Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T04:36:30.409Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nonmarket Imperialism in the Prehispanic Americas: The Inka Occupation of the Titicaca Basin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Charles Stanish*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095

Abstract

This paper analyzes the expansion of the Inka state into the Lake Titicaca Basin of the south-central Andes. While the expansion of the Inka state can be modeled in general terms as a type of core-periphery transformation typical of all preindustrial empires, I argue that the particular cultural context in which it developed determined the nature of its expansion strategies. This context was characterized by a nonmarket political economy in which reciprocal, redistributive, and nonmarket trade mechanisms predominated. Archaeological and historical data indicate that the Inka occupation was characterized by profound changes in the local political economy in the Titicaca Basin. I argue that the lack of market systems in central Andean society was a key factor that affected the strategies of imperial control in this major Inka provincial territory, promoting highly intrusive labor and population control mechanisms. This historical context differed from other areas of the Prehispanic Americas, such as central Mexico, where market systems promoted tribute-in-kind strategies that involved less intrusive strategies of imperial expansion.

Este artículo analiza la expansión del estado incaico hacia la cuenca del Lago Titicaca de los Andes sur-centrales. Mientras que la expansión del estado incaico se puede modelar en términos de los "sistemas mundiales," típicos de todos los imperios preindustriales, sugiero que el contexto cultural particular en el cual se desarrolló determinó la naturaleza de las estrategias de expansión. Este contexto fue caracterizado por un economía política sin mecanismos de mercado, en la que predominó la reciprocidad, la redistribución y el trueque sin mercado. Los datos arqueológicos e históricos indican que la ocupación incaica estuvo caracterizada por cambios profundos en la economía política local en la Cuenca del Titicaca. Sugiero que la falta de mecanismos de mercado en la sociedad andina fue un factor clave que afectó la estrategia de control imperial en esta importante provincia incaica, promoviendo mecanismos de control de la fuerza de trabajo y la población. Este contexto histórico se distingue de otras áreas de la América prehispánica, como la Cuenca de México, donde los sistemas de mercado promovieron estrategias de tributo que fueron caracterizadas por mercanismos de expansión imperial menos intrusivos.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Albarracin-Jordan, J. 1992 Prehispanic and Early Colonial Settlement Patterns in the Lower Tiwanaku Valley, Bolivia. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Texas.Google Scholar
Albarracin-Jordan, J., and Mathews, J. E. 1990 Asentamientos prehispánicos del Valle de Tiwanaku. vol. 1. Producciones CIMA, La Paz.Google Scholar
Algaze, G. 1989 The Uruk Expansion. Current Anthropology 30:571608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bandelier, A. 1910 The Islands of Titicaca and Koati. Hispanic Society, New York.Google Scholar
Bauer, B. 1992a The Development of the Inca State. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Bauer, B. 1992b Ritual Pathways of the Inca: An Analysis of the Collasuyu Ceques in Cuzco, Peru. Latin American Antiquity 3:183205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berdan, F. F. 1994 Economic Alternatives under Imperial Rule. In Economies and Polities in the Aztec Realm, edited by M. G. Hodge and M. E. Smith, pp. 291312. Institute for Mesoamerican Studies, State University of New York, Albany.Google Scholar
Blanton, R., and Feinman, G. 1984 The Mesoamerican World System. American Anthropologist 86:673682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanton, R. E., Feinman, G. M., Kowalewski, S. A., and Peregrine, P. N. 1996 A Dual-Processual Theory for the Evolution of Mesoamerican Civilization. Current Anthropology 37:114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouysse-Cassagne, T. 1975 Pertenencia étnica, status económico y lenguas en charcas a fines del siglo XVI. In Tasa de la Visita General de Francisco de Toledo, edited by D. N. Cook, pp. 312328. Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima.Google Scholar
Bouysse-Cassagne, T. 1986 Urco and Uma: Aymara Concepts of Space. In Anthropological History of Andean Polities, edited by J. V. Murra, N. Wachtel, and J. Revel, pp. 201227. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brumfiel, E. M. 1980 Specialization, Market Exchange, and the Aztec State: A View from Huexotla. Current Anthropology 21:459478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brumfiel, E. M. 1983 Aztec State Making: Ecology, Structure, and the Origin of the State. American Anthropologist 85:261284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calnek, E. E. 1982 Patterns of Empire Formation in the Valley of Mexico, Late Postclassic Period, 1200–1521. In The Inca and Aztec States: 1400–1800, edited by G. A. Collier, R. I. Rosaldo, and J. D. Wirth, pp. 4362. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Cieza de León, P. 1959[1553] The Incas of Pedro de Cieza de León. Translated by H. de Onis, edited by V. W. von Hagen. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman.Google Scholar
