Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T05:24:20.692Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is phonology going haywire in dying languages? Phonological variations in Chipewyan and Sarcee*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Eung-Do Cook
Eung-Do Cook
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, The University of Calgary
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The two most conspicuous phenomena reported on dying languages are (a) structural (and stylistic) simplifications and (b) dramatic increases of variability due to incongruent and idiosyncratic “change.” The phonological data from two Athapaskan languages, as well as other published data (Dorian 1973, 1978; Hill 1978; Schmidt 1985a), demonstrate that underlying the apparent degeneration of the system there is an orderly progression which is viewed as a retarded process of language acquisition. Different semispeakers reach different levels of maturity due to different degrees of retardation, consequently increasing variability and complexity for the total system, whereas each idiolect undergoes systematic developmental stages albeit retarded, decreasing eventually structural (and stylistic) profusion. Therefore, a dying language mirrors the successive stages of ontogenesis. (Historical linguistics, language acquisition, language death, language contact, bilingualism, sociolinguistics)

Type
Articles
Information
Language in Society , Volume 18 , Issue 2 , June 1989 , pp. 235 - 255
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brown, R. (1973). A first language: The early stage. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, H. H., & Clark, E. V. (1977). Psychology and language: An introduction to psycholinguistics. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Cook, E.-D. (1971). Morphophonemics of two Sarcee classifiers. International Journal of American Linguistics 37: 152–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, E.-D. (1977). Syllable weight in three Northern Athapaskan languages. International Journal of American Linguistics 43: 159–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, E.-D. (1980). On “Variability of Chipewyan consonants” by Scollon. International Journal of American Linguistics 46: 313–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, E.-D. (1983). Chipewyan vowels. International Journal of American Linguistics 49: 413–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, E.-D. (1984). A Sarcee grammar. Vancouver: University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
Donegan, P. J. (1985). How learnable is phonology? In Dressler, W. V. & Tonelli, L. (eds.), Natural phonology from Eisenstadt. Padova: CLESP.Google Scholar
Dorian, N. C. (1973). Grammatical change in a dying dialect. Language 49: 413–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorian, N. C. (1978). The fate of morphological complexity in language death. Language 54: 590–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dressler, W. (1972). On the phonology of language death. In P. M. Peranteau (ed.), Papers from the Eighth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society 448–57.Google Scholar
Dressler, W., & Wodak-Leodolter, R. (1977). Language preservation and language death in Brittany. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 12: 33–44.Google Scholar
Goddard, P. E. (1915). Sarcee texts. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology 11: 179–277.Google Scholar
Haas, M. R. (1968). Notes on Chipewyan dialect. International Journal of American Linguistics 34: 165–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, D. (1980). Word shortening in Snowdrift Chipewyan. Calgary Working Papers in Linguistics 6: 61–68.Google Scholar
Hill, J. H. (1978). Language death, language contact, and language evolution. In McCormack, W. C. & Wurm, S. A. (eds.), Approaches to language. The Hague: Mouton. 45–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hymes, D. (ed.) (1971). Pidginization and creolization of languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1968). Child language, aphasia, and phonological universali. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jehn, R. D. (1980). Aspects of current phonological change in Snowdrift Chipewyan. Calgary Working Papers in Linguistics 6: 51–60.Google Scholar
Krauss, M. E., & Golla, V. (1981). Northern Athapaskan languages. In W. Sturtevant (ed.), Handbook of North American Indians 6: 67–85.Google Scholar
Krauss, M. E., & Leer, J. (1981). Athabaskan, Eyak, and Tlingit sonorants. (Alaska Native Language Research Centre Research Paper No. 5.) Fairbanks: University of Alaska.Google Scholar
Li, F.-K. (1933). A list of Chipewyan stems. International Journal of American Linguistics 7: 122–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, F.-K. (1946). Chipewyan. In Hoijer, H. et al. Linguistic structures of Native America. (Viking Fund Publications in Anthropology 6.) 398–423. New York: The Viking Fund, Inc.Google Scholar
Maddieson, I. (1984). Patterns of sounds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, R. W. (1987). Preference laws and gradient change. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 32: 115–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ochs, E. (1982). Ergativity and word order in Samoan child language. Language 58: 646–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, K. D. (1978). A note on Fort Resolution Chipewyan. International Journal of American Linguistics 44: 144–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, W. A. (1950). Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals. American Sociological Review 15: 351–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samarin, W. (1971). Salient and substantive pidginization. In Hymes (1971). 117–40.Google Scholar
Schmidt, A. (1985a). The fate of ergativity in dying Dyirbal. Language 61: 378–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, A. (1985b). Young people's Dyirbal: An examination of language death from Australia. (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics Supplementary Volume.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scollon, R. (1979). 236 years of variability in Chipewyan consonants. International Journal of American Linguistics 45: 332–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, N. V. (1975). Universal tendencies in the child's acquisition of phonology. In O'Connor, N. (ed.), Language, cognitive deficits, and retardation. London and Boston: Butterworths. 47–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voegelin, C. F., & Voegelin, F. M. (1977). Is Tübatulabal de-acquisition relevant to theories of language acquisition? International Journal of American Linguistics 43: 333–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar