Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-28T13:00:10.260Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

William Labov, Sociolinguistic patterns. (Conduct and Communication, 4.) Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1972.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Elizabeth Closs Traugott
Elizabeth Closs Traugott
Affiliation:
Committe on Linguistics and Department of English, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Language in Society , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , April 1975 , pp. 89 - 107
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bailey, C.-J. N. (1997). Trying to talk in the new paradigm. Papers in linguistics 4. 312–38.Google Scholar
Bailey, C.-J.N. (1972). The integration of linguistic theory: internal reconstruction and the comparative method in descriptive analysis. In Stockwell, R. P. and Macaulay, R. K. S. (eds), Linguistic change and generative theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 22–31.Google Scholar
Bailey, C.-J. N. (1973). The patterning of language variation. In Bailey, R. W. and Robinson, J. L. (eds), Varieties of present-day English. New York: Macmillan. 18–86.Google Scholar
Bailey, C. J. & Shuy, R. W. (eds) (1973). New ways of analyzing variation in English. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Baron, N. (1972). The evolution of English periphrastic causatives: contributions to a general theory of linguistic variation and change. Ph.D. diss., Stanford University.Google Scholar
Bever, T. G. & Langendoen, D. T. (1972). The interaction of speech perception and grammatical structure in the evolution of language. In Stockwell, R. P. and Macaulay, R. K. S. (eds), Lingustic change and generative theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 32–95.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D. (forthcoming). On the nature of a creole continuum. Lg.Google Scholar
Cedergren, H. J. & Sankoff, D. (forthcoming). Variable rules: performance as a statistical reflection of competence. Lg.Google Scholar
Chen, M. (1973). On the formal expression of natural rules in phonology. JL 9. 223–49.Google Scholar
Dyen, I. (1969). Reconstruction, the comparative method, and the proto-language uniformity assumption. JL. 45. 499–518.Google Scholar
Ellis, J. & Ure, J. (1967). Language varieties: register. Encyclopedia of linguistics, information and control. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. A.Diglossia. Word 15. 325–40.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. A. & Slobin, D. I. (eds) (1973). Studies in child language development. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J. (1973). A grammarian looks to sociolinguistics. In Shuy, R. W. (ed.), Georgetown University monograph series on languages and linguistics 25. 273–87.Google Scholar
Giglioli, P. P. (ed.) (1972). Language and social context. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. H. (1966). Language universals. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J. J. & Hymes, D. (eds) (1972). Directions in sociolinguistics: the ethnography of communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Halle, M. (1962). Phonology in generative grammar. Word 18. 54–72.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1973). Explorations in the function of language. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Householder, F. W. (1971). Linguistic speculations. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Householder, M. A. K. (1972). The principal step in linguistic change. Language sciences 20. 1–5.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. (ed.) (1964). Language in culture and society. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. (ed.) (1971). Pidginization and creolization of languages. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. (1973a). The scope of sociolinguistics. In Shuy, R. W. (ed.), Georgetown University monograph series on languages and linguistics 25. 313–33.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. (1973b). Speech and language: on the origins and foundations of inequality among speakers. Daedalus Summer 1973. 59–85.Google Scholar
Katz, J. J. & Bever, T. G. (forthcoming). The fall and rise of empiricism.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. (1968). Linguistic universals and linguistic change. In Bach, E. and Harms, R. T. (eds), Universals in linguistic theory. New York: Holt, Rinehard & Winston.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kurylowicz, J. (1972). The role of deictic elements in linguistic evolution. Semiotica. 174–83.Google Scholar
Laberge, S. (1972). Changement dans l'usage des pronoms indéfinis chez les Montréalais. M.A. Thesis, University of Montreal.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1966) The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1972). Some principles of linguistic methodology. LinS. 1. 97–120.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1973). The linguistic consequences of being a lame. LinS. 2. 81–115.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (forthcoming). On the use of the present to explain the past. Proceedings of the XIth international congress of linguists, Bologna, August–Sept. 1972.Google Scholar
Labov, W., Yaeger, M. & Steiner, R. (1972). A quantitative study of sound change in progress. NSF Report, Contract NSF-GS-3287. University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (forthcoming). Interview with Herman, Parret. In Parret, H. (ed.), Discussing language. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Lakoff, R. (1972). Language in context. Lg. 48. 907–27.Google Scholar
Ohala, J. J. (forthcoming). Experimental historical phonology. In Anderson, J. M. and Jones, C. (eds), Proceedings of the First international congress on historical linguistics, Edinburgh, 09. 1973.Google Scholar
Pride, J. B. (1973). Review of Gumperz, J. J. and Hymes, D. (eds), Directions in sociolinguistics. LinS. 2. 245–63.Google Scholar
Ross, J. R. (1972). The category squish: endstation Hauptwort. Papers from the eighth regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. 316–63.Google Scholar
Salmon, V. (1965). Sentence structures in colloquial Shakespearian English. Transactions of the Philological Society. 1965. 105–40.Google Scholar
Sankoff, G. Above and beyond phonology in variable rules. In Bailey, C. -J. N. and Shuy, R. W. (eds), New ways of analyzing variation in English. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press. 44–61,.Google Scholar
Sankoff, G. & Laberge, S. (1973). On the acquisition of native speakers by a language. Kivung 6. 32–47 (Journal of the Linguistic Society of Papua).Google Scholar
Sapir, E. (1921). Language: an introduction to the study of speech. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar
Schneider, G. D. (1966). West African Pidgin-English: a descriptive linguistic analysis with texts and glossary from the Camaroon Area. Athens, Ohio.Google Scholar
Stalnaker, R. C. (1972). Pragmatics. In Davidson, D. and Harmon, G. (eds), Semantics of natural language. Dordrecht: Reidel. 380–97.Google Scholar
St&e, D. (1969). The acquisition of phonetic representation. Papers from the fifth regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. 443–54.Google Scholar
Sudnow, D. (ed.), (1972). Studies in social interaction. New York: Macmillan, The Free Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C. (forthcoming a).Language change, language acquisition, and the genesis of spatio-temporal terms. In Anderson, J. M. and Jones, C. (eds), Proceedings of the First international conference on historical linguistics, Edinburgh, 09. 1973.Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C. (forthcoming b). Changement linguistique; sa relation avec l'acquisition de la langage maternelle. Langages.Google Scholar
Weinreich, U. (1953). Languages in contact. New York: Publications of the Linguistic Society of America.Google Scholar
Weinreich, U., Labov, W. & Herzog, M. I. (1968). Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In Lehmann, W. P. and Malkiel, Y. (eds), Directions for historical linguistics. Austin: University of Austin Press.Google Scholar
Whinnom, K. (1971). Linguistic hybridization and the ‘special case’ of pidgins and creoles. In Hymes, D. (ed.), Pidginization and creolization of languages. New York: Cambridge University Press. 91–115.Google Scholar