Cobo, B. 1979[1653] History of the Inca Empire. Translated by R. Hamilton. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Cobo, B. 1990[1653] Inca Religion and Customs. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Cook, D. N. (editor) 1975[1582] Tasa de la visita general de Francisco de Toledo. Universidad Nacional de San Marcos, Lima.Google Scholar
Conrad, G. W., and Demarest, A. A. 1984 Religion and Empire: The Dynamics of Aztec and Inca Expansionism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Culagovski, M. J. 1978 La visitación de los Chupachu y la unidad domestica andina. Historica 2(2):213223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Altroy, T. 1992 Provincial Power in the lnka Empire. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
DeMarrais, E., Castillo, L. J., and Earle, T. 1996 Ideology, Materialization, and Power Strategies. Current Anthropology 37:1531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diez de San Miguel, G. 1964[1567] Visita hecha a la Provincia de Chucuito. Ediciones de la Casa de la Cultura de Perú, Lima.Google Scholar
Earle, T. 1978 Economic and Social Organization of a Complex Chiefdom: The Halelea District, Kauai, Hawaii. Anthropological Papers No. 63. Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Earle, T. 1985 Commodity Exchange and Markets in the Inca State: Recent Archaeological Evidence. In Markets and Marketing, edited by S. Plattner, pp. 369397. University Press of America, Lanham, Maryland.Google Scholar
Espinoza Soriano, W. 1982 Los chambillas y mitmas incas y chinchaysuyos en territorio Lupaca siglos XV–XX. Revista del Museo Nacional 46:419506.Google Scholar
Espinoza Soriano, W. 1987 Migraciones intemas en el reino Colla. Tejedores, plumeros, y alfarerros del estado imperial inca. Chungará 19:243289.Google Scholar
Frank, A. 1993 Bronze Age World Systems Cycles. Current Anthropology 34:383429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hastorf, C. 1990 The Effect of the Inka State on Sausa Agricultural Production and Crop Consumption. American Antiquity 55:262290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hastorf, C, and Johannessen, S. 1993 Pre-Hispanic Political Change and the Role of Maize in the Central Andes of Peru. American Anthropologist 95:115138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodges, R. 1988 Primitive and Peasant Markets. Blackwell, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hyslop, J. Jr. 1976 An Archaeological Investigation of the Lupaqa Kingdom and its Origins. Unpublished Ph.D dissertation. Department of Anthropology, Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar
Hyslop, J. Jr. 1984 The Inka Road System. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Johnson, A., and Earle, T. K. 1987 The Evolution of Human Society. Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, California.Google Scholar
Julien, C. 1983 Hatunqolla: A View of Inca Rule from the Lake Titicaca Region. Series Publications in Anthropology, vol. 15. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Julien, C. 1988 How Inca Decimal Organization Worked. Ethnohistory 35:257279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Julien, C. 1993 Finding a Fit: Archaeology and Ethnohistory of the Incas. In Provincial Inca, edited by M. Malpass, pp. 177233. University of Iowa Press, Iowa City.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohl, P. 1987 The Use and Abuse of World Systems Theory: The Case of the Pristine West Asian State. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory 11:135.Google Scholar
Kolata, A. 1993 The Tiwanaku. Blackwell, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kurtz, D. V. 1974 Peripheral and Transitional Markets: The Aztec Case. American Ethnologist 1:685705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Lone, D. E. 1982 The Inca as a Nonmarket Economy: Supply on Command versus Supply and Demand. In Contexts for Prehistoric Exchange, edited by J. Ericson and T. K. Earle, pp. 291316. Academic Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeVine, T. Y. 1987 Inka Labor Service at the Regional Level: The Functional Reality. Ethnohistory 34:1446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manzanilla, L. 1992 Akapana. Una pirámide en el centro del mundo. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City.Google Scholar
Mathews, J. 1992 Prehispanic Settlement and Agriculture in the Middle Tiwanaku Valley, Bolivia. Unpublished Ph.D dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Chicago, Chicago.Google Scholar
Mayer, E. 1982 A Tribute to the Household. Domestic Economy and the Encomienda in Colonial Peru. Institute of Latin American Studies, Austin, Texas.Google Scholar
Menzel, D. 1959 The Inca Occupation of the South Coast of Peru. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 15:125142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, C. 1979 Maize Beer in the Economics, Politics, and Religion of the Inca Empire. In Fermented Beverages in Nutrition, edited by G. Gastineau, W. J. Darby, and T. E. Turner, pp. 2134. Academic Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murra, J. V. 1978 Los olleros del Inka: hacia una historia y arqueología del Qollasuyu. In Historia, problema y promesa: homenaje a Jorge Basadre, edited by F. Miro Quesada, F. Pease, and D. Sobrevilla A., pp. 415243. Universidad Católica del Peru, Lima.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murra, J. V. 1982 The Mit’a Obligations of Ethnic Groups to the Inka State. In The Inca and Aztec States: 1400–1800, edited by G. A. Collier, R. I. Rosaldo, and J. D. Wirth, pp. 239262. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Murra, J. V. 1985 The Limits and Limitations of the “Vertical Archipelago” in the Andes. In Andean Ecology and Civilization, edited by M. Shozo, I. Shimada, and C. Morris, pp. 1520. University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo.Google Scholar
Nash, D. 1987 Imperial Expansion under the Roman Republic. In Centre and Periphery in the Ancient World, edited by M. Rowlands, M. Larsen, and K. Kristiansen, pp. 87103. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Parsons, J. R. 1971 Prehistoric Settlement Patterns in the Texcoco Region, Mexico. Memoirs No. 3, Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, J. R., Brumfiel, E., Parsons, M. H., and Wilson, D. J. 1982 Prehispanic Settlement Patterns in the Southern Valley of Mexico, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, T. C. 1991 The Inca Empire, the Formation and Disintegration of a Pre-Capitalist State. Berg, Oxford, England.Google Scholar
Pease, G. Y, , F. 1982 The Formation of Tawantinsuyu: Mechanisms of Colonization and Relationship with Ethnic Groups. In The Inca and Aztec States 1400–1800, edited by G. A. Collier, R. I. Rosaldo, and J. D. Wirth, pp. 173198. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Polanyi, K. 1957 The Economy as Instituted Process. In Trade and Market in the Early Empires, edited by K. Polanyi, C. Arensberg, and H. Pearson, pp. 243270. Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
Ponce Sanginés, C, Reinhard, J., Portugal, M., Pareja, E., and Ticlla, L. (editors) 1992 Exploraciones arqueológicas subacuáticas en el Logo Titikaka. Editorial La Palabra Producciones, La Paz.Google Scholar
Ramos Gavilan, A. 1988[1621] Historia del Santuario de Nuestra Señora de Copacabana, edited by I. Prado Pastor. Gráfico P. L Villanueva S.A., Lima.Google Scholar
Rostworowski de Diez Canseco, M. 1988 Historia de Tahuantinsuyu. Instituto de Estudios Peruanos, Lima.Google Scholar
Rowe, J. H. 1946 Inca Culture at the Time of the Spanish Conquest. In The Andean Civilizations, edited by J. Steward, pp. 183330. Handbook of South American Indians, vol. 2. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Rowlands, M. 1987 Centre and Periphery: A Review of a Concept. In Centre and Periphery in the Ancient World, edited by M. Rowlands, M. Larsen, and K. Kristiansen, pp. 112. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Schreiber, K. 1992 Wari Imperialism in Middle Horizon Peru. Anthropological Papers. Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverblatt, I. 1987 Moon, Sun and Witches. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Service, E. 1972 Origins of the State and Civilization. Norton, New York.Google Scholar
Smith, M. E. 1979 The Aztec Marketing System and Settlement Pattern in the Valley of Mexico: A Central Place Analysis. American Antiquity 44:110125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, M. E. 1986 The Role of Social Stratification in the Aztec Empire: A View from the Provinces. American Anthropologist 88:7091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, M. E. 1987 The Expansion of the Aztec Empire: A Case Study in the Correlation of Diachronic Archaeological and Ethnohistorical Data. American Antiquity 52:3754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, M. E., and Hodge, M. G. 1994 Introduction. In Economies and Polities in the Aztec Realm, edited by M. G. Hodge and M. E. Smith, pp. 142. Institute for Mesoamerican Studies, State University of New York, Albany.Google Scholar
Spalding, K. 1984 Huarochirí. An Andean Society under Inca and Spanish Rule. Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, California.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanish, C. 1989 Household Archaeology: Testing Models of Zonal Complementarity in the South Central Andes. American Anthropologist 91:724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanish, C. 1992 Ancient Andean Political Economy. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Stanish, C. 1994 The Hydraulic Hypothesis Revisited: A Theoretical Perspective on Lake Titicaca Basin Raised Field Agriculture. Latin American Antiquity 5:312332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanish, C, E. de la Vega, M., Steadman, L., Frye, K. L., Justo, C. Ch., L. Onofre, M., Seddon, M., and Calisaya Ch., P. 1994 Archaeological Research in the Juli-Desaguadero Region of the Lake Titicaca Basin, Southern Peru. Manuscript on file, Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago.Google Scholar
Tschopik, H. 1946 The Aymara. In Handbook of South American Indians, vol. 2, edited by J. Steward, pp. 501574. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Tschopik, M. 1946 Some Notes of the Archaeology of the Department of Puno. Papers of the Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology Vol. 27, No. 3. Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Urton, G. 1990 The History of a Myth: Pacariqtambo and the Origin of the Inkas. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Vaca de Castro Cavallero, C. 1909[1543] Ordenanzas de tambos, distancias de unos a otros, modo de cargar los indios y obligaciones de las justicias respectivas. Revista Histórica 3:427492.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, I. 1974 The Modern World System I. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Zuidema, T. 1983 Hierarchy and Space in Incaic Social Organization. Ethnohistory 30:4975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar