Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wtssw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-09T11:39:55.293Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Community rules and speaker behavior: Individual adherence to group constraints on (ING)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 September 2015

Jon Forrest
Jon Forrest*
Affiliation:
North Carolina State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper investigates the degree to which individual speakers follow the morphosyntactic hierarchy governing grammatical constraints on (ING) in the Southern U.S. city of Raleigh, North Carolina. (ING) was used as the variable of study for its well-studied internal constraints and comparability to previous studies on the internal constraints of t/d deletion. A lexical category constraint hierarchy for the community was determined via multivariate mixed-effects statistical models, and each speaker's (ING) pattern was compared to this hierarchy. Results show maintenance in grammatical constraints even when taking phonological factors into account, unlike some work on t/d deletion. Uniformity exists across speakers with respect to the ordering of internal constraints despite the overall decline in rates of –in over time, but constraint weights (expressed as log odds) vary significantly from speaker to speaker, with no correlates to social or internal factors. These results have consequences for representation of individuals in terms of an aggregate pattern, questioning the consistency of factor weight values at the speaker level despite consistent ordering of constraints.

Type
Research Article
Information
Language Variation and Change , Volume 27 , Issue 3 , October 2015 , pp. 377 - 406
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bell, Alan. (1984). Language style as audience design. Language in Society 17:145–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Britain, David. (1997). Dialect contact and phonological reallocation: “Canadian raising” in the English Fens. Language in Society 26:15–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn. (2007). Accent, (ING), and the social logic of listener perceptions. American Speech 82:32–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn. (2008). I'll be the judge of that: Diversity in social perceptions of (ING). Language in Society 37:637–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn. (2010). The sociolinguistic variant as a carrier of social meaning. Language Variation and Change 22:423–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, Jeannine, & Hilliard, Sarah. (2005). Shifting parameters of individual and group variation: African American English on Roanoke Island. Journal of English Linguistics 33:161–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cedergren, Henrietta J., & Sankoff, David. (1974). Variable rules: Performance as a statistical reflection of competence. Language 50:333–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Lynn, & Watson, Kevin. (2013). Comparing individual speaker constraints with the speech community: /t/ debuccalisation in English. Paper presented at the Variation and Language Processing Conference (VALP), Christchurch, New Zealand, January 16–18.Google Scholar
Cofer, Thomas. (1972). Linguistic variability in a Philadelphia Community. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Dodsworth, Robin, & Kohn, Mary. (2012). Urban rejection of the vernacular: The SVS undone. Language Variation and Change 24:221–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drummond, Rob. (2012). Aspects of identity in a second language: ING variation in the speech of Polish migrants living in Manchester, UK. Language Variation and Change 24:107–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, John L. (1958). Social influences on the choice of a linguistic variant. Word-Journal of the International Linguistic Association 14:47–56.Google Scholar
Forrest, Jon. (2015). Frequency effects and vowel lenition in (ING). Paper presented at American Dialect Society (ADS), Portland, OR, January 8–11.Google Scholar
Frey, William H. (1995). Immigration and internal migration “flight” from U.S. metropolitan areas: Toward a new demographic balkanization. Urban Studies 32:733–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fridland, Valerie. (2000). The Southern Vowel Shift in Memphis, TN. Language Variation and Change 11:267–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fridland, Valerie. (2001). The social dimension of the Southern Vowel Shift: Gender, age and class. Journal of Sociolinguistics 5:233–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fridland, Valerie. (2008). Regional differences in perceiving vowel tokens on Southernness, education, and pleasantness ratings. Language Variation and Change 20:67–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guy, Gregory R. (1980). Variation in the group and the individual: The case of final stop deletion. In Labov, W. (ed.), Locating language in time and space. New York: Academic Press. 1–36.Google Scholar
Guy, Gregory R. (1991a). Contextual conditioning in variable lexical phonology. Language Variation and Change 3:223–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guy, Gregory R. (1991b). Explanation in variable phonology: An exponential model of morphological constraints. Language Variation and Change 3:1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guy, Gregory R. (2004). Dialect unity, dialect contrast: the role of variable constraints. Talk presented at the Meertens Institute, Amsterdam, August.Google Scholar
Hazen, Kirk. (2006). IN/ING variable. In Brown, K. (ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics. 2nd ed.Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Hazen, Kirk. (2008). (ING): A vernacular baseline for English in Appalachia. American Speech 83:116–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazen, Kirk. (2011). Flying high above the social radar: Coronal stop deletion in modern Appalachia. Language Variation and Change 23:105–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, Michol F., & Walker, James A. (2010). Ethnolects and the city: Ethnic orientation and linguistic variation in Toronto English. Language Variation and Change 22:37–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houston, Ann. (1985). Continuity and change in English morphology: The variable (ING). PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Kendall, Tyler. (2013). Speech rate, pause and sociolinguistic variation: Studies in corpus sociophonetics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiesling, Scott. (1998). Men's identities and sociolinguistic variation: The case of fraternity men. Journal of Sociolinguistics 2:69–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. (1966). The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (1969). Contraction, deletion, and inherent variability of the English copula. Language 45:715–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. (1989). The child as linguistic historian. Language Variation and Change 1:85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. (2001). Principles of linguistic change. Vol. 2. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (2007). Transmission and diffusion. Language 83:344–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William, Ash, Sharon, & Boberg, Charles. (2006). The atlas of North American English: Phonetics, phonology, and sound change: A multimedia reference tool. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lass, Roger. (1992). Phonology and morphology. In Blake, N. (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English Language. Vol. 2: 1066–1476. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 23–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyerhoff, Miriam, & Schleef, Erik. (2012). Variation, contact and social indexicality in the acquisition of (ing) by teenage migrants. Journal of Sociolinguistics 16:398–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyerhoff, Miriam, & Walker, James A. (2007). The persistence of variation in individual grammars: Copula absence in “urban soujourners” and their stay-at-home peers, Bequia (St Vincent and the Grenadines). Journal of Sociolinguistics 11:346–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. (1991). Sorting out the variables in sociolinguistic theory. American Speech 66:33–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team. (2014). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at: http://www.R-project.org/. Accessed August 10, 2014.Google Scholar
Reid, E. (1978). Social and stylistic variation in the speech of children: Some evidence from Edinburgh. In Trudgill, P. (ed.), Sociolinguistic patterns in British English. London: Edward Arnold. 158–171.Google Scholar
Rickford, John, & McNair-Knox, Faye. (1994). Addressee-and topic-influenced style shift: A quantitative sociolinguistic study. In Biber, D. & Finegan, E. (eds.), Sociolinguistic perspectives on register. New York: Oxford University Press. 235–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rickford, John, & Price, Mackenzie. (2013). Girlz II women: Age-grading, language change and stylistic variation. Journal of Sociolinguistics 17:143–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Julie. (1994). Acquisition of variable rules: (-t,d) deletion and (ing) production in preschool children. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Shuy, Roger W., Wolfram, Walter A., & Riley, William K. (1968). Linguistic correlates of social stratification in Detroit speech. Final report, Cooperative Research Project Number 6-1347. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Dept. of Health, Education, and Welfare, Office of Education, Bureau of Research.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali, & Temple, Rosalind. (2005). New perspectives on an ol' variable: (t, d) in British English. Language Variation and Change 17:281–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Temple, Rosalind. (2014). Where and what is (t,d)? A case study in taking a step back in order to advance sociophonetics. In Celata, C. & Calamai, S. (eds.), Advances in sociophonetics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 97–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. (1986). Dialects in contact. New York: B. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter, Gordon, Elizabeth, Lewis, Gillian, & Maclagan, Margaret (2000). Determinism in new-dialect formation and the genesis of New Zealand English. Journal of Linguistics 36:299–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, Suzanne Evans. (2012). Real-time evidence for age grad(ing) in late adolescence. Language Variation and Change 24:179–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wald, Benji, & Shopen, Timothy. (1985). A researcher's guide to the sociolinguistic variable (ING). In Shopen, T. & Williams, J. M. (eds.), Style and variables in English. Winthrop Publishers. 219–249.Google Scholar
Walker, James A. (2012). Form, function, and frequency in phonological variation. Language Variation and Change 24:397–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel, Labov, William, & Herzog, Maivin. (1968). Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In Lehmann, W. P. & Malkiel, Y. (eds.), Directions for historical linguistics. Austin: University of Texas Press. 97–195.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt, Christian, Donna, & Center for Applied Linguistics. (1976). Appalachian speech. Arlington: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt, & Reaser, Jeff. (2014). Talkin' tar heel: How our voices tell the story of North Carolina. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar