationale of Grimm's Law. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 15 51–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lass, R. (forthcoming a). English phonology and phonological theory: synchronic and diachronic studies. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Lass, R. (forthcoming b). Projection and mapping in phonological reconstruction. To appear in the Proceedings of the 1976 Conference on Historical Phonology, Ustronie.Google Scholar
Luick, K. (1964). Historische Grammatik der englischen Sprache. 2 vols. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal knowledge.London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Postal, P. M. (1968). Aspects of phonological theory. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Reighard, J. (1974). Variable rules in historical linguistics. In Anderson & Jones (1974, 1, 251–62).Google Scholar
Twaddell, W. F. (1938). A note on Old High German umlaut. Monatshefte für deutschen Unterricht 30, 177–81.Google Scholar
Weinreich, U., Labov, W. & Herzog, M. (1968). Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In Lehmann, W. P., Malkiel, Y., Directions for historical linguistics: a symposium, 95–195. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar