Hostname: page-component-68945f75b7-72kh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-06T05:00:25.356Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Preheating of heavy-ion-beam targets by secondary particles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2009

M. M. Basko
M. M. Basko
Affiliation:
Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, B. Cheremushkinskaja 25, Moscow 117259, USSR
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The contribution of different sorts of secondary particles to the preheating of thermonuclear targets driven by heavy-ion beams is analyzed. Two types of illumination geometry are considered: side-on and face-on locations of the fuel with respect to the ion beam. It is shown that a substantial preheating can be expected from (1) nuclear fission fragments for the face-on fuel position and (2) δ-electrons and low-Z nuclear fragments for the side-on fuel location. All the X-ray and gamma photons of various origin are shown to produce a negligible fuel heating.

Type
Research Article
Information
Laser and Particle Beams , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , March 1992 , pp. 189 - 200
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ahlen, S. P. 1980 Rev. Mod. Phys. 52, 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akhiezer, A. I. & Berestetzkh, V. B. 1969 Kvantovaja elektrodinamika (Quantum Electrodynamics) (Nauka, Moscow).Google Scholar
Anholt, R. & Hoffmann, D. H. H. 1985 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 240, 567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anholt, R. et al. 1984 Phys. Rev. A 30, 2234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anholt, R. et al. 1986 Phys. Rev. A 33, 2270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, R. C. & Meyer-Ter-Vehn, J. 1987 Rep. Prog. Phys. 50, 559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertini, R. et al. 1973 Phys. Lett. 45B, 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beynon, T. D. & Smith, E. H. 1985 Phys. Lett. 109A, 163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradt, H. L. & Peters, B. 1950 Phys. Rev. 77, 54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jain, P. L. et al. 1984 Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 1763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, H. W. & Motz, J. W. 1959 Rev. Mod. Phys. 31, 920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer-Ter-Vehn, J. 1989 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 278, 25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohrlich, F. & Carlson, B. C. 1954 Phys. Rev. 93, 38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warwick, A. I. et al. 1983 Phys. Rev. C 27, 1083.Google Scholar
Zel'Dovich, Ya. B. & Raizer, Yu. P. 1967 Physics of Shock Waves and High-Temperature Hydrodynamic Phenomena (Academic, New York).Google Scholar