Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T10:26:01.488Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Synergism in inertial confinement fusion: a total direct energy conversion package

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2009

M. A. Prelas  and
E. J. Charlson
M. A. Prelas
Affiliation:
College of Engineering, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211
E. J. Charlson
Affiliation:
College of Engineering, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The products of fusion reactions have unique properties which can be used for direct energy conversion. These products are neutrons and ions. Neutrons can be transported very long distances through solid materials and can interact with certain elements which have a very high absorption cross section. Ions on the other hand have a very short transport length even in a gaseous medium. It is possible to utilize these products in an inertial confinement fusion reactor with two different direct energy conversion devices: a nuclear-pumped laser using neutrons from the fusion reaction; a photon generator material combined with a photovoltaic converter using the ionic fusion products.

It will be argued that a nuclear-pumped laser can be more efficient than a conventional laser. It will also be shown that an advanced energy conversion concept based on photon production and photovoltaics can produce ICF system efficiencies of 56%.

Type
Research Article
Information
Laser and Particle Beams , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , August 1989 , pp. 449 - 466
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Angrist, S. 1971 Direct Energy Conversion, Allyn and Bacon Inc., Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Boody, F. P. et al. 1980 ‘Nuclear Production of Singlet-Delta O2’, Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc., 34, 820.Google Scholar
Brandhorst, H. et al. 1975 ‘Interim Solar Cell Testing Procedures for Terrestrial Applications’, NASA TM X-71771.Google Scholar
Cole, T. 1983 ‘Thermoelectric Energy Conversion with Solid Electrolytes’, Science, 221 (4614), 915–920.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, R., et al. 1988 ‘Critical Evaluation of the Status of the Areas for Future Research Regarding the Wide Band Gap Semiconductors Diamond, Gallium Nitride and Silicon Carbide’, Mails. Sci. and Engr., B1, p 77–104.Google Scholar
Dettmer, J. W. & Garscadden, A. 1979 ‘Fractional Power Transfer and Ion Formation Rates in Oxygen and Oxygen-Iodine Mixtures’, 32nd Annual Gaseous Electronics Conf., Pittsburgh, Penn.Google Scholar
Green, M. et al. 1984 ‘19·1% Efficient Silicon Solar Cell’, Appl. Phys. Lett. 44, (12).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, G. R. & Wurman, J. M. 1964 ‘Formation of Ozone from Oxygen by the Action of Ionizing Radiations’, Discussions of the Faraday Society, 37, 87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lien, J. 1973 A New Silicon MOS Photovoltaic Diode, PhD Thesis, Univ. of MO- Columbia.Google Scholar
Loferski, J. 1972 ‘An Introduction to the Physics of Solar Cells’, National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Loferski, J. 1956 J. Appl. Physics, 27, p 777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miley, G. H. 1987 Nuclear Engineering Department, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, personal communication.Google Scholar
Miley, G. H. 1984 ‘Review of Nuclear-Pumped Lasers’, Laser Interactions and Related Plasma Phenomena, Vol. 6, Hora, H., and Miley, G., Editors, Plenum Press, 47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miley, G. H. 1979 ‘University of Illinois Nuclear-Pumped Laser Program’, Nuclear-Pumped Laser Workshop, NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, July 25–26, 1979.Google Scholar
Miley, G. H. et al. June 1977 ‘A Laser Fusion Concept Using D-D-T Pellets with a DNP Laser Feedback System’, IEEE/OSA Conf.Google Scholar
Miley, G. H. 1977 Direct Nuclear Pumped Lasers: Status and Potential Applications, Laser Interactions and Related Plasma Phenomena, (Editors Schwarz, H. and Hora, H.), Plenum Press, 4A, 181–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prelas, M. A. et al. 1988 ‘Nuclear Driven Flashlamps’, Lasers and Particle Beams, 6(1), 25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prelas, M. et al. 1984 ‘A Direct Energy Conversion Technique Based on an Aerosol Core Reactor Concept’, 1984 IEEE Int. Conf. on Plasma Sci., IEEE Publication No. 84CH1958–8,38.Google Scholar
Prelas, M. A., Romero, J. B. & Person, E. F. 1982 ‘A Critical Review of Fusion Systems for Radiolytic Conversion of Inorganics to Gaseous Fuels’, Nuclear Technology/Fusion, 2(2), 143.Google Scholar
Prelas, M. A. 1981 ‘A Potential UV Fusion Lightbulb for Energy Conversion’, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc., 26(7), 1045.Google Scholar
Prelas, M. A., Romero, J. B. & Pearson, E. F. (June 8-August 14, 1981), ‘Radiolytic Production of Fuel Gases from Abundant Inorganic Resources’, in Basic Research Opportunities for Lasting Fuel Gas Supplies from Inorganic Resources, Chapter 5, Final Report for Gas Research Institute Contract *5081–360–0435, Gas Research Institute, 8600 West Bryn Mawr Avenue, Chicago, Illinois, USA 60631.Google Scholar
Prinz, J. 1982 ‘Bipolar Transistor Action in Ion Implanted Diamond’, Appl. Phys. Letts., 41(10).Google Scholar
Queisser, H. 1972 ‘Theoretical Efficiency Considerations for Photovoltaic Energy Converters’, Solar Cells, National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Vavilov, V. et al. 1979 Sov. Phys. Semicond. 13, p 635.Google Scholar
Vavilov, V. et al. 1972 Sov. Phys. Semicond., 6, p 741.Google Scholar
Wolf, M. 1960 ‘Limitations and Possibilities for Improvement of Photovoltaic Energy Converters,'’ Proc. IRE, 48, p 1246–1263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wysocki, J. & Rappaport, P. 1960 J. Appl. Physics, 31, p 571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar