Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-txr5j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-22T16:15:28.121Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Application of pulse power technology to inertial confinement fusion: Focusing and propagation of proton beam

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2009

K. Niu
Affiliation:
Teikyo University of Technology, Uruido, Ichihara, Chiba 290–01, Japan

Abstract

It is the aim of this article to design a fusion power plant whose electric output power is 1 GW and find a way for breaking through fusion technically and energy economically. Proton beams whose total energy is 12 MJ, pulse width 30 ns, and beam number 6 are chosen here as the energy driver. Because of the low quality of these proton beams, the target should be indirect driven and its radius should be large. The target with the radius of 8.7 mm is the spherical cryogenic hollow one, which has double shells and five layers. The reactor has double solid walls. The inner wall rotates around the axis to induce a centrifugal acceleration. Flibe as the coolant protects the solid walls from damage and breeds tritium. The key technology of this power plant is for beam focusing and propagation. To suppress beam divergence by the electrostatic force due to unneutralized proton charge, simultaneous electron beam launching is proposed. When the excess electron beam current is –50 kA, the induced magnetic field in the azimuthal direction confines the beam in a radius of 5 mm, provided that the beam path is covered by the metal guide whose radius is 6 mm.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Cook, D.L. 1991 Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 36, 2480.Google Scholar
Kaneda, T. & Nru, K. 1989 Laser Part. Beams 7, 207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehlhorn, T. et al. 1991 In Abstracts of the 10th International Workshop on Laser Interaction, Monterey, p. 45.Google Scholar
Murakami, M. & Meyer-Ter-Vehn, J. 1991a Nucl. Fusion 31, 1315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murakami, M. & Meyer-Ter-Vehn, J. 1991b Nucl. Fusion 31, 1331.Google Scholar
Nru, K. & Aoki, T. 1988 Fluid Dyn. Res. 4, 195.Google Scholar
Niu, K. & Kawata, S. 1987 Fusion Tech. 11, 365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niu, K. et al. 1988 Laser Part. Beams 6, 149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niu, K. et al. 1991a Laser Part. Beams 9, 149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niu, K. et al. 1991b Laser Part. Beams 9, 283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tahir, N.A. & Arnolds, R.C. 1991 Phys. Fluids B 3, 1717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tahir, N.A. & Deutsch, C. 1991 In Abstracts of the 10th International Workshop on Laser Interaction, Monterey, p. 71.Google Scholar
Tamba, M. et al. 1983 Laser Part. Beams 1, 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar